Re: [myhdl-list] Licenses and expectations

[George P. <ge...@ga...>]

Martin d Anjou wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Jan Decaluwe wrote:
>   
>> with things like darcs, git, mercurial ... and sometimes I feel like
>> those distributed systems would be more suited to things like myhdl.
>>     
>
> I am just a quiet watcher on this mailing list, so I don't plan on 
> interrupting your discussion. I simply have run into this problem 
> yesterday at my company, and I just want to share a few links:
>
> http://www.bitkeeper.com/Comparisons.Subversion.html
> http://keithp.com/blog/Repository_Formats_Matter.html
> http://www.jukie.net/~bart/blog/git-vs-hg
>
> And some more:
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/5557
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/tutorial.html
>
> Git vs Subversion:
> http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitSvnComparsion
>
> Martin
>   
Thanks a lot for your links, Martin! I'll be taking a closer look, but I 
really like the sound of Git because it's used by the linux kernel 
developers. This tells me that it's well-tested by a rabid bunch of 
developers who are all over the planet.

Rock on,
George
http://www.gammaburst.net