[Nasm-devel] 2.10rc3 compiler warnings

[<p1...@ja...>]

When compiling Nasm 2.10rc3 on Fedora 14 with gcc 4.5.1 the following 
warnings are generated:

assemble.c: In function ‘assemble’:
assemble.c:514:21: warning: case value ‘27’ not in enumerated type ‘enum 
prefixes’
assemble.c:521:21: warning: case value ‘49’ not in enumerated type ‘enum 
prefixes’
assemble.c:528:21: warning: case value ‘57’ not in enumerated type ‘enum 
prefixes’
assemble.c:535:21: warning: case value ‘60’ not in enumerated type ‘enum 
prefixes’
assemble.c:538:21: warning: case value ‘61’ not in enumerated type ‘enum 
prefixes’
assemble.c:548:21: warning: case value ‘110’ not in enumerated type 
‘enum prefixes’
assemble.c:549:21: warning: case value ‘111’ not in enumerated type 
‘enum prefixes’
assemble.c:541:21: warning: case value ‘116’ not in enumerated type 
‘enum prefixes’

parser.c: In function ‘prefix_slot’:
parser.c:76:5: warning: case value ‘27’ not in enumerated type ‘enum 
prefixes’
parser.c:77:5: warning: case value ‘49’ not in enumerated type ‘enum 
prefixes’
parser.c:79:5: warning: case value ‘57’ not in enumerated type ‘enum 
prefixes’
parser.c:80:5: warning: case value ‘60’ not in enumerated type ‘enum 
prefixes’
parser.c:81:5: warning: case value ‘61’ not in enumerated type ‘enum 
prefixes’
parser.c:78:5: warning: case value ‘116’ not in enumerated type ‘enum 
prefixes’

Aside from the warning messages themselves which should be easily 
corrected, the interesting thing is that the values 110 and 111 appear 
in assemble.c but not parser.c? Are these missing case statements or is 
parser.c correct as is?
I'm not familiar enough with the source to provide any more input that 
this, sorry.