mpls-linux-general — Mailing list for general discussion about MPLS for Linux

Re: [mpls-linux-general] cannot run 'spec_nh' specific ip commands

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 04:44:52PM +0300, Itrat Rasod Quadri wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I installed the iproute rpm packages but am unable to run the 'spec_nh' 
> specific ip command. Also can you kindly setup an ftp server from where I can 
> download all the source files specially for the latest kernel, iproute and 
> iptables one as I cannot use p4 due to port blockage in my university. 

What error are you getting?  What command are you using?  Have you tried
to grabbing the src rpms?

> Thanks in advance.
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
> Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
> 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

-- 
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

Re: [mpls-linux-general] rsvp-te quagga ospf

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

The commands you are seeing with respect to rsvp-te are just place
holders, there is not any RSVP-TE code behind it.

On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 09:56:16AM +0300, Peter Shtinkov wrote:
> Hello,
> 	I tried mpls-1.1 patched kernel version 2.6.5 and quagga-ldp with ospf
> and rsvp from Leu repository. Currently i have working ospf but not
> rsvp. Juniper says that rsvp neighbour is down. I can't debug
> configuration because mplsd daemon dies when i try to "trace all" in
> it's config. Has anyone some working configuration covering
> rsvp/ospf/mpls
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
> Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
> 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

-- 
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Problems compiling quagga

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

The version of ldp-portable you are using is very old.  You will want to
wait until I release a new version.

On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 05:51:15PM +0000, Pablo de la Serna wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>         I've just patched kernel-2.4.25 with mpls-1.172, and now I'm trying 
> to compile quagga to support ldp, but I'm having some problems.  I've 
> donwladed a pair of directories from James's development tree:
>        * ldp-portable
>        * quagga-ldp
> 
> Do I need any other directory ?
> 
> I'm trying to compile quagga-ldp after execute 'create-links', but I get 
> some errors, there are some variables which aren't defined, do you know 
> what am I doing wrong??
> 
> I've seen the web page of the mailing list is out of date, is there any 
> problem with it ?
> 
> I need some help to compile quagga, please!!
> 
>         Thanks for your time,   Pablo
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Reserva desde ahora tus vacaciones en MSN Viajes. M?s c?modo, m?s barato y 
> m?s opciones. http://www.msn.es/Viajes/
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
> Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to 
> deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
> http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

-- 
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

Re: [mpls-linux-general] problem about add outsegment

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

The only version of ldp-portable is very old you will want to wait until
the next release until working with it.

On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 09:42:54AM +0000, ?? ?? wrote:
> Dear all
>    Now I have patched mpls-linux-1.172.tar to linux and compiled.Then I 
> patch ldp-portable-0.310 to zebra-0.94.
>    I configure the mplsd between A and B .A has two interface ??
> 202.112.146.244??and ??192.168.100.67??.B has one interface ??
> 202.112.146.177?? .
>    First I startup zebra and configure the router-id .Router-id is 
> 202.112.146.244 for A and 202.112.146.177 for B.
>    Then I startup mplsd and configure the peer . I input ??peer 
> 202.112.146.177??for A and ??peer 202.112.146.244?? for B.
>    Then I startup ripd  and startup their interface.
> 
> Then the mplsd will be shut up.
> When I debug mplsd with gdb,it will show:
> Mpls_mpls_outsegement_add() at impl_mpls.c:98
> Mir.mir_instruction[1].mir_date.set.mni_if=o->nexthop.if_handle->ifindex
> Cannot access memory at address 0x18
> Why it ? 
> Please help me!Thank you very much!
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> ???????? MSN Explorer:   http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/  
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
> Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to 
> deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
> http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

-- 
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Fwd: Problems compiling quagga-ldp with 2,4,20 kernel (II)

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

You have two options:
-fix it yourself
-wait until I fix it

I just got back from an interoperability session.  It will take me sometime
to get back into working on my pet projects.

On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 08:24:07PM +0200, Arturo P. Gonz?lez Herranz wrote:
> Hi all again,
>        I don't know if someone has already answered my two last
> messages, but I haven't received any. I have looked at
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=5051, but it's
> still out of date!!. Perhaps I have some problem with my mail (although
> I think it works right) because just now I have received a James's mail
> with subject:
> Re: [mpls-linux-general] I want to get the newer ldp-portable, but I
> haven't received the message with subject:
> [mpls-linux-general] I want to get the newer ldp-portable, so something
> is going wrong,.... (maybe the  
> 
> mpl...@li...
> ??)
> 
> Anyway, I'm still having the same problems compiling quagga-ldp with
> 2.4.20 and 2.6.1 kernels, so I need some help. If someone has already
> answered me, please resend me your answer.
> 
>      Thanks in advance,
>                     Art.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Arturo P. Gonz?lez Herranz <apg...@it...>

Content-Description: Reenviado mensaje - Problems compiling quagga-ldp with 2,4,20 kernel (II)
> Subject: Problems compiling quagga-ldp with 2,4,20 kernel (II)
> From: "Arturo P." Gonz?lez Herranz <apg...@it...>
> To: mpl...@li...
> In-Reply-To: <108...@cr...>
> X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
> Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 19:57:07 +0200
> 
> Hi,
>   I don't really know how I should compile quagga-ldp (Is this the
> directory I have to compile?) that I've downloaded from James's
> development tree. I'm trying to do the next:
> 
> 1. modify quagga-ldp/mplsd/create-links to point to ldp-portable 	source
> distribution (taken from James`s tree)
> 2. execute create-links
> 3. go back to the top of the quagga-ldp source tree
> 4. aclocal
> 5. automake
> 6. autoconf
> 7. configure and compile quagga-ldp (disabling ipv6)
> 
> Am I doing something wrong?
> 
> I'm trying to compile it, but I always get errors, I have seen that the
> library mplsd.h has changed from kernel 2.4.x to kernel 2.6.x, but if  I
> update this library,I also get an error:
> .
> .
> .
> gcc  -g -O2 -Wall   -o mplsd  impl_fib.o impl_ifmgr.o impl_lock.o
> impl_mm.o impl_mpls.o impl_policy.o impl_socket.o impl_timer.o
> impl_tree.o mpls.o mpls_interface.o mpls_zebra.o mpls_main.o mpls_vty.o
> static.o static_vty.o ldp.o ldp_interface.o ldp_vty.o ldp_remote_peer.o
> l2cc_interface.o ldp_addr.o ldp_adj.o ldp_attr.o ldp_buf.o ldp_cfg.o
> ldp_entity.o ldp_fec.o ldp_global.o ldp_hello.o ldp_hop.o ldp_hop_list.o
> ldp_if.o ldp_inet_addr.o ldp_init.o ldp_inlabel.o ldp_keepalive.o
> ldp_label_abort.o ldp_label_mapping.o ldp_label_rel_with.o
> ldp_label_request.o ldp_mesg.o ldp_nortel.o ldp_notif.o ldp_outlabel.o
> ldp_pdu_setup.o ldp_peer.o ldp_resource.o ldp_session.o
> ldp_state_funcs.o ldp_state_machine.o ldp_tunnel.o ldp_nexthop.o
> mpls_compare.o lsr_cfg.o lsr_global.o lsr_if.o lsr_insegment.o
> lsr_labelmanager.o lsr_outsegment.o lsr_xconnect.o lsr_ftn.o rsvpte.o
> rsvpte_vty.o rsvpte_interface.o rsvpte_global.o rsvpte_if.o rsvpte_cfg.o
> ../lib/libzebra.a -lm -lcrypt
> ldp_vty.o(.text+0xce7): En la funci?n `mpls_show_ldp_attr':
> /tmp/mpls/quagga-ldp/mplsd/ldp_vty.c:716: undefined reference to
> `ldp_cfg_global_attr'
> collect2: ld devolvi? el estado de salida 1
> make[2]: *** [mplsd] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/mpls/quagga-ldp/mplsd'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/mpls/quagga-ldp'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> 
> Where is 'ldp_cfg_global_attr' defined? I've been looking for it but I
> haven't found it.
> 
> I have also tryed to compile it with kernel 2.6.1 patched with
> mpls-1.922,  (although I have to work with kernel-2.4.20 with
> mpls-1.172), but I also get an error:
> .
> .
> .
> ldp_session.c: In function `ldp_session_for_nexthop':
> ldp_session.c:739: parse error before `*'
> ldp_session.c:740: `s' undeclared (first use in this function)
> ldp_session.c:740: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> ldp_session.c:740: for each function it appears in.)
> make[2]: *** [ldp_session.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Saliendo directorio `/tmp/mpls/quagga-ldp/mplsd'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Saliendo directorio `/tmp/mpls/quagga-ldp'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> 
> So, I don't know what to do.
> 
> Can anyone help me, please?
> 
> 	Thanks for your time.
> 
> 
> El mi?rcoles, 05-05-2004 a las 21:02, Arturo P. Gonz?lez Herranz
> escribi?:
> > Hi all,
> >    I've downloaded the directories quagga-ldp and ldp-portable from
> > James's development tree, but I'm having some problems compiling it
> > (I've seen that somes stucts have changed,...). I have a kernel 2.4.20
> > patched with mpls-linux-1.172 and I'm wondering if it's possible to
> > compile it with this kernel or I should migrate to a 2.6.x. I actually
> > need to work with 2.4.20 kernel, so I hope this new release of
> > ldp-portable works with my kernel or I'm gonna be in great problems.
> > 
> >        Kindly,
> >              Art
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Arturo P. Gonz?lez Herranz <apg...@it...>
> 
> -- 
> Arturo P. Gonz?lez Herranz <apg...@it...>


-- 
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

[mpls-linux-general] cannot run 'spec_nh' specific ip commands

[Itrat R. Q. <iq...@cc...>]

Hello,

I installed the iproute rpm packages but am unable to run the 'spec_nh' 
specific ip command. Also can you kindly setup an ftp server from where I can 
download all the source files specially for the latest kernel, iproute and 
iptables one as I cannot use p4 due to port blockage in my university. 

Thanks in advance.

[mpls-linux-general] rsvp-te quagga ospf

[Peter S. <sht...@sp...>]

Hello,
	I tried mpls-1.1 patched kernel version 2.6.5 and quagga-ldp with ospf
and rsvp from Leu repository. Currently i have working ospf but not
rsvp. Juniper says that rsvp neighbour is down. I can't debug
configuration because mplsd daemon dies when i try to "trace all" in
it's config. Has anyone some working configuration covering
rsvp/ospf/mpls
 

[mpls-linux-general] Problems compiling quagga

[Pablo de la S. <mp...@ho...>]

Hello everybody,
         I've just patched kernel-2.4.25 with mpls-1.172, and now I'm trying 
to compile quagga to support ldp, but I'm having some problems.  I've 
donwladed a pair of directories from James's development tree:
        * ldp-portable
        * quagga-ldp

Do I need any other directory ?

I'm trying to compile quagga-ldp after execute 'create-links', but I get 
some errors, there are some variables which aren't defined, do you know what 
am I doing wrong??

I've seen the web page of the mailing list is out of date, is there any 
problem with it ?

I need some help to compile quagga, please!!

         Thanks for your time,   Pablo

_________________________________________________________________
Reserva desde ahora tus vacaciones en MSN Viajes. Más cómodo, más barato y 
más opciones. http://www.msn.es/Viajes/

[mpls-linux-general] problem about add outsegment

[<che...@ho...>]

Dear all
    Now I have patched mpls-linux-1.172.tar to linux and compiled.Then I 
patch ldp-portable-0.310 to zebra-0.94.
    I configure the mplsd between A and B .A has two interface ‘
202.112.146.244’and ‘192.168.100.67’.B has one interface ‘
202.112.146.177’ .
    First I startup zebra and configure the router-id .Router-id is 
202.112.146.244 for A and 202.112.146.177 for B.
    Then I startup mplsd and configure the peer . I input ‘peer 
202.112.146.177’for A and ‘peer 202.112.146.244’ for B.
    Then I startup ripd  and startup their interface.

Then the mplsd will be shut up.
When I debug mplsd with gdb,it will show:
Mpls_mpls_outsegement_add() at impl_mpls.c:98
Mir.mir_instruction[1].mir_date.set.mni_if=o->nexthop.if_handle->ifindex
Cannot access memory at address 0x18
Why it ? 
Please help me!Thank you very much!

_________________________________________________________________
免费下载 MSN Explorer:   http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/  

Re: [mpls-linux-general] iproute2 and iptables installation with kernel 2.6

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 10:24:06PM +0300, Itrat Rasod Quadri wrote:
> Hello,
>  
> I have upgraded the kernel to 2.6. I have installed the src rpm for
> iptables-1.2.9 but when i try to install iptables-1.2.9*.i386.rpm I get a
> failed dependency error like "kernel >= 2.4.20 is needed by
> iptables-1.2.9*spec_nh1". Also once the rpm packages are installed can I
> directly start using iproute and iptables commands associated with mpls as
> I previously used binaries to compile them. Also can you kindly tell me
> the exact versions of iptables and iproute2 to use in case I want to patch
> them and compile them manually.

I'm not sure why the RPMs are failing for you.  I use them on my fedora
install.

All of the details (in fact the whole source for these pacakges) are in my
development tree.  You will want:

//depot/iproute2-mpls/...
//depot/iptables-mpls/...


> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
> Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to 
> deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
> http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

-- 
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

[mpls-linux-general] Fwd: Problems compiling quagga-ldp with 2,4,20 kernel (II)

[Arturo P. H. <apg...@it...>]

Hi all again,
       I don't know if someone has already answered my two last
messages, but I haven't received any. I have looked at
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=3D5051, but it's
still out of date!!. Perhaps I have some problem with my mail (although
I think it works right) because just now I have received a James's mail
with subject:
Re: [mpls-linux-general] I want to get the newer ldp-portable, but I
haven't received the message with subject:
[mpls-linux-general] I want to get the newer ldp-portable, so something
is going wrong,.... (maybe the =20

mpl...@li...
??)

Anyway, I'm still having the same problems compiling quagga-ldp with
2.4.20 and 2.6.1 kernels, so I need some help. If someone has already
answered me, please resend me your answer.

     Thanks in advance,
                    Art.



--=20
Arturo P. Gonz=E1lez Herranz <apg...@it...>

Re: [mpls-linux-general] I want to get the newer ldp-portable

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 12:06:29PM +0000, ?? ?? wrote:
> Dear all
>  I have patched mpls-linux-1.172.tar to linux and compiled. Then I patch 
> ldp-portable-0.310 to zebra-0.94 . It have some bug.
>  So I want to get the newer ldp-portable . James ever give us address ??
> http://mpls-linux.sf.net?? .But I can??t access to it . I only access to ??
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mpls-linux?? . Do you have other method to 
> get the newer ldp-portable.
>   Please help me ! Thank you very much!

The instructions for accesing my personal development tree are on
http://mpls-linux.sourceforge.net/ (aka http://mpls-linux.sf.net/)
I can't help you if you can't access the web site.

> _________________________________________________________________
> ???????? MSN Explorer:   http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/  
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
> Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to 
> deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
> http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

-- 
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

[mpls-linux-general] iproute2 and iptables installation with kernel 2.6

[Itrat R. Q. <iq...@cc...>]

Hello,
 
I have upgraded the kernel to 2.6. I have installed the src rpm for
iptables-1.2.9 but when i try to install iptables-1.2.9*.i386.rpm I get a
failed dependency error like "kernel >= 2.4.20 is needed by
iptables-1.2.9*spec_nh1". Also once the rpm packages are installed can I
directly start using iproute and iptables commands associated with mpls as
I previously used binaries to compile them. Also can you kindly tell me
the exact versions of iptables and iproute2 to use in case I want to patch
them and compile them manually.

[mpls-linux-general] I want to get the newer ldp-portable

[<che...@ho...>]

Dear all
  I have patched mpls-linux-1.172.tar to linux and compiled. Then I patch 
ldp-portable-0.310 to zebra-0.94 . It have some bug.
  So I want to get the newer ldp-portable . James ever give us address ‘
http://mpls-linux.sf.net’ .But I can’t access to it . I only access to ‘
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mpls-linux’ . Do you have other method to 
get the newer ldp-portable.
   Please help me ! Thank you very much!

_________________________________________________________________
免费下载 MSN Explorer:   http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/  

[mpls-linux-general] Problems compiling quagga-ldp with 2,4,20 kernel (II)

[Arturo P. H. <apg...@it...>]

Hi,
  I don't really know how I should compile quagga-ldp (Is this the
directory I have to compile?) that I've downloaded from James's
development tree. I'm trying to do the next:

1. modify quagga-ldp/mplsd/create-links to point to ldp-portable 	source
distribution (taken from James`s tree)
2. execute create-links
3. go back to the top of the quagga-ldp source tree
4. aclocal
5. automake
6. autoconf
7. configure and compile quagga-ldp (disabling ipv6)

Am I doing something wrong?

I'm trying to compile it, but I always get errors, I have seen that the
library mplsd.h has changed from kernel 2.4.x to kernel 2.6.x, but if  I
update this library,I also get an error:
.
.
.
gcc  -g -O2 -Wall   -o mplsd  impl_fib.o impl_ifmgr.o impl_lock.o
impl_mm.o impl_mpls.o impl_policy.o impl_socket.o impl_timer.o
impl_tree.o mpls.o mpls_interface.o mpls_zebra.o mpls_main.o mpls_vty.o
static.o static_vty.o ldp.o ldp_interface.o ldp_vty.o ldp_remote_peer.o
l2cc_interface.o ldp_addr.o ldp_adj.o ldp_attr.o ldp_buf.o ldp_cfg.o
ldp_entity.o ldp_fec.o ldp_global.o ldp_hello.o ldp_hop.o ldp_hop_list.o
ldp_if.o ldp_inet_addr.o ldp_init.o ldp_inlabel.o ldp_keepalive.o
ldp_label_abort.o ldp_label_mapping.o ldp_label_rel_with.o
ldp_label_request.o ldp_mesg.o ldp_nortel.o ldp_notif.o ldp_outlabel.o
ldp_pdu_setup.o ldp_peer.o ldp_resource.o ldp_session.o
ldp_state_funcs.o ldp_state_machine.o ldp_tunnel.o ldp_nexthop.o
mpls_compare.o lsr_cfg.o lsr_global.o lsr_if.o lsr_insegment.o
lsr_labelmanager.o lsr_outsegment.o lsr_xconnect.o lsr_ftn.o rsvpte.o
rsvpte_vty.o rsvpte_interface.o rsvpte_global.o rsvpte_if.o rsvpte_cfg.o
../lib/libzebra.a -lm -lcrypt
ldp_vty.o(.text+0xce7): En la funci=F3n `mpls_show_ldp_attr':
/tmp/mpls/quagga-ldp/mplsd/ldp_vty.c:716: undefined reference to
`ldp_cfg_global_attr'
collect2: ld devolvi=F3 el estado de salida 1
make[2]: *** [mplsd] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/mpls/quagga-ldp/mplsd'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/mpls/quagga-ldp'
make: *** [all] Error 2

Where is 'ldp_cfg_global_attr' defined? I've been looking for it but I
haven't found it.

I have also tryed to compile it with kernel 2.6.1 patched with
mpls-1.922,  (although I have to work with kernel-2.4.20 with
mpls-1.172), but I also get an error:
.
.
.
ldp_session.c: In function `ldp_session_for_nexthop':
ldp_session.c:739: parse error before `*'
ldp_session.c:740: `s' undeclared (first use in this function)
ldp_session.c:740: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
ldp_session.c:740: for each function it appears in.)
make[2]: *** [ldp_session.o] Error 1
make[2]: Saliendo directorio `/tmp/mpls/quagga-ldp/mplsd'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Saliendo directorio `/tmp/mpls/quagga-ldp'
make: *** [all] Error 2

So, I don't know what to do.

Can anyone help me, please?

	Thanks for your time.


El mi=E9rcoles, 05-05-2004 a las 21:02, Arturo P. Gonz=E1lez Herranz
escribi=F3:
> Hi all,
>    I've downloaded the directories quagga-ldp and ldp-portable from
> James's development tree, but I'm having some problems compiling it
> (I've seen that somes stucts have changed,...). I have a kernel 2.4.20
> patched with mpls-linux-1.172 and I'm wondering if it's possible to
> compile it with this kernel or I should migrate to a 2.6.x. I actually
> need to work with 2.4.20 kernel, so I hope this new release of
> ldp-portable works with my kernel or I'm gonna be in great problems.
>=20
>        Kindly,
>              Art
>=20
>=20
> --
> Arturo P. Gonz=E1lez Herranz <apg...@it...>

--=20
Arturo P. Gonz=E1lez Herranz <apg...@it...>

[mpls-linux-general] Problems compiling quagga-ldp with 2,4,20 kernel

[Arturo P. H. <apg...@it...>]

Hi all,
   I've downloaded the directories quagga-ldp and ldp-portable from
James's development tree, but I'm having some problems compiling it
(I've seen that somes stucts have changed,...). I have a kernel 2.4.20
patched with mpls-linux-1.172 and I'm wondering if it's possible to
compile it with this kernel or I should migrate to a 2.6.x. I actually
need to work with 2.4.20 kernel, so I hope this new release of
ldp-portable works with my kernel or I'm gonna be in great problems.

       Kindly,
             Art


--
Arturo P. Gonz=E1lez Herranz <apg...@it...>

[mpls-linux-general] upgraded versions of iptables and iproute2

[Itrat R. Q. <iq...@cc...>]

Hello,
 
I am using upgraded versions of iptables and iproute2 and I have all
netfilter options enabled in the kernel as well. Also, if I upgrade to
kernel 2.6 at the ingress and the egress will I have to do the same at the
LSRs.
 
Thanks in advance.

Re: [mpls-linux-general] mapping incoming and outgoing traffic

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

Did you install/compile a MPLS enabled version of iptables or iproute2?
I no longer do development on the 2.4 kernel.  If you want the latest
MPLS code I suggest moving to a 2.6 kernel.

On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 05:37:43PM +0300, Itrat Rasod Quadri wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am trying to map incoming ip traffic on to an lsp at the ingress and
> vice versa at the egress, for that I used the following iptable command
> 
> iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -o eth0 -d 172.16.134.36 -j MPLS --set-key 
> 0x2
> 
> at the ingress but I got the following response
> 
> Unknown arg `--set-key'
> 
> I am using iptables v1.2.5 and kernel 2.4.19
> 
> Looking forward to your feedback.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
> Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
> Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. 
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

-- 
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

[mpls-linux-general] mapping incoming and outgoing traffic

[Itrat R. Q. <iq...@cc...>]

Hello,

I am trying to map incoming ip traffic on to an lsp at the ingress and
vice versa at the egress, for that I used the following iptable command

iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -o eth0 -d 172.16.134.36 -j MPLS --set-key 
0x2

at the ingress but I got the following response

Unknown arg `--set-key'

I am using iptables v1.2.5 and kernel 2.4.19

Looking forward to your feedback.

[mpls-linux-general] mapping incoming and outgoing traffic

[itrat q. <iqu...@ho...>]

<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV class=RTE>Hello,<BR><BR>I am trying to map incoming ip traffic on to an lsp at the ingress and<BR>vice versa at the egress, for that I used the following iptable command<BR><BR>iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -o eth0 -d 172.16.134.36 -j MPLS --set-key 0x2<BR><BR>at the ingress but I got the following response<BR><BR>Unknown arg `--set-key'<BR><BR>I am using iptables v1.2.5 and kernel 2.4.19<BR><BR>Looking forward to your feedback.</DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>MSN 8 helps <a href="http://g.msn.com/8HMAEN/2743??PS=">ELIMINATE E-MAIL VIRUSES. </a> Get 2 months FREE*.</html>

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Problem with mplsd

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

ldp-portable-0.310 is really old.  I have fixed a lot of bugs but I
have not made an official release.  If you would like to work with the
new code, you can look at my development tree. (http://mpls-linux.sf.net for
more info)

On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 10:39:50PM +0200, Arturo P. Gonz?lez Herranz wrote:
> Hi all,
>     I'm trying to do that a linux machine (kernel 2.4.20, successfully
> patched with mpls-linux-1.172 and ldp-portable-0.310 for zebra 0.94)
> stablishes two ldp connections through two gre tunnels, with two cisco
> routers, but I can't do it.
> 
> My configuration files are:
> 
> zebra.conf
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> !
> hostname zebra
> password xxxx
> !
> !
> interface lo
> ip address 5.0.0.1/32
> !
> !
> interface Tunnel0
> multicast
> !
> interface Tunnel1
> multicast
> !
> interface eth0
> ip address 10.0.201.1/24 secondary
> !
> interface eth1
> !
> !
> log stdout
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ospfd.conf
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> hostname ospfd
> password xxx
> !
> interface Tunnel0
> !
> interface Tunnel1
> !
> interface lo
> !
> interface eth0
> !
> interface eth1
> !
> router ospf
>   redistribute connected route-map subred
>   passive-interface lo
>   network 12.0.1.1/32 area 3 --peer Tunnel1, with router-id 12.12.12.12
>   network 13.0.1.1/32 area 3 --peer Tunnel0, with router-id 13.13.13.13
>   network 5.0.0.1/32 area 3
> !
> ip prefix-list uno seq 5 permit 10.0.201.0/24
> !
> route-map subred permit 1
> match ip address prefix-list uno
> !
> log stdout
> --------------------------------------------------
> 
> mplsd.conf
> --------------------------------------------------
> hostname mplsd
> password xxx
> ! 
> mpls ldp
> !
> !
> interface lo
> !
> interface Tunnel0
> mpls ldp
> !
> interface Tunnel1
>   mpls ldp
> !
> interface eth0
> !
> interface eth1
> !
> log stdout
> -----------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> When I look what ldp neighbors has my machine, I get:
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> mplsd# sh ldp neighbor
> Peer LDP Ident: 13.13.13.13:0; Local LDP Ident: 5.0.0.1:0
>         TCP connection: 0.0.0.0.646 - 13.13.13.13.11320
>         State: OPERATIONAL; Msgs sent/recv: 75/231; UNSOLICITED
>         Up time: 00:31:00
>         LDP discovery sources:
>           Tunnel1
>         Addresses bound to peer:
>           163.117.144.8   
> 
>         (Here there are seven missing addresses!!!! although the router 
> sends them)
> 
> Peer LDP Ident: 12.12.12.12:0; Local LDP Ident: 5.0.0.1:0
>         TCP connection: 0.0.0.0.646 - 12.12.12.12.11849
>         State: OPERATIONAL; Msgs sent/recv: 71/197; UNSOLICITED
>         Up time: 00:32:03
>         LDP discovery sources:
>           Tunnel0
>         Addresses bound to peer:
>           163.117.144.70        12.0.0.1        12.12.12.12           
> 10.192.0.1            12.0.1.1
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> The TCP connetion with 12.12.12.12 works fine, and it does the label
> mapping perfectly, but the connection with 13.13.13.13 doesn't work (it
> doesn't do any label mapping, but only in one sense), I mean the router
> 13.13.13.13 has the label mapping of the linux box, but the linux
> machine doesn't have any label from the router 13.13.13.13.
> 
> When I look what ldp neighbors has my ciso routers, I get:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 12.12.12.12#sh mpls ldp neighbor
>     Peer LDP Ident: 14.14.14.14:0; Local LDP Ident 12.12.12.12:0
>         TCP connection: 14.14.14.14.11049 - 12.12.12.12.646
>         State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 3595/3598; Downstream
>         Up time: 2d02h
>         LDP discovery sources:
>           FastEthernet0/1, Src IP addr: 10.192.0.2
>         Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
>           14.14.14.14     10.128.0.2      10.192.0.2
>     Peer LDP Ident: 5.0.0.1:0; Local LDP Ident 12.12.12.12:0
>         TCP connection: 5.0.0.1.646 - 12.12.12.12.11849
>         State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 168/145; Downstream
>         Up time: 00:32:03
>         LDP discovery sources:
>           Tunnel0, Src IP addr: 12.0.1.2
>         Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
>           5.0.0.1         12.0.1.2        13.0.1.2           
> 163.117.140.192
>           10.0.201.1      163.117.144.192
>     Peer LDP Ident: 10.1.0.1:0; Local LDP Ident 12.12.12.12:0
>         TCP connection: 10.1.0.1.646 - 12.12.12.12.11851
>         State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 55/45; Downstream
>         Up time: 00:08:01
>         LDP discovery sources:
>           FastEthernet0/1, Src IP addr: 10.192.0.200
>         Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
>           15.15.15.15     163.117.140.100 10.192.0.200    10.1.0.1
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> 13.13.13.13#sh mpls ldp neighbor
> Peer LDP Ident: 5.0.0.1:0; Local LDP Ident 13.13.13.13:0
>         TCP connection: 5.0.0.1.646 - 13.13.13.13.11320
>         State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 213/150; Downstream
>         Up time: 00:31:00
>         LDP discovery sources:
>           Tunnel1000, Src IP addr: 13.0.1.2
>         Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
>           5.0.0.1         12.0.1.2        13.0.1.2               
> 163.117.140.192 10.0.201.1      163.117.144.192
> Peer LDP Ident: 10.1.0.1:0; Local LDP Ident 13.13.13.13:0
>         TCP connection: 10.1.0.1.646 - 13.13.13.13.11322
>         State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 81/49; Downstream
>         Up time: 00:08:17
>         LDP discovery sources:
>           Ethernet0/0/2, Src IP addr: 10.1.0.1
>         Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
>           15.15.15.15     163.117.140.100 10.192.0.200    10.1.0.1
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I have tried a lot things, but it doesn't work.
> I have changed the router-id of my linux machine to 16.0.0.1 and my
> linux tries to start the TCP connections, but it uses a wrong IP source
> address (12.0.1.2 in Tunnnel0 and 13.0.1.2 in Tunnel1, instead of
> 16.0.0.1, why?)
> 
> The mpls daemon sometimes stops it when I start it and always does it
> when I type:
> 
> mplsd# sh ldp discovery Connection closed by foreign host.
> 
> It's really annoying!!
> 
> 
> Has anyone some idea about what I'm doing wrong??
> 
> Thanks for your time,
>                Kind regards,
>                           Art
> 
>          
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Arturo P. Gonz?lez Herranz <apg...@it...>
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
> Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
> Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. 
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id?66&op?k
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

-- 
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

[mpls-linux-general] Problem with mplsd

[Arturo P. H. <apg...@it...>]

Hi all,
    I'm trying to do that a linux machine (kernel 2.4.20, successfully
patched with mpls-linux-1.172 and ldp-portable-0.310 for zebra 0.94)
stablishes two ldp connections through two gre tunnels, with two cisco
routers, but I can't do it.

My configuration files are:

zebra.conf
-----------------------------------------------------------
!
hostname zebra
password xxxx
!
!
interface lo
ip address 5.0.0.1/32
!
!
interface Tunnel0
multicast
!
interface Tunnel1
multicast
!
interface eth0
ip address 10.0.201.1/24 secondary
!
interface eth1
!
!
log stdout
-----------------------------------------------------------

ospfd.conf
-----------------------------------------------------------
hostname ospfd
password xxx
!
interface Tunnel0
!
interface Tunnel1
!
interface lo
!
interface eth0
!
interface eth1
!
router ospf
  redistribute connected route-map subred
  passive-interface lo
  network 12.0.1.1/32 area 3 --peer Tunnel1, with router-id 12.12.12.12
  network 13.0.1.1/32 area 3 --peer Tunnel0, with router-id 13.13.13.13
  network 5.0.0.1/32 area 3
!
ip prefix-list uno seq 5 permit 10.0.201.0/24
!
route-map subred permit 1
match ip address prefix-list uno
!
log stdout
--------------------------------------------------

mplsd.conf
--------------------------------------------------
hostname mplsd
password xxx
!=20
mpls ldp
!
!
interface lo
!
interface Tunnel0
mpls ldp
!
interface Tunnel1
  mpls ldp
!
interface eth0
!
interface eth1
!
log stdout
-----------------------------------------------------


When I look what ldp neighbors has my machine, I get:
-----------------------------------------------------------
mplsd# sh ldp neighbor
Peer LDP Ident: 13.13.13.13:0; Local LDP Ident: 5.0.0.1:0
        TCP connection: 0.0.0.0.646 - 13.13.13.13.11320
        State: OPERATIONAL; Msgs sent/recv: 75/231; UNSOLICITED
        Up time: 00:31:00
        LDP discovery sources:
          Tunnel1
        Addresses bound to peer:
          163.117.144.8  =20

        (Here there are seven missing addresses!!!! although the router=20
sends them)

Peer LDP Ident: 12.12.12.12:0; Local LDP Ident: 5.0.0.1:0
        TCP connection: 0.0.0.0.646 - 12.12.12.12.11849
        State: OPERATIONAL; Msgs sent/recv: 71/197; UNSOLICITED
        Up time: 00:32:03
        LDP discovery sources:
          Tunnel0
        Addresses bound to peer:
          163.117.144.70        12.0.0.1        12.12.12.12          =20
10.192.0.1            12.0.1.1
---------------------------------------------------------------

The TCP connetion with 12.12.12.12 works fine, and it does the label
mapping perfectly, but the connection with 13.13.13.13 doesn't work (it
doesn't do any label mapping, but only in one sense), I mean the router
13.13.13.13 has the label mapping of the linux box, but the linux
machine doesn't have any label from the router 13.13.13.13.

When I look what ldp neighbors has my ciso routers, I get:
---------------------------------------------------------------
12.12.12.12#sh mpls ldp neighbor
    Peer LDP Ident: 14.14.14.14:0; Local LDP Ident 12.12.12.12:0
        TCP connection: 14.14.14.14.11049 - 12.12.12.12.646
        State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 3595/3598; Downstream
        Up time: 2d02h
        LDP discovery sources:
          FastEthernet0/1, Src IP addr: 10.192.0.2
        Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
          14.14.14.14     10.128.0.2      10.192.0.2
    Peer LDP Ident: 5.0.0.1:0; Local LDP Ident 12.12.12.12:0
        TCP connection: 5.0.0.1.646 - 12.12.12.12.11849
        State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 168/145; Downstream
        Up time: 00:32:03
        LDP discovery sources:
          Tunnel0, Src IP addr: 12.0.1.2
        Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
          5.0.0.1         12.0.1.2        13.0.1.2          =20
163.117.140.192
          10.0.201.1      163.117.144.192
    Peer LDP Ident: 10.1.0.1:0; Local LDP Ident 12.12.12.12:0
        TCP connection: 10.1.0.1.646 - 12.12.12.12.11851
        State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 55/45; Downstream
        Up time: 00:08:01
        LDP discovery sources:
          FastEthernet0/1, Src IP addr: 10.192.0.200
        Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
          15.15.15.15     163.117.140.100 10.192.0.200    10.1.0.1

--------------------------------------------------------------
13.13.13.13#sh mpls ldp neighbor
Peer LDP Ident: 5.0.0.1:0; Local LDP Ident 13.13.13.13:0
        TCP connection: 5.0.0.1.646 - 13.13.13.13.11320
        State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 213/150; Downstream
        Up time: 00:31:00
        LDP discovery sources:
          Tunnel1000, Src IP addr: 13.0.1.2
        Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
          5.0.0.1         12.0.1.2        13.0.1.2              =20
163.117.140.192 10.0.201.1      163.117.144.192
Peer LDP Ident: 10.1.0.1:0; Local LDP Ident 13.13.13.13:0
        TCP connection: 10.1.0.1.646 - 13.13.13.13.11322
        State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 81/49; Downstream
        Up time: 00:08:17
        LDP discovery sources:
          Ethernet0/0/2, Src IP addr: 10.1.0.1
        Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
          15.15.15.15     163.117.140.100 10.192.0.200    10.1.0.1
------------------------------------------------------------------

I have tried a lot things, but it doesn't work.
I have changed the router-id of my linux machine to 16.0.0.1 and my
linux tries to start the TCP connections, but it uses a wrong IP source
address (12.0.1.2 in Tunnnel0 and 13.0.1.2 in Tunnel1, instead of
16.0.0.1, why?)

The mpls daemon sometimes stops it when I start it and always does it
when I type:

mplsd# sh ldp discovery Connection closed by foreign host.

It's really annoying!!


Has anyone some idea about what I'm doing wrong??

Thanks for your time,
               Kind regards,
                          Art

        =20




--=20
Arturo P. Gonz=E1lez Herranz <apg...@it...>

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Occasional kernel panic

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 02:31:40PM +1000, Jon...@cs... wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> This Linux mpls implementation is great and I have had seven PCs running
> for a couple months without any big drama.
> 
> However, I have encountered 4 occasions of kernel panic in one machine
> and one more kernel panic in another machine during this time (please
> see trace below for the latest event).
> 
> Would anyone happen to know what could have caused it? I am still using
> mpls-Linux version 1.172 (@242) on a Mandrake 9.1 platform (kernel
> 2.4.21, P4 1.7GHz, 256M RAM).

We have stopped development on 2.4 and have moved to 2.6.  In the 2.6
development we have fix many issues with the output path (which is where
this panic occurs).  I would suggest migrating to the 2.6 version.

> Thanks for your information...
> 
> Best Regards,
> Jonathan
> 
> 
> 
> Call Trace:
> [<c0264f76>] mpls_output2+0xa6/0x1a0 [kernel]
> [<c02650e6>] mpls_output_shim+0x76/0x140 [kernel]
> [<c0265233>] mpls_output+0x83/0xc0 [kernel]
> [<c022ee14>] ip_forward+0x1c4/0x2b0 [kernel]
> [<c022e049>] ip_rcv_finish+0x1f9/0x260 [kernel]
> [<c0219608>] netif_rx+0x78/0x180 [kernel]
> [<c021999e>] netif_receive_skb+0x11e/0x1e0 [kernel]
> [<c0219acf>] process_backlog+0x6f/0x110 [kernel]
> [<c0219bda>] net_rx_action+0x6a/0x100 [kernel]
> [<c01228d6>] do_softirq+0xa6/0xb0 [kernel]
> [<c010aae0>] do_IRQ+0xb0/0xc0 [kernel]
> [<C010d158>] call_do_IRQ+0x5/0xd [kernel]
> [<e280a8a0>] E journal_blocks_per_page_R8187c971+0x3d0/0xffffabf0 [jbd]
> [<e2803ec3>] E journal_get_write_acessRc22dd827+0x53/0x70 [jbd]
> [<e2815ece>] E journal_blocks_per_page_R8187c971+0xbafe/0xffffabf0 [jbd]
> [<e280322d>] E ___strtok_R29805c13+0x223f67c5/0xffd377d8
> [<e280334d>] E ___strtok_R29805c13+0x223f68e5/0xffd377d8
> [<e2815f68>] E journal_blocks_per_page_R8187c971+0xbb98/oxffffabf0 [jbd]
> [<e2816071>] E journal_blocks_per_page_R8187c971+0xbca1/oxffffabf0 [jbd]
> [<c01582b3>] __mark_inode_dirty+0x93/0xa0 [kernel]
> [<c01593ea>] update_atime+0x6a/0x70 [kernel]
> [<c01360ea>] generic_file_reaed+0x9a/0x150 [kernel]
> [<c0135fd0>] file_read_actor+0x0/0x80 [kernel]
> [<c0144342>] get_empty_filp+0x52/0x130 [kernel]
> [<c014bc46>] kernel_read+0x66/0x70 [kernel]
> [<c014c0ce>] prepare_binprm+0x12e/0x150 [kernel]
> [<c014c549>] do_execve+0xb9/0x1d0 [kernel]
> [<c0107c2d>] sys_execve+0x4d/0x80 [kernel]
> [<c010938f>] system_call+0x33/0x38 [kernel]
> 
> Code: ff 40 04 8b 13 8b 41 04 89 42 30 8b 41 04 8b 13 8b 40 0c 89
>  <0>Kernel panic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
> In interrupt handler - not syncing
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
> Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
> Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. 
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id?66&op?k
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

-- 
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

[mpls-linux-general] Occasional kernel panic

[<Jon...@cs...>]

Dear all,

This Linux mpls implementation is great and I have had seven PCs running
for a couple months without any big drama.

However, I have encountered 4 occasions of kernel panic in one machine
and one more kernel panic in another machine during this time (please
see trace below for the latest event).

Would anyone happen to know what could have caused it? I am still using
mpls-Linux version 1.172 (@242) on a Mandrake 9.1 platform (kernel
2.4.21, P4 1.7GHz, 256M RAM).

Thanks for your information...

Best Regards,
Jonathan



Call Trace:
[<c0264f76>] mpls_output2+0xa6/0x1a0 [kernel]
[<c02650e6>] mpls_output_shim+0x76/0x140 [kernel]
[<c0265233>] mpls_output+0x83/0xc0 [kernel]
[<c022ee14>] ip_forward+0x1c4/0x2b0 [kernel]
[<c022e049>] ip_rcv_finish+0x1f9/0x260 [kernel]
[<c0219608>] netif_rx+0x78/0x180 [kernel]
[<c021999e>] netif_receive_skb+0x11e/0x1e0 [kernel]
[<c0219acf>] process_backlog+0x6f/0x110 [kernel]
[<c0219bda>] net_rx_action+0x6a/0x100 [kernel]
[<c01228d6>] do_softirq+0xa6/0xb0 [kernel]
[<c010aae0>] do_IRQ+0xb0/0xc0 [kernel]
[<C010d158>] call_do_IRQ+0x5/0xd [kernel]
[<e280a8a0>] E journal_blocks_per_page_R8187c971+0x3d0/0xffffabf0 [jbd]
[<e2803ec3>] E journal_get_write_acessRc22dd827+0x53/0x70 [jbd]
[<e2815ece>] E journal_blocks_per_page_R8187c971+0xbafe/0xffffabf0 [jbd]
[<e280322d>] E ___strtok_R29805c13+0x223f67c5/0xffd377d8
[<e280334d>] E ___strtok_R29805c13+0x223f68e5/0xffd377d8
[<e2815f68>] E journal_blocks_per_page_R8187c971+0xbb98/oxffffabf0 [jbd]
[<e2816071>] E journal_blocks_per_page_R8187c971+0xbca1/oxffffabf0 [jbd]
[<c01582b3>] __mark_inode_dirty+0x93/0xa0 [kernel]
[<c01593ea>] update_atime+0x6a/0x70 [kernel]
[<c01360ea>] generic_file_reaed+0x9a/0x150 [kernel]
[<c0135fd0>] file_read_actor+0x0/0x80 [kernel]
[<c0144342>] get_empty_filp+0x52/0x130 [kernel]
[<c014bc46>] kernel_read+0x66/0x70 [kernel]
[<c014c0ce>] prepare_binprm+0x12e/0x150 [kernel]
[<c014c549>] do_execve+0xb9/0x1d0 [kernel]
[<c0107c2d>] sys_execve+0x4d/0x80 [kernel]
[<c010938f>] system_call+0x33/0x38 [kernel]

Code: ff 40 04 8b 13 8b 41 04 89 42 30 8b 41 04 8b 13 8b 40 0c 89
 <0>Kernel panic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
In interrupt handler - not syncing

[mpls-linux-general] about mpls

[<che...@ho...>]

I have patched mpls-linux-1.172.tar to linux and 
compiled.Then I patch ldp-portable-0.310 to zebra-0.94.
First I input ‘zebra d’ in order to startup zebra.Second I 
input ‘mplsd’ in order to startup mpls.
Then the screen will print the following information:


MPLS: MPLSD (0.94) starts
MPLS: interface add lo index 1 flags 73 metric 1 mtu 
16436
MPLS: address add 127.0.0.1 to interface lo
MPLS: address add 0.0.0.0 to interface lo 
MPLS: interface add eth0 index 2 flags 4163 metric 1 
mtu 1500
MPLS: address add 202.112.146.244 to interface eth0
MPLS: address add 254.128.0.0 to interface eth0
MPLS: interface add eth1 index 3 flags 4099 metric 1 
mtu 1500
MPLS: address add 192.168.100.67 to interface eth1
MPLS: address add 254.128.0.0 to interface eth1
MPLS: interface add sit0 index 4 flags 128 metric 1 mtu 
1480
MPLS: router-id change 0.0.0.0
MPLS: route add 192.168.100.0/24
MPLS: ifindex 3
MPLS: route add 202.112.146.0/24
MPLS: ifindex 2


I have config 202.112.146.244 to interface eth0 and 
192.168.100.67 to interface eth1.
Why dose ‘the mplsd’ add two address on one interface?
Why dose router-id changed to 0.0.0.0? 
Please help me!Thank you very much!

_________________________________________________________________
免费下载 MSN Explorer:   http://explorer.msn.com/lccn