Re: [myhdl-list] MEP : Signal Containers

[Jan D. <ja...@ja...>]

On 05/20/2012 04:43 PM, Tom Dillon wrote:

>> Best of my knowledge this is only an issue when the top-level is a class
>> method.  It appears class methods can be buried in the hierarchy but not
>> the top-level.  Which I think it self is a valid reason to add the
>> feature, for completeness.
>
> It is only a top level issue. Works fine at lower levels.

Logical perhaps, but I didn't realize this because never tried it myself.
This stuff is more powerful than I thought :-)

> I guess I give some credit to the completeness argument when I think of
> it that way. This is really the same argument for the signal containers
> as it just makes a consistent use for top level vs lower levels.

Let's go for it then, changeset welcome.


-- 
Jan Decaluwe - Resources bvba - http://www.jandecaluwe.com
     Python as a HDL: http://www.myhdl.org
     VHDL development, the modern way: http://www.sigasi.com
     World-class digital design: http://www.easics.com