From: David O. <da...@qc...> - 2017-05-15 14:07:39
|
Thanks - that stops the seg fault... it does seem to leave a lot of zombies though. This is the output during the ns_proxy test: [15/May/2017:15:03:47][7028.7ffff5c3b700][-command-] Notice: releasing busy proxy testpool-8 [15/May/2017:15:03:48][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning: [testpool]: pid 7590 won't die, send signal 15 [15/May/2017:15:03:48][7028.7ffff5c3b700][-command-] Notice: releasing busy proxy testpool-8 [15/May/2017:15:03:49][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning: [testpool]: pid 7590 won't die, send signal 9 [15/May/2017:15:03:49][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning: [testpool]: pid 7591 won't die, send signal 15 [15/May/2017:15:03:49][7028.7ffff5c3b700][-command-] Notice: releasing busy proxy testpool-8 [15/May/2017:15:03:50][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning: nsproxy: zombie: 7590 [15/May/2017:15:03:50][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning: [testpool]: pid 7591 won't die, send signal 9 [15/May/2017:15:03:50][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning: [testpool]: pid 7621 won't die, send signal 15 [15/May/2017:15:03:50][7028.7ffff5c3b700][-command-] Notice: releasing busy proxy testpool-8 [15/May/2017:15:03:51][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning: nsproxy: zombie: 7591 [15/May/2017:15:03:51][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning: [testpool]: pid 7621 won't die, send signal 9 [15/May/2017:15:03:51][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning: [testpool]: pid 7622 won't die, send signal 15 [15/May/2017:15:03:52][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning: nsproxy: zombie: 7621 [15/May/2017:15:03:52][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning: [testpool]: pid 7622 won't die, send signal 9 [15/May/2017:15:03:52][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning: [testpool]: pid 7640 won't die, send signal 15 [15/May/2017:15:03:52][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Error: process 7640 killed with signal 15 (Terminated) [15/May/2017:15:03:53][7028.7fffc67fc700][-nsproxy:reap-] Warning: nsproxy: zombie: 7622 On 15 May 2017 at 14:45, Gustaf Neumann <ne...@wu...> wrote: > Am 15.05.17 um 15:15 schrieb David Osborne: > > Thanks. > > > > This does indeed seem to fix the test case I sent - > good > > however I'm now getting a segmentation fault during the "make test". > bad > > i've made the code more robust .... although it is not clear to me yet, > how the > proxy can be "Busy" without having a slave... maybe a race condition. I > will check. > -g > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > naviserver-devel mailing list > nav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel > |