|
From: H. P. A. <hp...@zy...> - 2010-10-05 04:23:12
|
On 10/04/2010 05:56 PM, Frank Kotler wrote: > > I didn't say I knew how to use it! :) > > Seriously, the only thing I've ever used "%00" for is trying to get Nasm > to assemble Masm/Tasm code. We can make: > > code SEGMENT > > into: > > section code > > (Nasm warns about redefining "segment", but it works) > > Curiously, the other suggested abandoned feature is used for the same > thing! > > %idefine offset > %idefine ptr & > > This cruft doesn't work very well, or only on a very limited subset of > Masm/Tasm code, but it's the only example I know. > > Anyway, here's a first draft of some documentation for "%00". If we > change it to "%:", the way the documentation is laid out, it's going to > look like "%::" - we get our confusion back! :) > > Do we need to say more? Do we need an example? Maybe this is "done"... > Yeah, I think %00 is good enough, and it's backwards-compatible... -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. |