From: Gustaf N. <ne...@wu...> - 2014-04-05 10:12:49
|
Dear Cesáreo, it is the same grade (which is a very rough and imprecise rating), but on your site, there is no FS used for any browser. i've now configured the below cipher set & protocols on next-scripting.org, and if you compare e.g. the output Android 2.3.7, next-scripting has FS, but cesareox not. Android 2.3.7 <https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/viewClient.html?name=Android&version=2.3.7> No SNI ^2 TLS 1.0 TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (|0x33|) FS 128 Maybe you are using an older version of OpenSSL. I've updated just now nsssl on bitbucket to report the OpenSSL version number to the log file. On next-scripting, it says: Notice: nsssl: version 0.4 loaded, based on OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013 This is the version number coming with Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug). Please check, what you get. Best regards -g Am 04.04.14 23:00, schrieb Cesáreo García Rodicio: > I get the same A- grade: > https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=cesareox.com (because of PFS) > > My ciphers and protocols: > > ns_param ciphers > "ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:DHE-DSS-AES128-GCM-SHA256:kEDH+AESGCM:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256:DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:AES128-GCM-SHA256:AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-RC4-SHA:AES128:AES256:RC4-SHA:HIGH:!aNULL:!eNULL:!EXPORT:!DES:!3DES:!MD5:!PSK" > ns_param protocols "SSLv3, TLSv1" > > As seen on: > https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS > |