From: Matthew K. <mk...@ma...> - 2004-09-23 19:09:10
|
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 11:33, jeff vier wrote: > On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 11:31 -0700, Matthew Kent wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 07:29, jeff vier wrote: > > > are you sure that was against the latest cvs? > > > > > > I was able to apply it manually, but the first and third files has all > > > hunks fail.... > > > > > > > Yeah it's against the current nagios 2.0 code fetched via anonymous cvs. > > > > mkent@fuego:~$ patch -p0 < nagios-2.0a1-speedup_status.patch > > patching file nagios/common/statusdata.c > > patching file nagios/include/statusdata.h > > patching file nagios/xdata/xsddefault.c > > Yes, I understand what is supposed to happen, but what I'm saying is > that it didn't for me, and I tried it against current, stock cvs code. Okay if this: mkent@fuego:~$ cvs -d:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/nagios login Logging in to :pserver:ano...@cv...:2401/cvsroot/nagios CVS password: mkent@fuego:~$ cvs -Q -z3 -d:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/nagios co nagios mkent@fuego:~$ man cvs mkent@fuego:~$ patch -p0 < nagios-2.0a1-speedup_status.patch patching file nagios/common/statusdata.c patching file nagios/include/statusdata.h patching file nagios/xdata/xsddefault.c mkent@fuego:~$ doesn't work. Then I must be seeing things! :) -- Matthew Kent <mk...@ma...> http://magoazul.com |