Re: [myhdl-list] Setting of enum values

[Henry G. <he...@ca...>]

On 29/12/14 18:26, Christopher Felton wrote:
>> >AFAICT it doesn't acquire any state from the enum function so it could
>> >just as easily be at the module level, allowing more flexible usage when
>> >needing to fit the enum to an existing definition.
> I am sure there are many ways to implement it, this may
> not have been a use case envision or desired.  We can
> propose a modification to have the "Enum" class public
> and then various custom functions can be created to
> implement the codedicts, etc.  I think this would provide
> flexibility but also maintain a minimal / logical enum.

I'm keen on this. I don't see any reason why Enum should be so hard to 
access. I agree enum should be kept as is.

Cheers,

Henry