|
From: Peter B. <bi...@ac...> - 2014-11-27 17:09:30
|
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Paul Sokolovsky <pm...@gm...> wrote: > Hello Peter, > > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 06:23:40 -0600 > Peter Bigot <bi...@ac...> wrote: > > > In the gcc_rh branch the only change I made was to remove the execute > > bits from the header files and move the contents back to the include > > directory from the msp430-gcc-support-files directory they're now > > in. Note that the TI versions now use Unix line endings, so to > > identify content differences from old versions you need to add -b or > > -w to the diff command. > > Ah, too bad they were not dos2unix'ed before the import! > My intent is that these be archival; I'll muck with metadata like execute bits and the containing directory name in an attempt to maintain consistency across releases, but I won't change the content of individual files. > > And here's something I wanted to ask for a while - did you or somebody > else considered adding msp430 toolchain to http://crosstool-ng.org/ ? > Nope. I'm not interested in more things to maintain; my solution for msp430elf toolchain building is described here: http://pabigot.github.io/bsp430/msp430elf.html That page includes a link to the most recent version of my build script posted here some months ago. If somebody wants to use that as a basis for other work, feel free. I don't think it's got enough creativity to warrant a copyright and in any case it'd fall under the BSD-3-Clause licensing of BSP430. Peter |