Re: [myhdl-list] Block return values (myhdl.BlockError)

[Henry G. <he...@ma...>]

On 10/05/16 10:32, Jan Decaluwe wrote:
> I have considered this issue for some time now
> and I have basically decided to leave the constraints
> as they are, that is, blocks should only return
> block and instantiator objects.

I think your reasoning is sound.

Do you object to alternative strategies for constructing Block
operators? This could leave @block as the default usual case, with more
esoteric cases handled by direct access to the construction of the Block
object. This could allow the best of both worlds - simple default and
arbitrary control if desired.

Henry