Re: [myhdl-list] MEP-108 Bundle

[Jan D. <ja...@ja...>]

On 06/01/2012 03:35 AM, Christopher Felton wrote:

>> I think we should have a go at MEP 108 to remove the
>> confusing "class attribute" terminology. Perhaps the
>> explanations make it less clear than just stating what
>> this MEP is about. Perhaps we should just
>> talk about a method at the top level - I understand
>> methods at lower levels already worked without this MEP.
>>
>
> Sounds good, I should have some time tomorrow to work
> through the modifications you suggested.

About the "self" argument: the MEP says that the
implementation looks for this argument and assumes it
has the usual meaning. This is just fine with me,
provided it is the *first* argument as per convention.
Probably this is what the implemenation does? If not,
it should, and the documentation should be adapated
also.


-- 
Jan Decaluwe - Resources bvba - http://www.jandecaluwe.com
     Python as a HDL: http://www.myhdl.org
     VHDL development, the modern way: http://www.sigasi.com
     World-class digital design: http://www.easics.com