From: Stephen D. <sd...@gm...> - 2005-02-15 08:22:05
|
Sorry, the full history thing is a no-go, I misunderstood what you said in your earlier email... You wouldn't be able to extract only the 4.0 branch from the cvs backup anyway. 4.0.10 is good. I just added a switch parsing RFE. Extracted from my repo and diffed against 4.0.10, but untested. Shouldn't be too much wrong. Find your gnarliest switch parsing code and give it a try... On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:58:38 +0100, Zoran Vasiljevic <zv...@ar...> wrote: > On Tuesday 15 February 2005 04:01, Vlad Seryakov wrote: > > Hey guys, > > > > I got the cable working again, i am alive. > > > > So what is the current status? > > I know everybody is busy, just to be on the same page? > > Do we have CVS operational yet? > > > > We don't. I'm pretty swamped with one support issue since > monday so I was unable to get anything in. > I have checked out the 4.0.10 clean and wanted to prune > some things (as said in my last mail) didn't get to it > since. I suppose if everybody is fine with clean 4.0.10 > import I can do this today or tomorrow. > Stephen mentioned importing the whole cvs together with > history but this is more work (I've never done it before). > OTOH, importing the clean state isn't hence I think I can > push it somewhere in between. > Which way would be more acceptable for you: clean import > or cvs-history import? > > For the cvs history import, I assume I should backup the > entire CVS from the aolserver project (I think I can do > that - I'm one of the admins there). I would still have > to examine how this goes, really. |