From: Bernd E. <eid...@we...> - 2008-11-24 07:24:50
|
> This is weird, 8.4 also has errors? (you were using 8.5.5 before?) > > 8.4.19 works for me. Tried, out of a habit, the latest 8.5.5, but need latest 8.4.x to know our app runs. So, both. > Are you compiling 32bit on a 64bit linux box? 32bit/os Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 8.04.1 Release: 8.04 Codename: hardy Linux box 2.6.24-16-server #1 SMP Thu Apr 10 13:58:00 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 15 model : 39 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3700+ stepping : 1 cpu MHz : 1000.000 cache size : 1024 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm 3dnowext 3dnow up pni lahf_lm ts fid vid ttp tm stc bogomips : 2001.67 clflush size : 64 > > BTW: "make install" fails because of "install-docs" in Makefile, > > maybe it would make sense to change the Makefile to be more > > aware of missing "dtplite"-missing situations. > > The idea is that if you are building from a released tarball then the > built documentation is included and you don't need dtplite. If you're > building direct from the repo, you need dtplite (and autoconf, etc.). That's ok. But as we do not offer released tarballs very often, maybe it's super easy for a Makefile wizard to test for DTPLITE existence and work around? For now, it just breaks the installation step... Bernd. |