Re: [myhdl-list] Mixing MyHDL-generated source with other code
Brought to you by:
jandecaluwe
From: Christopher F. <chr...@gm...> - 2015-05-12 12:37:29
|
On 5/11/15 4:48 PM, Henry Gomersall wrote: > On 11/05/15 21:43, Christopher Felton wrote: >> On 5/11/2015 6:34 AM, Euripedes Rocha Filho wrote: >>>> I agree with Henry about the configuration. A .cfg or Yaml file do a better >>>> job. >>>> >> Hey guys, I think collaborating is a good idea >> and probably the best approach to create a tool >> that meets the needs of many users. >> >> It doesn't sound like gizflo is the best starting >> point and I am not in a position to lead a project. >> >> I have some short-term needs that I need to use >> gizflo for, I will continue to make changes. Hopefully, >> whatever you guys come up with can be the defacto >> tool in the future. Keep us informed of your progress. > > Hi Chris, I didn't mean to sound like a dick, I'm sorry. I sent the last > email when I was a bit short of time. I actually think gizflo looks like > a great starting point; my point was just that now is a good time to > fiddle with the config layout. No offense taken, all comments were reasonable. It sounded like you guys had a good vision what you wanted to accomplish (and on the same page) I want to encourage it. Building off of gizflo works also - I don't want to limit anyone's ambitions. It is a good time to wade through the design goals and architecture. I think the cfg will be too limiting and not the right fit. I won't explore the cfg but I encourage anyone to demonstrate capturing the full board definitions with cfg and we can discuss from there. > > Anyway, I too am lacking in time, so I should really shut up. My > apologies for wading in, though clearly I'd also love to have a more > myhdl oriented tool chain, and I dare say I'll start to commit patches > when as and when I use something like gizflo. No need for apologies, ideas can and should be challenged and often we will disagree. In the cases where we disagree on technical issue we need a method to move forward. More often than not we will eventually agree based on our arguments :) Regards, Chris |