Re: [myhdl-list] rosettacode submission

[Christopher F. <chr...@gm...>]

On 5/9/2011 6:57 AM, Jan Coombs wrote:
> On 09/05/11 12:34, Christopher Felton wrote:
>> On 5/9/2011 6:24 AM, Jan Coombs wrote:
>>> On 02/04/11 18:49, Jan Decaluwe wrote:
>>>>       . . .
>>>> I read that he doesn't agree to give MyHDL it own category.
>>>
>>> Does this look like a good compromise?
>>>
>>>       http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Four_bit_adder#MyHDL
>>>
>>> Any other comments?
>>>
>>> Jan Coombs
>>
>> I thought a separate section for MyHDL would not be provided/added?
>>
>> I still do not prefer the structural approach.  I think the inverter,
>> and2, or2, xor2 should be removed and the operators simply used.
>
> Well, compromises are difficult!:) Because I agree with you I
> posted both my solution and Jan D's.
>
> The proposer of the problem spec said that the verbose version met
> his goals best, so I put mine first.
>
> He also said that MyHDL did not warrant a separate language
> section, which Jan&  I believe is incorrect, so I created a new
> language section.
>
> I hope that more hardware teaching problems are proposed on
> rosettacode, and that further suitable dual style solutions are posted.
>
> Jan Coombs

Thanks for the explanation.  I did not notice the second version.

Chris