Christopher Felton wrote:
>
> I'm not changing anything in our current setup, but I have
> enabled mercurial for MyHDL at SourceForge, and I will keep
> the repository there up to date also. This can be useful
> for people coming to MyHDL through SourceForge. It is
> also an additional back-up.
>
>
> That is pretty interesting, it shows some of the flexibility and
> features of a distributed version control system like mercurial. Easily
> keep different repositories in sync.
Indeed, with distributed version control all kinds of useful work
flows become easy and natural. It is easy to forget how complicated
things were with centralized systems. I don't want to go back.
I'm also happy with the particular choice of mercurial. It
fits my brain. Moreover, it seems more and more projects are
switching to it (or supporting it, like SourceForge). Python
itself, for example. Mercurial clearly is a winner.
Jan
--
Jan Decaluwe - Resources bvba - http://www.jandecaluwe.com
Python as a HDL: http://www.myhdl.org
VHDL development, the modern way: http://www.sigasi.com
Analog design automation: http://www.mephisto-da.com
World-class digital design: http://www.easics.com
|