Menu
▾
▴
[ naviserver-Feature Requests-1202462 ] Rewrite to use Tcl VFS filesystem abstraction
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-05-16 06:55:08
|
Feature Requests item #1202462, was opened at 2005-05-15 22:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by vasiljevic You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=719009&aid=1202462&group_id=130646 Category: C-API Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Zoran Vasiljevic (vasiljevic) Assigned to: Zoran Vasiljevic (vasiljevic) Summary: Rewrite to use Tcl VFS filesystem abstraction Initial Comment: We should really invest some time and rewrite all (most?) of the internal usages of open(), stat() (etc) so we can take advantage of Tcl virtual filesystem wappers. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Zoran Vasiljevic (vasiljevic) Date: 2005-05-16 08:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=95086 The advantage is that you can for example, assemble all of the server distro in a starkit and distribute it as a wrapped application. Also, all sorts of filesystem wrappers (tar, zip, metakit, http, ...) are already implemeted in TclVFS so you can serve pages out of the tar/zip files directly, for example. No, mmap kind of things would be not possible since all would be going thru Tcl API. But, where is the mmap used? I believe only in fastpath and only if you explicitly enable it. And, only for Unix port. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Stephen Deasey (sdeasey) Date: 2005-05-16 01:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=87254 What would be the advantage of using the Tcl VFS? Would it be just as fast? Could we still use performance enhancemts such as mmap() and sendfile()? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=719009&aid=1202462&group_id=130646 |
