Re: [myhdl-list] Migen logic design toolbox - now with simulator

[Jan D. <ja...@ja...>]

On 03/12/2012 03:44 PM, Sébastien Bourdeauducq wrote:

> features; in fact, if this brings about fruitful technical discussion,
> it would be welcome. I'd also be welcoming a Migen/MyHDL merger (no need
> to duplicate efforts) - but you rejected even the most simple patches
> from me - not my problem.

For the record: It was me who rejected those patches, not Chris.

I did what every reasonable project manager, including you I trust,
did. When the patches break the unit tests, they are rejected. So
stop blaming others for your problems please.

If you had simply followed the well-documented and reasonable
guidelines for patch submission, this would never had happened.
Again, your problem only.

As for a Migen/MyHDL merger, stop insulting our intelligence here,
we are engineers. It is your good right to think the event-driven
paradigm is the wrong choice. But of course you and I know damn
well that the paradigm choice is the fundamental design decision
behind an HDL. If you make a fundamentally different decision,
than *that* is the reason why a "merge" is not possible, not
our intransigence.

What Migen shows, is that you didn't like MyHDL's fundamental
design concept in the first place, which is your good right
and a very good reason for you to be elsewhere.

Jan

-- 
Jan Decaluwe - Resources bvba - http://www.jandecaluwe.com
     Python as a HDL: http://www.myhdl.org
     VHDL development, the modern way: http://www.sigasi.com
     World-class digital design: http://www.easics.com