Re: [myhdl-list] Block return values (myhdl.BlockError)

[Jos H. <jos...@gm...>]

Jan Decaluwe <jan <at> jandecaluwe.com> writes:

> I have nothing against collecting good ideas.
> 
> However, for this specific feature, I am unconvinced
> that the additional complexity is warranted. I may
> change that opinion with future evidence - until
> now it has only been brought up once as an alternative
> possibility and does not seem enough.

I didn't expect to raise such discussion ;-), and I guess we have to give 
it more thought. I have used all kinds of return values, next to Signals, 
especially in testbenches. The example I showed was a small part of a 
template based testbench+design which I will revisit, hopefully soon,  
with the current simplification.

> My priority is moving forward with the simplifications
> enabled by  <at> block, and I believe there are several
> much more relevant new features that these simplifications
> will make possible.
> 
> Jan
>