From: H. P. A. <hp...@zy...> - 2007-05-01 03:58:27
|
anonymous coward wrote: >> In NASM lingo it would be %IFN. However, since NASM lacks %IFN, one >> has to invert the expression, and use %IF. >> >> Ideally %IFN should be added to NASM. > > Fwiw, that's SF RFE #786286. What really needs to work is "%if !foo", as in C. I have been doing "%if foo == 0" myself, but that's a bit hacky. -hpa |