Re: [myhdl-list] Reflections on a MyHDL IP library

[<dan...@we...>]

Jan Decaluwe wrote:
[...]
>> Trac looks more like it is suited for one project group. I think the mix
>> of having different users that can participate in different projects
>> requires quite some tweaking of trac.
> 
> I'm not convinced this is what we need first. Trac seems to be a
> sourceforge done better, in other words, a development management
> system. But this is a general problem, well suited to large scale
> dedicated hosted solutions such as sourceforge itself, or Google Code
> (both with subversion support), or opencores.org.
> 
> I think what we need first is a content management system, well suited to
> create great documentation rapidly, and distribute releases by the
> good old method of tar files.
> 

I see what you are saying and I agree, with a small community as it is
now, there is no need to have a full fledged project management system.
That just adds to the administrative overhead and also can create a lot
of junk.

Now what features do you see that a content management system would add,
that cannot be done with the docuwiki as it is now?


Guenter