You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(17) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(42) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(41) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(5) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
(10) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2024 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2025 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: <ra...@bi...> - 2015-05-22 15:56:30
|
Hi, I am Ramya and i am new to this tool. I am not so good at command line usage but followed the commands specified in the tool for installation. I did find an error while installing the tool. it says no g++ GNU compiler found. When i am trying to install g++ it is showing some errors. Can you please help me out with this? Regards, Ramya |
|
From: Adam P. <aph...@gm...> - 2015-05-12 15:11:37
|
Hi Ruth, Unfortunately there is not an easy way to do this. The location of the alignment gaps is contained in the .delta file, which you could parse to create your mapping (the file format is described in the manual). Other alternatives: If you only care about difference positions, the show-snps program will report all SNPs and Indels w/ coordinates in both sequences. Or the show-aligns will dump a textual alignment representation which you could also parse. Best, -Adam On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Miller, Ruth <Rut...@bc...> wrote: > Hi, > > I have used NUCmer to align contigs I have generated from next-generation > sequencing data to a reference. > > I would like to create a dictionary which contains the position of every > base in the query contigs in the reference. I hoped I might be able to do > this using the .coords file, however, although you can tell the start and > end of every contig compared to the reference, it does not provide the > positions of the gaps, so you cannot tell the exact alignment of each > position in the query contig compared to the reference. > Is there any way to get the exact details of the alignment using > NUCmer/MUMmer, from which I could parse the 1:1 relationship of every > position in the query contigs compared to the reference? > > Thanks, > > Ruth > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud > Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications > Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights > Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y > _______________________________________________ > MUMmer-help mailing list > MUM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mummer-help > > |
|
From: Miller, R. <Rut...@bc...> - 2015-05-05 20:59:18
|
Hi, I have used NUCmer to align contigs I have generated from next-generation sequencing data to a reference. I would like to create a dictionary which contains the position of every base in the query contigs in the reference. I hoped I might be able to do this using the .coords file, however, although you can tell the start and end of every contig compared to the reference, it does not provide the positions of the gaps, so you cannot tell the exact alignment of each position in the query contig compared to the reference. Is there any way to get the exact details of the alignment using NUCmer/MUMmer, from which I could parse the 1:1 relationship of every position in the query contigs compared to the reference? Thanks, Ruth |
|
From: Ramesh k. R. <ram...@gm...> - 2015-04-30 16:45:28
|
Hello, Is it possible to assign number of cores to nucmer or mummer? Thanks Ramesh |
|
From: Ramesh k. R. <ram...@gm...> - 2015-04-29 23:11:23
|
Hi Adam, It worked! Thank you, you saved me.. Ramesh On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Adam Phillippy <aph...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > The size of your reference sequence is larger than is supported by > default. You can either break your reference into multiple files and run > each individually, or recompile the mummer package with: > > > make clean > > make CPPFLAGS="-O3 -DSIXTYFOURBITS" > > > To increase maximum reference size permitted. > > Best, > -Adam > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Ramesh krishnan Ramasamy < > ram...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> I'm consistently getting following error while running both nucmer and >> mummer. >> >> $ nucmer -maxmatch -c 100 -p nucmer ../reference.fasta ../query.fa >> 1: PREPARING DATA >> 2,3: RUNNING mummer AND CREATING CLUSTERS >> # reading input file "nucmer.ntref" of length 712946597 >> # construct suffix tree for sequence of length 712946597 >> # (maximum reference length is 536870908) >> # (maximum query length is 4294967295) >> # process 7129465 characters per dot >> /usr/bin/mummer: suffix tree construction failed: textlen=712946597 >> larger than maximal textlen=536870908 >> ERROR: mummer and/or mgaps returned non-zero >> >> To test myself, I simply pulled out few contigs from the reference genome >> and used as query sequence. Unfortunately, I'm still running into the same >> error. >> >> I appreciate any kind of help. >> >> Thanks >> Ramesh >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud >> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications >> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights >> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. >> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y >> _______________________________________________ >> MUMmer-help mailing list >> MUM...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mummer-help >> >> > |
|
From: Adam P. <aph...@gm...> - 2015-04-29 17:58:41
|
Hi, The size of your reference sequence is larger than is supported by default. You can either break your reference into multiple files and run each individually, or recompile the mummer package with: > make clean > make CPPFLAGS="-O3 -DSIXTYFOURBITS" To increase maximum reference size permitted. Best, -Adam On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Ramesh krishnan Ramasamy < ram...@gm...> wrote: > Hi everyone, > I'm consistently getting following error while running both nucmer and > mummer. > > $ nucmer -maxmatch -c 100 -p nucmer ../reference.fasta ../query.fa > 1: PREPARING DATA > 2,3: RUNNING mummer AND CREATING CLUSTERS > # reading input file "nucmer.ntref" of length 712946597 > # construct suffix tree for sequence of length 712946597 > # (maximum reference length is 536870908) > # (maximum query length is 4294967295) > # process 7129465 characters per dot > /usr/bin/mummer: suffix tree construction failed: textlen=712946597 larger > than maximal textlen=536870908 > ERROR: mummer and/or mgaps returned non-zero > > To test myself, I simply pulled out few contigs from the reference genome > and used as query sequence. Unfortunately, I'm still running into the same > error. > > I appreciate any kind of help. > > Thanks > Ramesh > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud > Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications > Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights > Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y > _______________________________________________ > MUMmer-help mailing list > MUM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mummer-help > > |
|
From: Ramesh k. R. <ram...@gm...> - 2015-04-29 02:18:45
|
Hi everyone, I'm consistently getting following error while running both nucmer and mummer. $ nucmer -maxmatch -c 100 -p nucmer ../reference.fasta ../query.fa 1: PREPARING DATA 2,3: RUNNING mummer AND CREATING CLUSTERS # reading input file "nucmer.ntref" of length 712946597 # construct suffix tree for sequence of length 712946597 # (maximum reference length is 536870908) # (maximum query length is 4294967295) # process 7129465 characters per dot /usr/bin/mummer: suffix tree construction failed: textlen=712946597 larger than maximal textlen=536870908 ERROR: mummer and/or mgaps returned non-zero To test myself, I simply pulled out few contigs from the reference genome and used as query sequence. Unfortunately, I'm still running into the same error. I appreciate any kind of help. Thanks Ramesh |
|
From: Adam P. <aph...@gm...> - 2015-04-27 17:53:55
|
Hi, Probably a gnuplot 5 compatibility issue. I've added this to the bug tracker. Gnuplot v4 is currently recommended for mummer, I have not tested with v5. Best, -Adam On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Adriaan Vanheule < Adr...@ug...> wrote: > Hi all, > > > > I am aligning genomes with MUMmer installed on Cygwin, running on my > Windows 64 bit laptop. The NUCmer and delta-filter steps work fine, but I > run into problems when I try to run mummerplot. Regardless of the options I > use (--png, default), I get the following errors: > > > > gnuplot 5.0 patchlevel 0 > > Writing filtered delta file out.filter > > Reading delta file out.delta.m > > Writing plot files out.fplot, out.rplot > > Writing gnuplot script out.gp > > Rendering plot out.png > > > > set mouse clipboardformat "[%.0f, %.0f]" > > ^ > > "out.gp", line 27: wrong option > > > > WARNING: Unable to run 'gnuplot out.gp', > > > > This seems like it could be more a gnuplot error than a mummerplot error, > but I thought I would give it a try anyway. Does anyone know how I could > resolve this? > > > > Kind regards > > Adriaan > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT > Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard > Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live > exercises > http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- > event?utm_ > source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF > _______________________________________________ > MUMmer-help mailing list > MUM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mummer-help > > |
|
From: Adam P. <aph...@gm...> - 2015-04-27 17:52:50
|
Hi Sanjit, The best parameters depend on how related your scaffold is to the reference assembly (same genome / species?) and how fragmented your contigs are. Nucmer will not align through large stretches of N's, so if your scaffold consists of a fasta file with contigs separated by N's, you will get fragmented alignments as a result. As I suggested previously, I would run delta-filter to select the best alignments for your scaffold versus the reference genome. Then, from inspecting the coordinates of the remaining matches you should be able to determine the extents of your scaffold mapped to the reference. -c 100 is relatively small, so for a 3GB genome, you will get a large number of repeat-induced matches. If you are dealing with the same species, I would increase -l to 50, and -c to your minimum contig size (say between 1000 or 5000), and increase the -g parameter to a few hundred. Best, -Adam On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Sanjit Singh Batra <san...@gm...> wrote: > Hi! > > I asked this question as a response to the show-tilling thread, as you > suggested. Although they are unrelated, it would be great to hear any > suggestions from you regarding this. Any help with this problem will > greatly reduce my computational off-time. > > Thanks again! > sanjit > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Adam Phillippy <aph...@gm...> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> I see I picked up a separate question you had regarding show-tiling, >> happy to answer questions in that more recent thread if you have further >> questions. >> >> Best, >> -Adam >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Sanjit Singh Batra < >> san...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> Hey! >>> >>> I have a 30Mb scaffold that was assembled using optical maps. I would >>> like to align it to a 3Gb long reference assembly. Given the method through >>> which this scaffold was constructed, it should align to a region in the >>> reference, roughly the same size as itself. >>> >>> I am currently running nucmer with the -c 100 flag, and I get a very >>> large number of fragmented alignments, the longest of which is under 1Mb. >>> Is there any way I can alter the flags to get a larger, less fragmented >>> alignment, for this particular case? >>> >>> Any suggestions are appreciated. Thanks! >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT >>> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard >>> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live >>> exercises >>> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- >>> event?utm_ >>> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MUMmer-help mailing list >>> MUM...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mummer-help >>> >>> >> > |
|
From: Adriaan V. <Adr...@UG...> - 2015-04-22 15:01:49
|
Hi all,
I am aligning genomes with MUMmer installed on Cygwin, running on my Windows 64 bit laptop. The NUCmer and delta-filter steps work fine, but I run into problems when I try to run mummerplot. Regardless of the options I use (--png, default), I get the following errors:
gnuplot 5.0 patchlevel 0
Writing filtered delta file out.filter
Reading delta file out.delta.m
Writing plot files out.fplot, out.rplot
Writing gnuplot script out.gp
Rendering plot out.png
set mouse clipboardformat "[%.0f, %.0f]"
^
"out.gp", line 27: wrong option
WARNING: Unable to run 'gnuplot out.gp',
This seems like it could be more a gnuplot error than a mummerplot error, but I thought I would give it a try anyway. Does anyone know how I could resolve this?
Kind regards
Adriaan
|
|
From: Sanjit S. B. <san...@gm...> - 2015-04-21 22:39:31
|
Hey! I have a 30Mb scaffold that was assembled using optical maps. I would like to align it to a 3Gb long reference assembly. Given the method through which this scaffold was constructed, it should align to a region in the reference, roughly the same size as itself. I am currently running nucmer with the -c 100 flag, and I get a very large number of fragmented alignments, the longest of which is under 1Mb. Is there any way I can alter the flags to get a larger, less fragmented alignment, for this particular case? Any suggestions are appreciated. Thanks! On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Adam Phillippy <aph...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Sanjit, > There is no easy way to switch the reference and query once the alignment > is computed. > > What do you intend to use show-tiling for? The 'delta-filter' program can > be more flexible and useful for some tasks. If you run 'delta-filter -r' it > will select the best alignments for each of your smaller reference > sequences mapped to the larger query. If you run 'delta-filter -q' it will > select the best alignment covering each region of your large query, which > will (in effect) be similar to a tiling path of the best reference > alignments across the query. > > Hope this helps, > -Adam > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Sanjit Singh Batra < > san...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hey! >> >> As mentioned in the manual, I switched the reference and the query while >> using nucmer, since the reference was very large, and much larger than the >> query. Now, I would like to run the show-tiling module on the resulting >> delta file(This feature was the primary reason I started using mummer). >> However, since the reference and query are switched, it tiles the reference >> chromosomes over contigs, which is not what is desired. >> >> So, is there a script that can switch the reference and the query in a >> delta file? >> >> Any suggestions are greatly appreciated. Thanks for your time! >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT >> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard >> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live >> exercises >> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- >> event?utm_ >> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF >> _______________________________________________ >> MUMmer-help mailing list >> MUM...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mummer-help >> >> > |
|
From: Adam P. <aph...@gm...> - 2015-04-21 15:25:35
|
Hi Sanjit, There is no easy way to switch the reference and query once the alignment is computed. What do you intend to use show-tiling for? The 'delta-filter' program can be more flexible and useful for some tasks. If you run 'delta-filter -r' it will select the best alignments for each of your smaller reference sequences mapped to the larger query. If you run 'delta-filter -q' it will select the best alignment covering each region of your large query, which will (in effect) be similar to a tiling path of the best reference alignments across the query. Hope this helps, -Adam On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Sanjit Singh Batra <san...@gm...> wrote: > Hey! > > As mentioned in the manual, I switched the reference and the query while > using nucmer, since the reference was very large, and much larger than the > query. Now, I would like to run the show-tiling module on the resulting > delta file(This feature was the primary reason I started using mummer). > However, since the reference and query are switched, it tiles the reference > chromosomes over contigs, which is not what is desired. > > So, is there a script that can switch the reference and the query in a > delta file? > > Any suggestions are greatly appreciated. Thanks for your time! > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT > Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard > Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live > exercises > http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- > event?utm_ > source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF > _______________________________________________ > MUMmer-help mailing list > MUM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mummer-help > > |
|
From: Sanjit S. B. <san...@gm...> - 2015-04-15 01:45:43
|
Hey! As mentioned in the manual, I switched the reference and the query while using nucmer, since the reference was very large, and much larger than the query. Now, I would like to run the show-tiling module on the resulting delta file(This feature was the primary reason I started using mummer). However, since the reference and query are switched, it tiles the reference chromosomes over contigs, which is not what is desired. So, is there a script that can switch the reference and the query in a delta file? Any suggestions are greatly appreciated. Thanks for your time! |
|
From: Sanjit S. B. <san...@gm...> - 2015-04-10 09:01:03
|
Hey! I have a 30Mb scaffold that was assembled using optical maps. I would like to align it to a 3Gb long reference assembly. Given the method through which this scaffold was constructed, it should align to a region in the reference, roughly the same size as itself. I am currently running nucmer with the -c 100 flag, and I get a very large number of fragmented alignments, the longest of which is under 1Mb. Is there any way I can alter the flags to get a larger, less fragmented alignment, for this particular case? Any suggestions are appreciated. Thanks! |
|
From: Adam P. <am...@um...> - 2015-04-03 13:30:01
|
Hello Hui, For mapping contigs to a chromosome, I typically suggest delta-filter -q. That will filter based on an alignment score that is computed as (length * identity) to identify the best alignments for each contig. Have you overcome your problems running the delta-filter program? Best, -Adam On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 3:18 AM, che...@ge... < che...@ge...> wrote: > Dear sir, > > Good days for you. > > Sorry to trouble you, however, we meet problem when we used nucmer. > > We want to link the contig into chromsome basing on finished genome. Then > we run nucmer packages of mumer. > After aligning, It is so hard for us to choose a standard to filter the > alignment (Coverage or aligning length ???) > > Would you like to give us some suggestions? > > many thanks for your help > best regards > yours sincerely, hui > > > ------------------------------ > *----------------* > Junhui Chen > BGI TECH > *Tel: +86-131-2890-7008 <%2B86-131-2890-7008> * > *QQ: 751962963 * > *Email: che...@ge... <http://chenjunhui@genomics.cn>* > Main Building 10F│Beishan Industrial Zone│Yantian District│Shenzhen 518083 > │China > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, > sponsored > by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for > all > things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs > to > news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the > conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ > _______________________________________________ > MUMmer-help mailing list > MUM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mummer-help > > |
|
From: <che...@ge...> - 2015-04-03 07:19:00
|
Dear sir, Good days for you. Sorry to trouble you, however, we meet problem when we used nucmer. We want to link the contig into chromsome basing on finished genome. Then we run nucmer packages of mumer.After aligning, ?It is so hard for us to choose a standard to filter the alignment (Coverage or aligning length ???) Would you like to give us some suggestions? many thanks for your helpbest regardsyours sincerely, hui? ----------------Junhui ChenBGI TECHTel: +86-131-2890-7008?QQ: 751962963?Email:?che...@ge... Building 10F│Beishan Industrial Zone│Yantian District│Shenzhen 518083│China? |
|
From: <che...@ge...> - 2015-04-03 07:04:50
|
confirm 8dd1127d8ff2e4050d0eea18a0ba9c28c93db7e6 ----------------Junhui ChenBGI TECHTel: +86-131-2890-7008 QQ: 751962963 Email: che...@ge... Building 10F│Beishan Industrial Zone│Yantian District│Shenzhen 518083│China From: che...@ge...: 2015-04-01 18:51To: mummer-helpSubject: Fw: Re: confirm 8dd1127d8ff2e4050d0eea18a0ba9c28c93db7e6 ----------------Junhui ChenBGI TECHTel: +86-131-2890-7008 QQ: 751962963 Email: che...@ge... Building 10F│Beishan Industrial Zone│Yantian District│Shenzhen 518083│China From: che...@ge...: 2015-04-01 18:50To: mum...@li...: Re: confirm 8dd1127d8ff2e4050d0eea18a0ba9c28c93db7e6 confirm 8dd1127d8ff2e4050d0eea18a0ba9c28c93db7e6I cut qury files and then run nucmer agianst genome. then I cat the result of nucmer(*.delta), and run dealta-filter on cat files. However, it warned: /opt/blc/genome/biosoft/MUMmer-3.22/delta-filter -q test0ERROR: Could not parse delta file, test0 error no: 400 I do not know whywould you like to give us some help?many thaks.best regards for you. ----------------Junhui ChenBGI TECHTel: +86-131-2890-7008 QQ: 751962963 Email: che...@ge... Building 10F│Beishan Industrial Zone│Yantian District│Shenzhen 518083│China From: mum...@li...: 2015-04-01 18:45To: che...@ge...: confirm 8dd1127d8ff2e4050d0eea18a0ba9c28c93db7e6Mailing list subscription confirmation notice for mailing list MUMmer-help We have received a request from 172.29.29.1 for subscription of your email address, "che...@ge...", to the mum...@li... mailing list. To confirm that you want to be added to this mailing list, simply reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact. Or visit this web page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/confirm/mummer-help/8dd1127d8ff2e4050d0eea18a0ba9c28c93db7e6 Or include the following line -- and only the following line -- in a message to mum...@li...: confirm 8dd1127d8ff2e4050d0eea18a0ba9c28c93db7e6 Note that simply sending a `reply' to this message should work from most mail readers, since that usually leaves the Subject: line in the right form (additional "Re:" text in the Subject: is okay). If you do not wish to be subscribed to this list, please simply disregard this message. If you think you are being maliciously subscribed to the list, or have any other questions, send them to mum...@li.... |
|
From: <che...@ge...> - 2015-04-01 10:52:07
|
----------------Junhui ChenBGI TECHTel: +86-131-2890-7008 QQ: 751962963 Email: che...@ge... Building 10F│Beishan Industrial Zone│Yantian District│Shenzhen 518083│China From: che...@ge...: 2015-04-01 18:50To: mum...@li...: Re: confirm 8dd1127d8ff2e4050d0eea18a0ba9c28c93db7e6 confirm 8dd1127d8ff2e4050d0eea18a0ba9c28c93db7e6I cut qury files and then run nucmer agianst genome. then I cat the result of nucmer(*.delta), and run dealta-filter on cat files. However, it warned: /opt/blc/genome/biosoft/MUMmer-3.22/delta-filter -q test0ERROR: Could not parse delta file, test0 error no: 400 I do not know whywould you like to give us some help?many thaks.best regards for you. ----------------Junhui ChenBGI TECHTel: +86-131-2890-7008 QQ: 751962963 Email: che...@ge... Building 10F│Beishan Industrial Zone│Yantian District│Shenzhen 518083│China From: mum...@li...: 2015-04-01 18:45To: che...@ge...: confirm 8dd1127d8ff2e4050d0eea18a0ba9c28c93db7e6Mailing list subscription confirmation notice for mailing list MUMmer-help We have received a request from 172.29.29.1 for subscription of your email address, "che...@ge...", to the mum...@li... mailing list. To confirm that you want to be added to this mailing list, simply reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact. Or visit this web page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/confirm/mummer-help/8dd1127d8ff2e4050d0eea18a0ba9c28c93db7e6 Or include the following line -- and only the following line -- in a message to mum...@li...: confirm 8dd1127d8ff2e4050d0eea18a0ba9c28c93db7e6 Note that simply sending a `reply' to this message should work from most mail readers, since that usually leaves the Subject: line in the right form (additional "Re:" text in the Subject: is okay). If you do not wish to be subscribed to this list, please simply disregard this message. If you think you are being maliciously subscribed to the list, or have any other questions, send them to mum...@li.... |
|
From: Diogo C. <dio...@gm...> - 2015-03-03 16:56:50
|
That’s what I thought. I aligned my reference to a very similar (same genus, same species, different strain bacterium) and I got a very high similarity and a very high percentage of aligned bases. Thanks for the tip on nucmer. I’ll explore that some more to fit my needs. ---------- Diogo Camacho e: dio...@gm... p: (617) 945-4383 > On Mar 3, 2015, at 11:48 AM, Adam Phillippy <aph...@gm...> wrote: > > You are reading that correctly. With default options, Nucmer's sensitivity is tuned for alignments >90% identity. Your genomes are likely too divergent to align well w/ these parameters. If they are small bacterial genomes you could try something like: > > nucmer -maxmatch -l 18 -c 50 -g 200 > > To improve sensitivity, but in general the tool is not well suited for sensitive alignments. > > -Adam > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Diogo Camacho <dio...@gm...> wrote: > A follow up to my earlier question: when I looked at the output from dnadiff (the .report file) I saw this: > > [Bases] > TotalBases 1837281 2427048 > AlignedBases 47871(2.61%) 47261(1.95%) > UnalignedBases 1789410(97.39%) 2379787(98.05%) > > [Alignments] > 1-to-1 28 28 > TotalLength 23369 23403 > AvgLength 834.61 835.82 > AvgIdentity 83.96 83.96 > > M-to-M 67 67 > TotalLength 86329 86650 > AvgLength 1288.49 1293.28 > AvgIdentity 87.96 87.96 > > > Does this output mean that I’m only really aligning the query genome to roughly 3% of my reference genome, and that alignment has an average identity of 80%+? Or am I reading this wrong? > > Thanks! > > > > ---------- > Diogo Camacho > e: dio...@gm... > p: (617) 945-4383 > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 2015, at 10:30 AM, Adam Phillippy <aph...@gm...> wrote: > > > > Hi Diogo, > > If you run the 'dnadiff' script that comes with MUMmer it will generate a .report file that will include global similarity metrics based on Nucmer alignments. > > > > Best, > > -Adam > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Diogo Camacho <dio...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is a very naive, simple question, but I can’t seem to locate a good answer for it on the manual. I have a set of bacterial genomes that I want to align against a different (single) bacterial genome. The obvious tool to do this seems to be NUCmer and I did a test run of 1 genome against the “reference” genome by doing: > > > > nucmer -maxmatch -p test-output <REFERENCE GENOME> <GENOME TO BE COMPARED> > > > > NUCmer runs fine and when I do show-coords I get the table with the alignments and the respective identity between the 2 genomes I am comparing. But what I would like would be to get a single, global, percent identity score between the 2 genomes, as I basically want to compare the two genomes at a global level. Is there a simple way to do this using the MUMer suite? > > > > Many thanks! > > > > > > Best, > > d. > > > > > > > > ---------- > > Diogo Camacho > > e: dio...@gm... > > p: (617) 945-4383 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored > > by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all > > things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to > > news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the > > conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ > > _______________________________________________ > > MUMmer-help mailing list > > MUM...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mummer-help > > > > |
|
From: Adam P. <aph...@gm...> - 2015-03-03 16:48:51
|
You are reading that correctly. With default options, Nucmer's sensitivity is tuned for alignments >90% identity. Your genomes are likely too divergent to align well w/ these parameters. If they are small bacterial genomes you could try something like: nucmer -maxmatch -l 18 -c 50 -g 200 To improve sensitivity, but in general the tool is not well suited for sensitive alignments. -Adam On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Diogo Camacho <dio...@gm... > wrote: > A follow up to my earlier question: when I looked at the output from > dnadiff (the .report file) I saw this: > > [Bases] > TotalBases 1837281 2427048 > AlignedBases 47871(2.61%) 47261(1.95%) > UnalignedBases 1789410(97.39%) 2379787(98.05%) > > [Alignments] > 1-to-1 28 28 > TotalLength 23369 23403 > AvgLength 834.61 835.82 > AvgIdentity 83.96 83.96 > > M-to-M 67 67 > TotalLength 86329 86650 > AvgLength 1288.49 1293.28 > AvgIdentity 87.96 87.96 > > > Does this output mean that I’m only really aligning the query genome to > roughly 3% of my reference genome, and that alignment has an average > identity of 80%+? Or am I reading this wrong? > > Thanks! > > > > ---------- > Diogo Camacho > e: dio...@gm... > p: (617) 945-4383 > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 2015, at 10:30 AM, Adam Phillippy <aph...@gm...> > wrote: > > > > Hi Diogo, > > If you run the 'dnadiff' script that comes with MUMmer it will generate > a .report file that will include global similarity metrics based on Nucmer > alignments. > > > > Best, > > -Adam > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Diogo Camacho < > dio...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is a very naive, simple question, but I can’t seem to locate a good > answer for it on the manual. I have a set of bacterial genomes that I want > to align against a different (single) bacterial genome. The obvious tool > to do this seems to be NUCmer and I did a test run of 1 genome against the > “reference” genome by doing: > > > > nucmer -maxmatch -p test-output <REFERENCE GENOME> <GENOME TO BE > COMPARED> > > > > NUCmer runs fine and when I do show-coords I get the table with the > alignments and the respective identity between the 2 genomes I am > comparing. But what I would like would be to get a single, global, percent > identity score between the 2 genomes, as I basically want to compare the > two genomes at a global level. Is there a simple way to do this using the > MUMer suite? > > > > Many thanks! > > > > > > Best, > > d. > > > > > > > > ---------- > > Diogo Camacho > > e: dio...@gm... > > p: (617) 945-4383 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, > sponsored > > by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub > for all > > things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership > blogs to > > news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the > > conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ > > _______________________________________________ > > MUMmer-help mailing list > > MUM...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mummer-help > > > > |
|
From: Diogo C. <dio...@gm...> - 2015-03-03 16:31:20
|
A follow up to my earlier question: when I looked at the output from dnadiff (the .report file) I saw this: [Bases] TotalBases 1837281 2427048 AlignedBases 47871(2.61%) 47261(1.95%) UnalignedBases 1789410(97.39%) 2379787(98.05%) [Alignments] 1-to-1 28 28 TotalLength 23369 23403 AvgLength 834.61 835.82 AvgIdentity 83.96 83.96 M-to-M 67 67 TotalLength 86329 86650 AvgLength 1288.49 1293.28 AvgIdentity 87.96 87.96 Does this output mean that I’m only really aligning the query genome to roughly 3% of my reference genome, and that alignment has an average identity of 80%+? Or am I reading this wrong? Thanks! ---------- Diogo Camacho e: dio...@gm... p: (617) 945-4383 > On Mar 3, 2015, at 10:30 AM, Adam Phillippy <aph...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi Diogo, > If you run the 'dnadiff' script that comes with MUMmer it will generate a .report file that will include global similarity metrics based on Nucmer alignments. > > Best, > -Adam > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Diogo Camacho <dio...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > This is a very naive, simple question, but I can’t seem to locate a good answer for it on the manual. I have a set of bacterial genomes that I want to align against a different (single) bacterial genome. The obvious tool to do this seems to be NUCmer and I did a test run of 1 genome against the “reference” genome by doing: > > nucmer -maxmatch -p test-output <REFERENCE GENOME> <GENOME TO BE COMPARED> > > NUCmer runs fine and when I do show-coords I get the table with the alignments and the respective identity between the 2 genomes I am comparing. But what I would like would be to get a single, global, percent identity score between the 2 genomes, as I basically want to compare the two genomes at a global level. Is there a simple way to do this using the MUMer suite? > > Many thanks! > > > Best, > d. > > > > ---------- > Diogo Camacho > e: dio...@gm... > p: (617) 945-4383 > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored > by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all > things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to > news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the > conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ > _______________________________________________ > MUMmer-help mailing list > MUM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mummer-help > |
|
From: Diogo C. <dio...@gm...> - 2015-03-03 15:51:45
|
Hi Adam, Thanks for the tip. Just tried it out and looking at the .report file I can see the average identity between the 2 genomes. Thanks! Best, d. ---------- Diogo Camacho e: dio...@gm... p: (617) 945-4383 > On Mar 3, 2015, at 10:30 AM, Adam Phillippy <aph...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi Diogo, > If you run the 'dnadiff' script that comes with MUMmer it will generate a .report file that will include global similarity metrics based on Nucmer alignments. > > Best, > -Adam > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Diogo Camacho <dio...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > This is a very naive, simple question, but I can’t seem to locate a good answer for it on the manual. I have a set of bacterial genomes that I want to align against a different (single) bacterial genome. The obvious tool to do this seems to be NUCmer and I did a test run of 1 genome against the “reference” genome by doing: > > nucmer -maxmatch -p test-output <REFERENCE GENOME> <GENOME TO BE COMPARED> > > NUCmer runs fine and when I do show-coords I get the table with the alignments and the respective identity between the 2 genomes I am comparing. But what I would like would be to get a single, global, percent identity score between the 2 genomes, as I basically want to compare the two genomes at a global level. Is there a simple way to do this using the MUMer suite? > > Many thanks! > > > Best, > d. > > > > ---------- > Diogo Camacho > e: dio...@gm... > p: (617) 945-4383 > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored > by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all > things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to > news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the > conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ > _______________________________________________ > MUMmer-help mailing list > MUM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mummer-help > |
|
From: Adam P. <aph...@gm...> - 2015-03-03 15:30:38
|
Hi Diogo, If you run the 'dnadiff' script that comes with MUMmer it will generate a .report file that will include global similarity metrics based on Nucmer alignments. Best, -Adam On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Diogo Camacho <dio...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > This is a very naive, simple question, but I can’t seem to locate a good > answer for it on the manual. I have a set of bacterial genomes that I want > to align against a different (single) bacterial genome. The obvious tool > to do this seems to be NUCmer and I did a test run of 1 genome against the > “reference” genome by doing: > > nucmer -maxmatch -p test-output <REFERENCE GENOME> <GENOME TO BE COMPARED> > > NUCmer runs fine and when I do show-coords I get the table with the > alignments and the respective identity between the 2 genomes I am > comparing. But what I would like would be to get a single, global, percent > identity score between the 2 genomes, as I basically want to compare the > two genomes at a global level. Is there a simple way to do this using the > MUMer suite? > > Many thanks! > > > Best, > d. > > > > ---------- > Diogo Camacho > e: dio...@gm... > p: (617) 945-4383 > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, > sponsored > by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for > all > things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs > to > news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the > conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ > _______________________________________________ > MUMmer-help mailing list > MUM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mummer-help > |
|
From: Diogo C. <dio...@gm...> - 2015-03-03 14:50:20
|
Hi, This is a very naive, simple question, but I can’t seem to locate a good answer for it on the manual. I have a set of bacterial genomes that I want to align against a different (single) bacterial genome. The obvious tool to do this seems to be NUCmer and I did a test run of 1 genome against the “reference” genome by doing: nucmer -maxmatch -p test-output <REFERENCE GENOME> <GENOME TO BE COMPARED> NUCmer runs fine and when I do show-coords I get the table with the alignments and the respective identity between the 2 genomes I am comparing. But what I would like would be to get a single, global, percent identity score between the 2 genomes, as I basically want to compare the two genomes at a global level. Is there a simple way to do this using the MUMer suite? Many thanks! Best, d. ---------- Diogo Camacho e: dio...@gm... p: (617) 945-4383 |
|
From: Adam P. <aph...@gm...> - 2015-02-23 22:00:02
|
Hi Chris,
Have seen this error on the MUMmer list before. Here was the solution:
"Figured this one out - had a bracket in my folder name!"
Likely some sort of filename / environment issue.
-Adam
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Wymant, Chris <c.w...@im...>
wrote:
> Dear MUMmer help,
>
> >From a clean install of MUMmer, running
> $ nucmer --maxmatch test1.fa test2.fa
> gives the output
> 1: PREPARING DATA
> sh: 1: Syntax error: "(" unexpected
> ERROR: prenuc returned non-zero
> regardless of what is in the fasta files; for example just
> >MySequence
> ACTG
> still gives the error. Changing the --maxmatch option does not help.
> Please advise.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris Wymant
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
> from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
> with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
> Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=190641631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> MUMmer-help mailing list
> MUM...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mummer-help
>
>
|