From: Jeremy R. <Jer...@ch...> - 2003-04-30 20:35:58
|
That would be cool... That's what I was really thinking. I would like to have all the alternatives, DB, flat text, etc... I just want each alternative to contain all aspects of the data. Not just the extended data, as Nagios currently is. The wrapper system would allow more things (Configuration Management, Change Management, and other Network Management features) to be integrated directly into Nagios with more ease I would think.=20 Jeremy Russell Network Administrator, CNI 580-272-2707 -----Original Message----- From: Showkilr [mailto:sho...@sh...]=20 Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 1:46 PM To: nagios-list Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] Mysql Support I was actually thinking of creating a wrapper system for the database support. so that the wrapper itself handles all the calls to mysql/postgresql/flatfile/??XML?? depending on the define at build time. I have seen this type of wrapper for Mysql and Postgresql. adding support for other types shouldn't be trivial.. Showkilr On Wed, 2003-04-30 at 13:33, Daniel Wittenberg wrote: > This would probably make it easier to write a web interface to manage it > as well. I was thinking of writing a webmin plugin to modify the text > files, but creating a DB and pulling the data from there would be > easier. It would be nice if you could pull the data from IRM or other > asset manager too so you could have all information about a host in one > place.....ummmm...*lots of ideas running around in head* >=20 > Dan >=20 > On Wed, 2003-04-30 at 13:26, Carroll, Jim P [Contractor] wrote: > > Don't fret. There have been discussions in the past to implement either a database (MySQL/PostgreSQL) or XML solution. But not by the author or core group. > >=20 > > Rather, some have wished (and I think a few have taken steps) for a database or XML solution, because to them, it makes their lives easier. The conclusion was that yes, these solutions were viable, but instead of *replacing* the Nagios config files, the alternative solutions, once populated, would be used to *create* the Nagios config files. Nagios would therefore need no direct modifications, Ethan et al wouldn't need to burn any additional midnight oil, and folks such as yourself would be happy campers. > >=20 > > Don't ask me what the status of such projects are, as I haven't been following them. > >=20 > > jc >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Nagios-users mailing list > Nag...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users > ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.=20 > ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nag...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.=20 ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null |