myhdl-list

[myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Christopher F. <chr...@gm...>]

I think it is time for the 0.9 release, the major
feature in 0.9 is the interfaces.  Some have been
using the interfaces for awhile and there are no
obvious issues.

I think 0.9 could be released, thoughts?

Regards,
Chris

Re: [myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Jan D. <ja...@ja...>]

On 12/30/2014 03:42 PM, Christopher Felton wrote:
> I think it is time for the 0.9 release, the major
> feature in 0.9 is the interfaces.  Some have been
> using the interfaces for awhile and there are no
> obvious issues.
>
> I think 0.9 could be released, thoughts?

I agree, but I have not been able to use the new features
myself yet.

First, do all the tests run? I thought there were still
some issues.

Most importantly - documentation? There should be something
in the manual. And also a whatsnew document so that people
know the purpose of the release.

I think there is one really major feature and that we
should set the spotlight on it to get attention. It's a
good example of how we can support functionality which
is not necessarily present in the target languages.

Jan

-- 
Jan Decaluwe - Resources bvba - http://www.jandecaluwe.com
     Python as a HDL: http://www.myhdl.org
     VHDL development, the modern way: http://www.sigasi.com
     World-class digital design: http://www.easics.com

Re: [myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Keerthan JC <jck...@gm...>]

All the core and verilog tests are passing on my branch. Some VHDL
conversion tests are failing on both stable and dev versions.
I still need to fine tune the top level ports naming scheme. I think we
will be ready for releasing after that.

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Jan Decaluwe <ja...@ja...> wrote:

> On 12/30/2014 03:42 PM, Christopher Felton wrote:
> > I think it is time for the 0.9 release, the major
> > feature in 0.9 is the interfaces.  Some have been
> > using the interfaces for awhile and there are no
> > obvious issues.
> >
> > I think 0.9 could be released, thoughts?
>
> I agree, but I have not been able to use the new features
> myself yet.
>
> First, do all the tests run? I thought there were still
> some issues.
>
> Most importantly - documentation? There should be something
> in the manual. And also a whatsnew document so that people
> know the purpose of the release.
>
> I think there is one really major feature and that we
> should set the spotlight on it to get attention. It's a
> good example of how we can support functionality which
> is not necessarily present in the target languages.
>
> Jan
>
> --
> Jan Decaluwe - Resources bvba - http://www.jandecaluwe.com
>      Python as a HDL: http://www.myhdl.org
>      VHDL development, the modern way: http://www.sigasi.com
>      World-class digital design: http://www.easics.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is
> your
> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> _______________________________________________
> myhdl-list mailing list
> myh...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/myhdl-list
>



-- 
have a nice day
-jck

Re: [myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Christopher F. <chr...@gm...>]

On 2/1/2015 2:57 PM, Jan Decaluwe wrote:
<snip>
>> I think 0.9 could be released, thoughts?
>
> I agree, but I have not been able to use the new features
> myself yet.
>
> First, do all the tests run? I thought there were still
> some issues.
>

I had forgotten there was a failing test, as @jck mentioned
he has a fix for it.  Once he creates a PR we will be
good to go with regression tests (I believe).

> Most importantly - documentation? There should be something
> in the manual. And also a whatsnew document so that people
> know the purpose of the release.

With the original PR there is a small start to
the documentation in the "What's new" section [1],
but it needs more!  I will look to @jck to
provide some details in the conversion section.

The interfaces need to be added to the manual as well.
Should it have its own section?  Or should it be
sprinkled throughout the manual, e.g. a mention in the
"signal, ports, and concurrency" section [2] and ...?

It sounds like we all agree, we can start working
towards a release.  That is, preparing documentation
and smoothing any rough corners.  The main feature
in this release is *interfaces* MEP107.

Regards,
Chris

[1] 
https://bitbucket.org/jandecaluwe/myhdl/src/f7a6b2ef05bbf418349d8b0021d81b4fc83b8ce0/doc/source/whatsnew/0.9.rst?at=0.9-dev
[2] 
http://docs.myhdl.org/en/latest/manual/intro.html#signals-ports-and-concurrency

Re: [myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Christopher F. <chr...@gm...>]

>> I think 0.9 could be released, thoughts?

There has been some intermingled chatter in other
threads on different topics and issues.  Below is
a subset summary per the relevant topics.


0.9 Release
-----------
It sounds like there are no blockades for a 0.9
release and we are moving forward with a 0.9 release.
Things that need to been completed:

    1. PR from @jck to resolve the failing interface
       tests.
    2. Documentation for interfaces.
    3. Normal release stuff.


The Move
--------
There also has been talk about moving to git/github.  I
assume this will happen after the 0.9 release, correct?


Regards,
Chris

Re: [myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Angel E. <ang...@gm...>]

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Christopher Felton
<chr...@gm...> wrote:
>>> I think 0.9 could be released, thoughts?
>
> There has been some intermingled chatter in other
> threads on different topics and issues.  Below is
> a subset summary per the relevant topics.
>
>
> 0.9 Release
> -----------
> It sounds like there are no blockades for a 0.9
> release and we are moving forward with a 0.9 release.
> Things that need to been completed:
>
>     1. PR from @jck to resolve the failing interface
>        tests.
>     2. Documentation for interfaces.
>     3. Normal release stuff.
>
>
> The Move
> --------
> There also has been talk about moving to git/github.  I
> assume this will happen after the 0.9 release, correct?

Has the move to git/github been decided? It may be a good move in
order to get more exposure for the project. However, having used git
and github recently for some open source contributions I find that the
experience is terrible compared to using mercurial (and BitBucket). I
don't get why people like github so much (other than because it is
very popular). I find that the BitBucket UI is not as flashy as
github's but is IMHO easier to use and mercurial is oh so much simpler
than git!

Angel

Re: [myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Henry G. <he...@ca...>]

On 09/02/15 12:29, Angel Ezquerra wrote:
> I find that the BitBucket UI is not as flashy as
> github's but is IMHO easier to use and mercurial is oh so much simpler
> than git!

I find precisely the opposite. Perhaps it's to do with what tools one is 
used to.

Henry

Re: [myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Angel E. <ang...@gm...>]

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Henry Gomersall <he...@ca...> wrote:
> On 09/02/15 12:29, Angel Ezquerra wrote:
>> I find that the BitBucket UI is not as flashy as
>> github's but is IMHO easier to use and mercurial is oh so much simpler
>> than git!
>
> I find precisely the opposite. Perhaps it's to do with what tools one is
> used to.

It was not my intention to start a mercurial vs git flamewar (hence
the "IMHO" qualifier on my statement above).

Out of curiosity, which part do you disagree with, the github vs
bitbucket part, the git vs mercurial part or both?
I'd be inclined to agree with you in that it is a matter of the tool
you are used to on the first part. On the second one (git vs
mercurial) not so much :P

Cheers!

Angel

Re: [myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Keerthan JC <jck...@gm...>]

There are failing VHDL tests: https://travis-ci.org/jck/myhdl/jobs/47472029

Are we planning to fix there before 0.9?

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Angel Ezquerra <ang...@gm...>
wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Henry Gomersall <he...@ca...> wrote:
> > On 09/02/15 12:29, Angel Ezquerra wrote:
> >> I find that the BitBucket UI is not as flashy as
> >> github's but is IMHO easier to use and mercurial is oh so much simpler
> >> than git!
> >
> > I find precisely the opposite. Perhaps it's to do with what tools one is
> > used to.
>
> It was not my intention to start a mercurial vs git flamewar (hence
> the "IMHO" qualifier on my statement above).
>
> Out of curiosity, which part do you disagree with, the github vs
> bitbucket part, the git vs mercurial part or both?
> I'd be inclined to agree with you in that it is a matter of the tool
> you are used to on the first part. On the second one (git vs
> mercurial) not so much :P
>
> Cheers!
>
> Angel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is
> your
> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> _______________________________________________
> myhdl-list mailing list
> myh...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/myhdl-list
>



-- 
have a nice day
-jck

Re: [myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Christopher F. <chr...@gm...>]

On 2/10/15 12:03 AM, Keerthan JC wrote:
> There are failing VHDL tests: https://travis-ci.org/jck/myhdl/jobs/47472029
>
> Are we planning to fix there before 0.9?
>

That is a good question, I am not sure.  Typically I
would say of course but these tests also fail on 8.1
(see below).

We could mark it as something todo maybe for a 9.1
release.  At this point I don't know why they are
failing or what it might take to fix them.  This would
seem reasonable to me (postpone the fix).

Regards,
Chris


>>> import myhdl
>>> myhdl.__version__
  '0.8.1'

>> ghdl --version
  GHDL 0.29 (20100109) [Sokcho edition]
   Compiled with GNAT Version: 4.6
   GCC back-end code generator
  Written by Tristan Gingold.

>> py.test GHDL.py test_*.py
  ============================= test session starts 
==============================
  platform linux2 -- Python 2.7.5 -- pytest-2.3.5
  collected 83 items

  test_adapter.py .
  test_AssignSignal.py .
  test_bin2gray.py ..
  test_case.py ....
  test_constants.py .
  test_dec.py ....
  test_errors.py ...
  test_fsm.py .
  test_hec.py .
  test_inc.py .....
  test_intbv_signed.py ...
  test_listofsigs.py ............
  test_loops.py ...............
  test_method.py ...
  test_nonlocal.py .
  test_numass.py .
  test_print.py ......
  test_ram.py .....
  test_rom.py ....
  test_ShadowSignal.py .F..
  test_ternary.py F.
  test_toplevel_method.py ....

  =================================== FAILURES 
===================================
  ______________________________ test_ConcatSignal 
_______________________________

      def test_ConcatSignal():
>       assert conversion.verify(bench_ConcatSignal) == 0
  E       assert 1 == 0
  E        +  where 1 = <myhdl.conversion._verify._VerificationClass 
object at 0x2e2ba50>(bench_ConcatSignal)
  E        +    where <myhdl.conversion._verify._VerificationClass 
object at 0x2e2ba50> = conversion.verify

  test_ShadowSignal.py:60: AssertionError
  ------------------------------- Captured stderr 
--------------------------------
  bench_ConcatSignal.vhd:45:19: constant "i" is not visible here
  bench_ConcatSignal.vhd:46:23: constant "j" is not visible here
  bench_ConcatSignal.vhd:47:27: constant "k" is not visible here
  bench_ConcatSignal.vhd:48:31: constant "m" is not visible here
  bench_ConcatSignal.vhd:49:37: prefix is neither a function name nor 
can it be sliced or indexed
  bench_ConcatSignal.vhd:50:30: prefix is neither a function name nor 
can it be sliced or indexed
  bench_ConcatSignal.vhd:51:37: prefix is neither a function name nor 
can it be sliced or indexed
  bench_ConcatSignal.vhd:52:37: prefix is neither a function name nor 
can it be sliced or indexed
  /usr/lib/ghdl/bin/ghdl: compilation error
  Analysis failed
  ________________________________ test_ternary1 
_________________________________

      def test_ternary1():
>       assert conversion.verify(TernaryBench, ternary1) == 0
  E       assert 1 == 0
  E        +  where 1 = <myhdl.conversion._verify._VerificationClass 
object at 0x2e2ba50>(TernaryBench, ternary1)
  E        +    where <myhdl.conversion._verify._VerificationClass 
object at 0x2e2ba50> = conversion.verify

  test_ternary.py:69: AssertionError
  ------------------------------- Captured stderr 
--------------------------------
  TernaryBench.vhd:63:28: ';' is expected instead of 'when'
  /usr/lib/ghdl/bin/ghdl: compilation error
  Analysis failed
  ===================== 2 failed, 81 passed in 57.23 seconds 
=====================

Re: [myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Jan D. <ja...@ja...>]

On 02/10/2015 07:03 AM, Keerthan JC wrote:
> There are failing VHDL tests: https://travis-ci.org/jck/myhdl/jobs/47472029
>
> Are we planning to fix there before 0.9?

I have to review the ternary operator test. This was in anticipation
of VHDL-2008, but now I'm not sure it's official VHDL.

As for the other tests, the tests that fail at my side are different
than yours (on github). Seems you fixed test_interfaces3.py,
but another test related to ShadowSignals now fails.

The goal for 0.9 should definitely be no failing tests.

Jan


> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Angel Ezquerra <ang...@gm... <mailto:ang...@gm...>> wrote:
>
>     On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Henry Gomersall <he...@ca... <mailto:he...@ca...>> wrote:
>     > On 09/02/15 12:29, Angel Ezquerra wrote:
>     >> I find that the BitBucket UI is not as flashy as
>     >> github's but is IMHO easier to use and mercurial is oh so much simpler
>     >> than git!
>     >
>     > I find precisely the opposite. Perhaps it's to do with what tools one is
>     > used to.
>
>     It was not my intention to start a mercurial vs git flamewar (hence
>     the "IMHO" qualifier on my statement above).
>
>     Out of curiosity, which part do you disagree with, the github vs
>     bitbucket part, the git vs mercurial part or both?
>     I'd be inclined to agree with you in that it is a matter of the tool
>     you are used to on the first part. On the second one (git vs
>     mercurial) not so much :P
>
>     Cheers!
>
>     Angel
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
>     sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
>     hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
>     leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
>     look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
>     _______________________________________________
>     myhdl-list mailing list
>     myh...@li... <mailto:myh...@li...>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/myhdl-list
>
>
>
>
> --
> have a nice day
> -jck
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> myhdl-list mailing list
> myh...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/myhdl-list
>


-- 
Jan Decaluwe - Resources bvba - http://www.jandecaluwe.com
     Python as a HDL: http://www.myhdl.org
     VHDL development, the modern way: http://www.sigasi.com
     World-class digital design: http://www.easics.com

Re: [myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Christopher F. <chr...@gm...>]

On 2/13/2015 12:28 PM, Jan Decaluwe wrote:
> On 02/10/2015 07:03 AM, Keerthan JC wrote:
>> There are failing VHDL tests: https://travis-ci.org/jck/myhdl/jobs/47472029
>>
>> Are we planning to fix there before 0.9?
>
> I have to review the ternary operator test. This was in anticipation
> of VHDL-2008, but now I'm not sure it's official VHDL.
>
> As for the other tests, the tests that fail at my side are different
> than yours (on github). Seems you fixed test_interfaces3.py,
> but another test related to ShadowSignals now fails.
>
> The goal for 0.9 should definitely be no failing tests.
>
> Jan
>

When I tested 0.8.1 with no modifications I had a
ShadowSignal failure:

   >> py.test GHDL.py test_*.py
   <snip>
   test_ShadowSignal.py .F..
   test_ternary.py F.

Regards,
Chris

Re: [myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Christopher F. <chr...@gm...>]

>
> When I tested 0.8.1 with no modifications I had a
> ShadowSignal failure:
>
>     >> py.test GHDL.py test_*.py
>     <snip>
>     test_ShadowSignal.py .F..
>     test_ternary.py F.
>

That was incomplete, wanted 0.8.1 to be the baseline.
This is the results for testing the latest 0.9-dev
on my system:

     >> py.test GHDL.py test_*.py
     test_interfaces3.py ..FF
     test_ShadowSignal.py .F..
     test_ternary.py F.

     >> py.test vcom.py test_*.py
     test_interfaces3.py ..FF
     test_ternary.py F.

     >> py.test Icarus.py test_*.py
     test_interfaces3.py ..FF


Regards,
Chris

Re: [myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Keerthan JC <jck...@gm...>]

Jan,
Is it safe for me to fork your github repo and apply my commits on it or
should I send a PR to bitbucket?

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Christopher Felton <chr...@gm...>
wrote:

>
> >
> > When I tested 0.8.1 with no modifications I had a
> > ShadowSignal failure:
> >
> >     >> py.test GHDL.py test_*.py
> >     <snip>
> >     test_ShadowSignal.py .F..
> >     test_ternary.py F.
> >
>
> That was incomplete, wanted 0.8.1 to be the baseline.
> This is the results for testing the latest 0.9-dev
> on my system:
>
>      >> py.test GHDL.py test_*.py
>      test_interfaces3.py ..FF
>      test_ShadowSignal.py .F..
>      test_ternary.py F.
>
>      >> py.test vcom.py test_*.py
>      test_interfaces3.py ..FF
>      test_ternary.py F.
>
>      >> py.test Icarus.py test_*.py
>      test_interfaces3.py ..FF
>
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is
> your
> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> _______________________________________________
> myhdl-list mailing list
> myh...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/myhdl-list
>



-- 
have a nice day
-jck

Re: [myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Jan D. <ja...@ja...>]

On 02/18/2015 08:16 AM, Keerthan JC wrote:
> Jan,
> Is it safe for me to fork your github repo and apply my commits on it

Keerthan:

We are on git/github now with an up-to-date repo and development
guide. Let's go ahead.

Jan

-- 
Jan Decaluwe - Resources bvba - http://www.jandecaluwe.com
     Python as a HDL: http://www.myhdl.org
     VHDL development, the modern way: http://www.sigasi.com
     World-class digital design: http://www.easics.com

Re: [myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Christopher F. <chr...@gm...>]

On 2/22/15 3:14 AM, Jan Decaluwe wrote:
> On 02/18/2015 08:16 AM, Keerthan JC wrote:
>> Jan,
>> Is it safe for me to fork your github repo and apply my commits on it
>
> Keerthan:
>
> We are on git/github now with an up-to-date repo and development
> guide. Let's go ahead.
>
> Jan
>

Since we are going full speed with github, Keerthan
should push the travis-CI scripts.  Can see the test
results on the main repo page :)

Regards,
Chris

Re: [myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Jan D. <ja...@ja...>]

On 02/22/2015 08:09 PM, Christopher Felton wrote:
> On 2/22/15 3:14 AM, Jan Decaluwe wrote:
>> On 02/18/2015 08:16 AM, Keerthan JC wrote:
>>> Jan,
>>> Is it safe for me to fork your github repo and apply my commits on it
>>
>> Keerthan:
>>
>> We are on git/github now with an up-to-date repo and development
>> guide. Let's go ahead.
>>
>> Jan
>>
>
> Since we are going full speed with github, Keerthan
> should push the travis-CI scripts.  Can see the test
> results on the main repo page :)

I am sure he will but give the guy a break :-) (He has
to use some git magic to add unrelated commits to the repo.)


-- 
Jan Decaluwe - Resources bvba - http://www.jandecaluwe.com
     Python as a HDL: http://www.myhdl.org
     VHDL development, the modern way: http://www.sigasi.com
     World-class digital design: http://www.easics.com

Re: [myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Christopher F. <chr...@gm...>]

On 2/9/2015 6:29 AM, Angel Ezquerra wrote:
<snip>
>>
>> The Move
>> --------
>> There also has been talk about moving to git/github.  I
>> assume this will happen after the 0.9 release, correct?
>
> Has the move to git/github been decided?

There is definite momentum in that direction, I believe
it is inevitable.

> It may be a good move in order to get more exposure for the
> project.

I don't believe that is the current rationale.

> However, having used git
> and github recently for some open source contributions I find that the
> experience is terrible compared to using mercurial (and BitBucket). I
> don't get why people like github so much (other than because it is
> very popular).

Unfortunately, these conversations are muddle because two
things are simultaneously discussed: the version control
tool and the web platform.

I am unaware of the technical arguments at this point, but
if the main developers have a strong preference for git
it is hard to argue against it.  As a community we want to
make development as easy as possible.  From my perspective,
this means: first, supporting the main developers; second,
outlining the process for new developers (both of these
occur in MyHDL).

If the pro-hg'ers were the highest contributors then there
might be precedence for discussion but that is not the
current situation.

 > I find that the BitBucket UI is not as flashy as
 > github's but is IMHO easier to use and mercurial is oh so much simpler
 > than git!

I agree and I am dreading having to invest the time to
figure out some of the more cryptic commands.

But since so many projects use git, this investment is not
a waste.  Hopefully I can avoid past major faux pas with
git :)  The biggest discomfort for me is not being able
to clone to a dropbox folder (or at least not easily).

In addition, one of arguments is the use of CI.  Since MyHDL
has good collection of tests and follows a test-driven mantra,
having an integrated CI is nice.  I know drone.io exists for
bitbucket but someone would need to show a working CI on
bitbucket the same as some have done for travis-ci.

In the end, as often stated, one of the best ways to support
MyHDL is to develop projects with it.  Each developer can
always choose which platform to host the project.

I am sure there will be more on this topic in the future.

Regards,
Chris

Re: [myhdl-list] Is it time for 0.9 release?

[Jan D. <ja...@ja...>]

On 02/09/2015 01:16 PM, Christopher Felton wrote:
>>> I think 0.9 could be released, thoughts?
>
> There has been some intermingled chatter in other
> threads on different topics and issues.  Below is
> a subset summary per the relevant topics.
>
>
> 0.9 Release
> -----------
> It sounds like there are no blockades for a 0.9
> release and we are moving forward with a 0.9 release.
> Things that need to been completed:
>
>      1. PR from @jck to resolve the failing interface
>         tests.
>      2. Documentation for interfaces.
>      3. Normal release stuff.

Correct.

> The Move
> --------
> There also has been talk about moving to git/github.  I
> assume this will happen after the 0.9 release, correct?

For a variety of reasons, I have basically decided to git
eventually, probably sooner than later. I have not decided
when exactly, I am working with @jck to sort that out.

Note that git is also more prominent than mercurial on
bitbucket, people who prefer that interface can use still
use it for their primary repo's.

@Chris - if you have documentation for 0.9 in your recent
fork, I will gladly pull it in of course.

Jan

-- 
Jan Decaluwe - Resources bvba - http://www.jandecaluwe.com
     Python as a HDL: http://www.myhdl.org
     VHDL development, the modern way: http://www.sigasi.com
     World-class digital design: http://www.easics.com

[myhdl-list] MyHDL within a kick-starter project ????

[David B. <dav...@ya...>]

I was wondering if anyone out there would be interested in receiving a white paper from me regarding my attempts at developing a kick-starter project (kickstarter.com) for the MyHDL environment ???    Is anyone interested ???  


Thanks,


David Blubaugh