Re: [myhdl-list] rosettacode submission

[Jan C. <jan...@mu...>]

On 09/05/11 12:34, Christopher Felton wrote:
> On 5/9/2011 6:24 AM, Jan Coombs wrote:
>> On 02/04/11 18:49, Jan Decaluwe wrote:
>>>      . . .
>>> I read that he doesn't agree to give MyHDL it own category.
>>
>> Does this look like a good compromise?
>>
>>      http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Four_bit_adder#MyHDL
>>
>> Any other comments?
>>
>> Jan Coombs
>
> I thought a separate section for MyHDL would not be provided/added?
>
> I still do not prefer the structural approach.  I think the inverter,
> and2, or2, xor2 should be removed and the operators simply used.

Well, compromises are difficult!:) Because I agree with you I 
posted both my solution and Jan D's.

The proposer of the problem spec said that the verbose version met 
his goals best, so I put mine first.

He also said that MyHDL did not warrant a separate language 
section, which Jan & I believe is incorrect, so I created a new 
language section.

I hope that more hardware teaching problems are proposed on 
rosettacode, and that further suitable dual style solutions are posted.

Jan Coombs