From: Vítězslav K. <vit...@gm...> - 2008-06-22 21:01:02
|
Sven Tore Iversen píše v Pá 20. 06. 2008 v 20:30 +0200: > Can you see any output in the event log? Try setting debug level to 4, > and see if you can find any helpful information there. Thanks for tip, the problem really shows in event log ('invalid counter' IIRC). Counter name _must_ be in local language and so far SNMAgent has no problem with Czech (well, there's something wrong with CPU C1 time, which still gives null, but I'll try debug level 4 next week). Also I'm afraid native CPU plugin gives zero value on localized (Czech) Windows, but at least cpunew (based on perfmon counter) works when fed with localized counter name. CPU time is pretty strange stuff anyway, as I've seen 'idle' 94 together with 'user' 7.6 (not mentioning != 0 'system' and 'privileged' count) at the same time, which gives > 100 % cpu time total. Very "nice" of Microsoft, it gives really fuzzy and unclean CPU time graphs <sigh>. > I'm working in a new version with support for shell scrips (vb-script) > to support the plugins from the (abandoned?) project from Andreas > Kreisl. I should also trow in a setup utility to make the configuration > easier, by enumerating possible PerfMon values and generating config files. Sound really nice, I'd be glad to test it. > As you can see from the release cycle I've not been able to put much > time into the project lately. Since 0.220 we've used it in our > production systems and without knows issues. "Too bad" for the project, > since I've not been able to use much company hours into further > development after that. So far I had to restart the snmagent service only once, as it took 100 % cpu time (probably) due to misconfigured counter. I started to evaluate it on least critical systems and so far it behaves nicely, at least no memory leaks. Thanks again for sharing this useful piece of software. Vit |