Re: [myhdl-list] [Announce] Jan on HDL Design
Brought to you by:
jandecaluwe
From: Jan D. <ja...@ja...> - 2009-11-11 14:06:15
|
Christopher Felton wrote: > Thanks for the link, I am always interested in your thoughts and > opinions. This leads to an interesting question, which is your > preference, MyHDL design or VHDL with modern development tools (hope > that doesn't put you on the spot)? Without constraints I would obviously choose MyHDL as the first option, if only to get the bugs out of my own stuff :-) However, note that even then I will likely need VHDL in the process: as the result from MyHDL, to integrate with 3rd party stuff, to synthesize from. From now on, I would always use Sigasi HDT to support that work. Note also that I could use refactoring e.g. to create hierarchy out of a flat design from the MyHDL convertor. MyHDL and VHDL should not be viewed as opponents. MyHDL's main inspiration is obviously VHDL. MyHDL can be viewed as VHDL's "scripting companion". I have a lot to thank to VHDL, but I've written so much of it already that it's also a simple matter of not getting bored! It's true however that Sigasi HDT makes it much more fun again. It avoids most of the boring stuff. I don't think my own situation is that relevant however. I believe that MyHDL (or at least its concepts) has a good future in the longer term, but there's also the short and medium term to take care of. There you have all kind of constraints, personal preferences, company policies etc. Realistically people in different situations need different solutions, and for me it's not a contradiction to work on various fronts of progress. Jan -- Jan Decaluwe - Resources bvba - http://www.jandecaluwe.com Python as a HDL: http://www.myhdl.org VHDL development, the modern way: http://www.sigasi.com Analog design automation: http://www.mephisto-da.com World-class digital design: http://www.easics.com |