Re: [Mratc-developers] [my status]

[<aqu...@ya...>]

--- Aquila Deus <aqu...@ya...> wrote: 
> One question: If our ATC only helps flights to avoid collision and let them
> decide what course they follow (and there is no pre-defined course), we may
> not
> need to manage the course change at all. Besides, if the flights decide the
> course by itself, it may hit flights or objects which are not managed by our
> ATC (we can know this from radar though), and the possibility may be bigger
> than hitting managed flights. Are you sure to let the flights decide the
> course
> by themselved? Isn't this too different from current ATC?

I think the current ATC works in this way:

- All available courses are already defined (could be added or removed though)
- Generally the courses are not used or affected by any unmanaged flights.
- The flight must register the courses it wants and the range of time it will
need to go though, before it flys.
- If it wants to change the course when flying, it has to request the change
first.

* Some flights may have higher priority to obtain courses they want.
* The ATC doesn't check collision continually, because potential collisions
should be avoided when the ATC handles course requests.
* The ATC needs to deal with exceptions: weather, unexpected obstacles, and
flights which can't fly though their courses on time, etc.

Do I miss anything?

=====
me = d2004xx = d2003xx = d2002xx


	
	
		
___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!  http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com