Re: [myhdl-list] Bit-wise inversion issue

[Tom D. <TD...@di...>]

On Thursday 28 February 2008 03:36:37 pm Jan Decaluwe wrote:
> Tom Dillon wrote:
> > I don't think the sliced result gets ._nrbits .min or .max set.
> >
> > I think it should, at least for clarification.
>
> Actually a slice returns a new intbv with _nrbits, min and max set.
> (this is the idiomatic way to create an "unsigned", hardware-oriented
> intbv).
>
sorry, I misunderstood the example I ran to come to the conclusion they weren't set. I was wrong, it 
seems fine to me the way it is.