Re: [naviserver-devel] naviserver with connection thread queue

[Gustaf N. <ne...@wu...>]

Am 05.12.12 00:41, schrieb Stephen Deasey:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Gustaf Neumann <ne...@wu...> wrote:
>> It is interesting to see, that with always 5 connections threads running and
>> using jemalloc, we see a rss consumption only slightly larger than with
>> plain tcl and zippy malloc having maxthreads == 2, having less requests
>> queued.
>>
>> Similarly, with tcmalloc we see with minthreads to 5, maxthreads 10
>>
>>     requests 2062 spools 49 queued 3 connthreads 6 rss 376
>>     requests 7743 spools 429 queued 359 connthreads 11 rss 466
>>     requests 8389 spools 451 queued 366 connthreads 12 rss 466
>>
>> which is even better.
> Min/max threads 5/10 better than 2/10?
the numbers show that 5/10 with tcmalloc is better than 5/10 with 
jemalloc and only slghtly worse than 2/2 with zippymalloc.

-gn