From: Nicolai L. <ja...@li...> - 2007-03-26 16:23:16
|
William Thompson wrote: > I'm not on the list, keep me in CC. ... > Come to think about it. I did put "fork no" in my munin.conf. Everytime > munin would run, it would eat all cpu time on the machine. In general "fork no" should not be combined with installs of any size, as this could cause dips in the graphs more easily. > It would be nice if it would fork only for multiple addresses, not multiple > nodes. (I have many snmp devices monitored) snmp in many is quite CPU-heavy to interogate an could cause the CPU-maxing. There is a posibility of swapping snmpget and snmpwalk with snmpbulkget and snmpbulkwalk if you have those programs - they have less overhead. There is a need for writing recomandations for writing efficient snmp plugins, but this has not been done. Nicolai |