Re: [myhdl-list] Reflections on a MyHDL IP library
Brought to you by:
jandecaluwe
From: Brendan R. <bre...@gm...> - 2006-12-14 00:04:34
|
Jan Decaluwe <jan <at> jandecaluwe.com> writes: > > George Pantazopoulos wrote: > > After doing some explorations, I highly recommend looking at Zope for > > myhdl.org. I've been looking at content management systems, including > > MediaWiki, phpBB, Drupal, Wordpress, and Zope. So far, I think Zope offers > > the most potential. > > Mm, but have you ever used it Several year ago, I have a number of times, > and never really liked it. I found if very complicated and full of jargon. > Also, it has something unpythonic: it's large, not orthogonal and complex. > It was supposed to become the Python killer app, but from what I hear > many pythonistas simply don't like it. > > I never used Plone, but I imagine it has been invented to take away > some complexity from the underlying Zope to make a more usable system. > Still, I fear that the underlying complexity still shines through. > Tom is using it for his site, so he may give good advice here. > > In any case, with the migration to myhdl.org we now have the opportunity > to re-assess the CMS software issue. I think it's wise to take some > time to consider the options carefully, based on a specific list > of must-have and desirable features. > > Jan > I'm definitely not a fan of Zope and, through relation, Plone. It's just too complex. There are a few new python-based CMSs, however, and of these I think that skeletonz (http://orangoo.com/skeletonz/) looks pretty promising, though there's bound to be one for Turbogears or Django as well. Just my $0.02. - Brendan |