Re: [naviserver-devel] naviserver with connection thread queue

[Stephen D. <sd...@gm...>]

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Gustaf Neumann <ne...@wu...> wrote:
>
> It is interesting to see, that with always 5 connections threads running and
> using jemalloc, we see a rss consumption only slightly larger than with
> plain tcl and zippy malloc having maxthreads == 2, having less requests
> queued.
>
> Similarly, with tcmalloc we see with minthreads to 5, maxthreads 10
>
>    requests 2062 spools 49 queued 3 connthreads 6 rss 376
>    requests 7743 spools 429 queued 359 connthreads 11 rss 466
>    requests 8389 spools 451 queued 366 connthreads 12 rss 466
>
> which is even better.

Min/max threads 5/10 better than 2/10? How about 7/10? When you hit
10/10 you can delete an awful lot of code :-)