From: David O. <da...@qc...> - 2013-07-08 13:21:25
|
That certainly does the trick. Thanks. What's your opinion. Could this be considered a bug in Tcl? Would seem a lot cleaner if ::clock::Initialize just ran ::tcl::clock::ClearCaches before initialising the TZData array which would allow ::tcl::clock::Initalize to run multiple times. I notice the same test case doesn't raise an error in Aolserver. Seems after a ns_eval the ::tcl::clock:: vars left not populated so ::tcl::clock::Initialize runs cleanly. Couldn't ascertain from my limited understanding of the internals why it should be different. -- David Osborne On 5 July 2013 19:19, Gustaf Neumann <ne...@wu...> wrote: > Dear David, > > Now we exclude proc ::clock from the blueprint and this should solve this > issue. > By doing so, we are loosing some flexibility (namely to overload ::clock > with a tailored version), but i think we can live with this. > > Please try again > -gustaf neumann > > PS: Not sure, why ::clock is defined so wierd by Tcl. > |