From: Gustaf N. <ne...@wu...> - 2021-01-11 14:13:51
|
Dear David, I could reproduce the behavior. The problem was due to a change about a year ago, which reduced code duplication in cases, where no section for nsproxy was provided in the configuration file. In reported case, it was looking for "ns/server/default/module/nsproxy". This explains as well, while this was not noted earlier. The version on bitbucket has this problem now fixed. I have extended the API slightly to reduce complexity. All the best and many thanks for the report. -gn |