Re: [myhdl-list] rhea AssertionError

[Christopher F. <chr...@gm...>]

On 12/17/2015 9:12 PM, Edward Vidal wrote:
> Hi Chris,Is blinky consided a top level? I have a XulA2-LX9, do I
> just modify the   line 39 in _xula.py   device = 'XC6SLX9' -->
> device = 'XC6SLX9'?Or should we define a new class?

No, ideally you do not modify _xula.py file.  The
Xula2 itself does not have any LEDs, so the board
definition only includes the generic channel (IO)
ports.

I added some documentation and an example that shows
how to create a custom board definition:
docs: http://rhearay.readthedocs.org/en/latest/build/board_definition.html
example: 
https://github.com/cfelton/rhea/tree/master/examples/boards/xula/custom

> I  tested on
> ubuntu 12.04 with Xilinx 14.6.  All appears to work okay.  Only one
> led was tested. Should  blinky where I start with the CAT-Board
> also?Should the ice40_primitives.py be included as part of
> rhea?Regards,

I haven't looked at your ice40_primitives yet, yes
a version of it can be included in rhea.  I have
been trying to create vendor neutral primitives,
I will look over (at some point) you ice40_primitives
and see if I can use it in that approach.

Regards,
Chris