Re: [myhdl-list] my patches

[Sébastien B. <seb...@mi...>]

On 10/18/2011 04:59 PM, Bob Cunningham wrote:
> If you think MyHDL has conservative policies, you should try to get a
> Linux kernel patch accepted.

Done: http://www.mail-archive.com/st...@li.../msg00138.html
You might say this is a trivial patch, but the MyHDL ones aren't 
complicated either (yet).

 > Are you going to create your own website to host and document your
 > fork?

The MyHDL mods are part of a larger HLS project that will, indeed, have 
its own website. So I'd simply distribute the modified MyHDL along with 
it :-)

 > What I think you mean to say is that you intend for your patch to
 > never have more than a single user: You.

Certainly not, and this is also why I posted on this mailing list in 
order to try to avoid forking. But since getting even simple patches 
reviewed/accepted is messy, forking is probably easier for me.

 > What is the problem you are trying to solve?  Can you distill it to a
 > small, clear example?

See my initial emails (about constant drivers and object support), and 
the links to such examples that accompanied the patches.

S.