From: Matt B. <ma...@be...> - 2004-04-27 12:18:18
|
My usage of DRAGONS dates from 'The Arc' and has been reasonably common in some circles. I can accept that the world has moved on a little and it may be worth updating to a more common version. I suggest: 1) We leave all uncataloged DRAGONS as they are... 2) We sort out a cataloging system. I think the SourceForge bug tracker could be used, but is perhaps a little cumbersome. Any better suggestions? 3) As each DRAGON is catalogued we turn it into a "TODO" or "FIXME". 4) We consider a release policy at some stage... Matt At 13:05 27/04/2004, Stuart Cunningham wrote: >Yes. I think the most important cataloguing would be into those areas >where there are potential bugs (or known bad behaviour) and those areas >where there is missing functionality or optimisation needed. Perhaps >during such a process we should mark such areas with "FIXME" and "TODO" >respectively. > >Large projects like Gnome don't release a minor version until all >FIXMEs are fixed, and won't release a major version until all TODOs >are addressed. > >Stuart > >On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 12:54, Oliver Morgan wrote: > > More to the point: we need a concerted program to catalog them, eliminate > > the worst, and eventually resolve all of them - whatever they are called. > > > > Cataloguing them is easier if they are all marked the same way. Consistency > > is good. "dragons" is as good as anything for now. > > > > Oliver > > > > |