|
From: anonymous c. <nas...@us...> - 2010-10-04 13:31:48
|
>>> Does anyone agree with >>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=809197&group_id=6208&atid=356208 >>> in turning %00 into %: ? >> >> Unless you've got some really good reason to break backward (balkward) >> compatibility, I'm afraid I don't agree. I realize this is undocumented, >> but it's been like that for a long time! > > I can see adding %: as an alias, but breaking the existing functionality > is just right out. Yes, the code snippet suggested in SF #809197 adds support for '%:' but retains '%00' -- there's a comment in it suggesting a warning for the latter. (I ended up implementing a suppressible warning for 'abandoned' features. As of writing this I'm left with two if them: '%00' is one, and '...&... instead of ...[...] for effective addresses' is the other.) |