Re: [myhdl-list] MyHDL : The Case for a Better HDL
Brought to you by:
jandecaluwe
From: Norbo <Nor...@gm...> - 2012-09-16 15:42:56
|
Am 12.09.2012, 16:15 Uhr, schrieb Christopher Felton <chr...@gm...>: > On 9/7/2012 2:25 AM, Jan Decaluwe wrote: >> On 09/07/2012 03:14 AM, Christopher Felton wrote: >>> Jan has posted an interesting blog post >>> "MyHDL : The Case for a Better HDL" >>> http://bit.ly/ToK6xg at the All Programmable >>> Planet, http://www.programmableplanet.com/. >>> >>> Be sure and check out the post and contribute >>> to the conversation. >> >> Yes, I have been invited by Max Maxfield to become a blogger >> on that site. I was looking for a good forum to tell >> "the MyHDL story" for some time, and this looks ideal. It >> should give us visibility and spur some interesting >> discussions :-) >> >> I'll try to blog every 2 weeks or so. >> > > Has anyone else read the blog on APP? Anyone read the comments? Yes i have read through it. After using myhdl for some time now i really would not want to switch back to vhdl or systemC or systemVerilog. I think the reason is that when i write in myhdl i have to remember way less syntax and function calls with parameters (like with which types can i use with to_unsigned(..) function,is a bitwidth needed?, or how to use the shift_left(..) function, which types does the function needs,etc..) So i actually can write hardware code without visiting "google" and or different manuals every once and a while. I think there is a tendency not to switch back once one really got started with myhdl. Is this only my impression? greetings Norbo |