From: Marc P. <ma...@en...> - 2007-08-29 21:56:41
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: nag...@li... [mailto:nagios-users- > bo...@li...] On Behalf Of Mr D > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 1:19 PM > To: nag...@li... > Subject: [Nagios-users] Nagios Scalability >=20 > Greets > First question: is Nagios 3 and up, adequate for a task of this size. > >From my own experience with Nagios the answer would be yes, but > potentially 100,000 or more units is an awful lot of units. I'm not a high-count site like that (~4,000 services) but just my $0.02. -- Nagios-3 just entered beta status in the last 30 days. Chances are high that not many sites, let alone sites with high host and service counts, have put it through the grinder yet. It's also going to depend greatly on what you're monitoring and how often. 1 ping per device per year is a heck of a lot easier than running a 30 second plugin per device every minute, passive checks are better than active checks, etc. That being said, there have been many performance improvements for large sites in v3 over v2. Many of them are documented at http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/largeinstalltweaks.html. The three biggest in my mind are the parallelization of host checks, the ability to batch submit passive results from a file and the fast startup options.=20 Ethan maintains a user profile section on the site at http://www.nagios.org/userprofiles. The top site, presumably running v2 and added recently purports to be monitoring 1,000,000 services with 20 nagios machines (~50,000/machine). #2 is at 90,000 services with 10 servers. You can browse the rest to see what there is... -- Marc |