From: Ethan G. <na...@na...> - 2006-01-28 22:04:55
|
On 27 Jan 2006 at 21:36, Horvath Tamas wrote: > Hi! > > I think that status of those services which are associated with an > unreachable host should be unknown instead of critical. It would be > more precise. > > For example, if a section of a network become unreachable, servers in > that segment are still accessible from these segments, but > unaccessible from the outside world. So I can't know - from outside > Nagios box - whether their services are in OK state, or not. > > Thanks, Tamas! This doesn't fit all situations. Imagine that one service associated with the host is a DNS record check. The name associated with the host will likely continue to resolve during the host outage, so it should remain in an OK state. Ethan Galstad, Nagios Developer --- Email: na...@na... Website: http://www.nagios.org |