Re: [myhdl-list] Integrating MyHDL into a more "traditional" design work flow
Brought to you by:
jandecaluwe
From: Angel E. <ang...@gm...> - 2012-09-28 12:22:59
|
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Christopher Felton <chr...@gm...> wrote: > On 9/28/2012 2:26 AM, Angel Ezquerra wrote: >> Hi, >> >> For the past couple of years I've been following the MyHDL project >> with a lot of interest. I've been subscribed to the mailing list and >> followed many of the interesting discussions in here. I've done a few >> of the examples on my spare time and I have read the documentation a >> couple of times. >> >> I really like the language. I find it very clear and simply way nicer >> than VHDL, which is what we use in our projects where I work. I have >> quite a lot of experience with Python, and at work I sometimes use it >> with some of its great scientific packages, such as simpy, scipy, >> matplotlib, etc, mainly for simulation purposes although most of my >> colleagues use Matlab for this. >> > > Do you mean "simpy" or sympy? One is a CAS and one is > a discrete event simulator using generators and decorators > (hmm, sounds familiar). > > .chris > I misspelled it. I meant sympy (http://sympy.org/en/index.html)! Angel |