mpls-linux-general Mailing List for MPLS for Linux (Page 99)
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
Menu
▾
▴
mpls-linux-general — Mailing list for general discussion about MPLS for Linux
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(26) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(45) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(101) |
Jul
(79) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(71) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(111) |
Feb
(123) |
Mar
(67) |
Apr
(61) |
May
(75) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(79) |
Oct
(85) |
Nov
(58) |
Dec
(39) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(80) |
Apr
(56) |
May
(39) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(68) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(46) |
Oct
(89) |
Nov
(55) |
Dec
(33) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(74) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(105) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(48) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(81) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(40) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(69) |
May
(41) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(76) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(24) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(91) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(68) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(62) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(63) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
|
From: Itrat R. Q. <iq...@cc...> - 2004-06-01 16:01:43
|
OK, I tried the command
./iptables <other args> -j spec_nh --spec_nh 0x4788:0x2
but it didn=92t work.
My configuration is something like this
PC INGRESS LSR EGRESS PC
172.16.70.91 .90 .1 .10 .11 .12 .13 172.16.134.36
|--------------| |--------| |--------| |--------|=20
eth0 eth2 eth0 eth0 eth1 eth0 eth1 eth0
I am using the following iptable commands at the INGRESS
./iptables =96F
./iptables =96P INPUT DROP
./iptables =96P FORWARD DROP
./iptables =96A INPUT =96i lo =96d 127.0.0.1 =96j ACCEPT =
=20
./iptables =96A INPUT =96i eth2 =96d 172.16.134.36 =96j ACCEPT=20
./iptables =96A FORWARD =96i eth2 =96d 172.16.134.36 =96j ACCEPT
./iptables =96A OUTPUT =96o eth0 =96d 172.16.134.36 =96j spec_nh --spec_=
nh 0x8847:0x2=20
Kindly tell me if there is something wrong with these rules or their orde=
r, if=20
not then kindly mention the specific printk commands to add in the target=
()=20
function of the ipt_spec_nh.c file.
Thanks in advance once again.
|
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2004-06-01 14:39:22
|
I'd like to work with you to clean up the layout of the code, port to quagga, and integrate with my MPLS infrastructure work. If you are interested in such an effort, please respond to the list, otherwise I will begin the effort myself. Thank you for your contribution. BTW I didn't see a license or copyright in any of the files. You will probably want to do that. (I've CC'd the mpls-linux mailing list) -- James R. Leu jl...@mi... On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 01:03:08AM +0300, Vadim Suraev wrote: > Hi. > I'd like to contribute to the Zebra users & developers' community several software > modules that I've developed recently: > RSVP-TE, TE application, TE extensions for OSPF. > The software has been tested against CISCO. > If you decide to try it, please read the short manuel at: > http://www.angelfire.com/theforce/suraev/zebra/MPLS_TE_SW_manuel.txt > The code is located at: > http://www.angelfire.com/theforce/suraev/zebra/zebra.tar.gz > If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask. > Any request for any help and support is welcome. > > Regards, > Vadim. > _______________________________________________ > Quagga-dev mailing list > Qua...@li... > http://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev |
|
From: Jaime D. M. C. <me...@di...> - 2004-05-31 17:55:54
|
I'm trying to install mpls-linux, which to support uml. but i don't see=20 mpls_* files after to build new kernel.. any ideas?? jaime --=20 Jaime Daniel Mejia Castro (me...@di...) Departamento de Ingenier=EDa de Sistemas Telem=E1ticos Universidad Polit=E9cnica de Madrid ETSI Telecomunicaciones, Ciudad Universitaria (s/n) 28040 - Madrid tel: +34 913367366 ext 473 fax: +34 913367333 |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2004-05-28 17:19:43
|
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 07:14:42PM +0200, Andre Grueneberg wrote: > Hi James, > > James R. Leu wrote: > > I have not worked on quagga-ldp for sometime. I'm focusing my work > > on quagga-mpls, which implements a proper MPLS framework for quagga. > > I have just started the process of converting the mplsd code to be > > LDP specific. If you are interested in assisting with this work grab > > the latest version of quagga-mpls and ldp-portable and start hacking on > > the ldpd directory. > > An updated list of directories in the depot would be helpful, then. I > just started the sync. I'll see if I get some patches out. > > What do you think is the state of your changes? Will I be able to get > something running out of the box? No. Not even linking correctly yet. Lots of work to be done. > Andre > -- > And God said, "I'll buy a vowel." -- James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: Andre G. <an...@gr...> - 2004-05-28 17:14:57
|
Hi James, James R. Leu wrote: > I have not worked on quagga-ldp for sometime. I'm focusing my work > on quagga-mpls, which implements a proper MPLS framework for quagga. > I have just started the process of converting the mplsd code to be > LDP specific. If you are interested in assisting with this work grab > the latest version of quagga-mpls and ldp-portable and start hacking on > the ldpd directory. An updated list of directories in the depot would be helpful, then. I just started the sync. I'll see if I get some patches out. What do you think is the state of your changes? Will I be able to get something running out of the box? Andre --=20 And God said, "I'll buy a vowel." |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2004-05-28 17:00:59
|
I have not worked on quagga-ldp for sometime. I'm focusing my work on quagga-mpls, which implements a proper MPLS framework for quagga. I have just started the process of converting the mplsd code to be LDP specific. If you are interested in assisting with this work grab the latest version of quagga-mpls and ldp-portable and start hacking on the ldpd directory. On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:31:43PM +0200, Andre Grueneberg wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to install mpls-linux, which works quite smoothly. But when I > came to quagga, quite a few problems arose. > > I took quagga-mpls and quagga from the p4 depot, ran diff over them and > patched a Quagga 0.96.5 (Debian Source Package), which worked with some > minor tweaks. > > After I started mplsd, the problems began. Mplsd doesn't check the > address family of addresses assigned to the interfaces, leading to IPv6 > addresses being misinterpreted. So I hacked some checks for AF_INET. > > After that, I get segfaults on a 'write file' after I enabled 'mpls ldp' > and an infinite loop on > mpls ldp > lsr-id <addr> > > As both occur at some MPLS_LIST-handling, I suspect the problem to be > somewhere inside it. > Is someone with more insight to the code able to reproduce these > problems or will I have to debug it myself? > > I'd be pleased to get quagga-ldp running, but my time to dig inside the > 40k lines of code is rather limited. :/ > > Andre > -- > This message is closed-punchlined for the humor-impaired. -- James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: Andre G. <lis...@gr...> - 2004-05-28 16:37:24
|
Hi, [repost, because I chose a wrong From-address] I'm trying to install mpls-linux, which works quite smoothly. But when I came to quagga, quite a few problems arose. I took quagga-mpls and quagga from the p4 depot, ran diff over them and patched a Quagga 0.96.5 (Debian Source Package), which worked with some minor tweaks.=20 After I started mplsd, the problems began. Mplsd doesn't check the address family of addresses assigned to the interfaces, leading to IPv6 addresses being misinterpreted. So I hacked some checks for AF_INET.=20 After that, I get segfaults on a 'write file' after I enabled 'mpls ldp' and an infinite loop on mpls ldp lsr-id <addr> As both occur at some MPLS_LIST-handling, I suspect the problem to be somewhere inside it. Is someone with more insight to the code able to reproduce these problems or will I have to debug it myself? I'd be pleased to get quagga-ldp running, but my time to dig inside the 40k lines of code is rather limited. :/ Andre --=20 This message is closed-punchlined for the humor-impaired. |
|
From: Andre G. <an...@gr...> - 2004-05-28 16:33:27
|
Hi, I'm trying to install mpls-linux, which works quite smoothly. But when I came to quagga, quite a few problems arose. I took quagga-mpls and quagga from the p4 depot, ran diff over them and patched a Quagga 0.96.5 (Debian Source Package), which worked with some minor tweaks.=20 After I started mplsd, the problems began. Mplsd doesn't check the address family of addresses assigned to the interfaces, leading to IPv6 addresses being misinterpreted. So I hacked some checks for AF_INET.=20 After that, I get segfaults on a 'write file' after I enabled 'mpls ldp' and an infinite loop on mpls ldp lsr-id <addr> As both occur at some MPLS_LIST-handling, I suspect the problem to be somewhere inside it. Is someone with more insight to the code able to reproduce these problems or will I have to debug it myself? I'd be pleased to get quagga-ldp running, but my time to dig inside the 40k lines of code is rather limited. :/ Andre --=20 This message is closed-punchlined for the humor-impaired. |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2004-05-26 14:10:38
|
It could be that the MPLS iptables code has broken since I tested it. Are you willing to add some debugging code? If so put some 'printk's in the target() function in linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_spec_nh.c Looking at it quickly it could be a network byte order issue. Try this and see if it changes anything: ./iptables <other args> -j spec_nh --spec_nh 0x4788:0x2 On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 07:52:22PM +0300, Itrat Rasod Quadri wrote: > Thanks a bunch James and Pierre Ansel but unfortunately my problem is not over > yet, here is the output from "./iptables -t filter -L" at my ingress > > Chain INPUT (policy DROP) > target prot opt source destination > ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere 172.16.134.36 > ACCEPT udp -- anywhere 172.16.134.36 > ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere 172.16.134.36 > ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere bf01 (localhost) > ACCEPT udp -- anywhere bf01 > ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere bf01 > > Chain FORWARD (policy DROP) > target prot opt source destination > ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere 172.16.134.36 > ACCEPT udp -- anywhere 172.16.134.36 > ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere 172.16.134.36 > > Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) > target prot opt source destination > spec_nh all -- anywhere 172.16.134.36 set spec_nh 0x8847:0x00000002 > > Now when I ping 172.16.134.36 and do "tcpdump -xvp -i eth2" at the ip > interface at the ingress I get nothing but when I abort tcpdump I get the > response > > # of packets received by filter > 0 packets dropped by kernel > > where # is the number of packets received by the filter. If the packets are > being received by the filter how come I don't get to see the output and > neither are the packets being forwarded onto the MPLS interface. > > Need your kind assistance once again. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2004-05-26 14:03:30
|
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 01:30:06PM +0000, ?? ?? wrote: > Dear all > I have download ??perforce?? and install it .My system is WindowsXP. But > I don??t know how to use it to download the stuff from the server . I > have seen it??s guidance ,but I don??t know how to do yet . Can you give me > a detailed method ? > Thanks in advance! Since you are on WindowsXP what do you plan to do with the source once you get it? None of it will compile under windows or cygwin. You're probably wasting your time unless you use perforce on linux. Jim > _________________________________________________________________ > ???????? MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: <che...@ho...> - 2004-05-26 13:30:16
|
Dear all I have download “perforce” and install it .My system is WindowsXP. But I don’t know how to use it to download the stuff from the server . I have seen it’s guidance ,but I don’t know how to do yet . Can you give me a detailed method ? Thanks in advance! _________________________________________________________________ 免费下载 MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/ |
|
From: Itrat R. Q. <iq...@cc...> - 2004-05-26 11:36:43
|
When I run the following command ./iptables -A OUTPUT -d 172.16.134.36/32 -j spec_nh --spec_nh 0x8847:0x2 I get the error Unknown arg `spec_nh' your help required. |
|
From: Itrat R. Q. <iq...@cc...> - 2004-05-25 16:38:36
|
Thanks a bunch James and Pierre Ansel but unfortunately my problem is not over yet, here is the output from "./iptables -t filter -L" at my ingress Chain INPUT (policy DROP) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere 172.16.134.36 ACCEPT udp -- anywhere 172.16.134.36 ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere 172.16.134.36 ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere bf01 (localhost) ACCEPT udp -- anywhere bf01 ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere bf01 Chain FORWARD (policy DROP) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere 172.16.134.36 ACCEPT udp -- anywhere 172.16.134.36 ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere 172.16.134.36 Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination spec_nh all -- anywhere 172.16.134.36 set spec_nh 0x8847:0x00000002 Now when I ping 172.16.134.36 and do "tcpdump -xvp -i eth2" at the ip interface at the ingress I get nothing but when I abort tcpdump I get the response # of packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel where # is the number of packets received by the filter. If the packets are being received by the filter how come I don't get to see the output and neither are the packets being forwarded onto the MPLS interface. Need your kind assistance once again. |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2004-05-25 13:37:03
|
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 03:11:16PM +0300, Itrat Rasod Quadri wrote: > When I run the following command > > ./iptables -A OUTPUT -d 172.16.134.36/32 -j spec_nh --spec_nh 0x8847:0x2 It is difficult to run iptables without installing it because it is looking for modules to install. Try installing it and see if that helps. > I get the error > > Unknown arg `spec_nh' > > your help required. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: Pierre A. <pie...@po...> - 2004-05-25 12:56:57
|
I had the same problem. Did you try to load the libipt_spec_nh.so module ? modprobe libipt_spec_nh.so Pierre ----- Original Message ----- From: "Itrat Rasod Quadri" <iq...@cc...> To: <mpl...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 2:11 PM Subject: [mpls-linux-general] unable to run iptables command > When I run the following command > > ./iptables -A OUTPUT -d 172.16.134.36/32 -j spec_nh --spec_nh 0x8847:0x2 > > I get the error > > Unknown arg `spec_nh' > > your help required. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > |
|
From: Itrat R. Q. <iq...@cc...> - 2004-05-25 12:18:07
|
When I run the following command ./iptables -A OUTPUT -d 172.16.134.36/32 -j spec_nh --spec_nh 0x8847:0x2 I get the error Unknown arg `spec_nh' your help required. |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2004-05-25 02:26:11
|
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 11:01:31AM +0900, T. Take wrote: > Mr. Leu > > Thanks for your quick reply. > > I have reset LSPs on C as following. > > # mplsadm2 -L eth1:0 > # mplsadm2 -A -I gen:101:0 > # mplsadm2 -A -I gen:201:0 > # mplsadm2 -I gen:101:0 -i pop:peek > In Instr: No such device or address Hmm. I just excuted the above commands on 1.930 (on a 2.6.1 kernel) and it works fine. Obviously something must have changed since 1.172 and 1.930. I do not have a 2.4 kernel to test on. I will try and build a 2.4 environment to test and debug on. My gut response is to tell you to upgrade to 1.930 (which is based on a 2.6 kernel). > But they seemed to be set properly except the last command again. > How should I do this? > > The information of the machine is > > OS : Redhat 8.0 > kernel : 2.4.22 > mpls : mpls-linux-1.172 > > If you could take a few minutes to answer my question, I would really > appreciate it. > > Best regards > > >From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> > >Reply-To: jl...@mi... > >To: "T. Take" <t_t...@ho...> > >CC: mpl...@li... > >Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Egress Router, how? > >Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 09:05:47 -0500 > > > >On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 06:58:28PM +0900, T. Take wrote: > >> Hi. > >> > >> I have a similar problem. > >> I have executed "MPLS Hierarchy" in README and succeeded to setup 200 > and > >> 202 LSP. > >> > >> 101 > >> 200 201 202 > >> A------B------C------D > > > >Here is how I do it: > > > >on C > >---- > >mplsadm2 -A -I gen:101:0 > >mplsadm2 -A -I gen:201:0 > >mplsadm2 -I gen:101:0 -i pop:peek > > > >on B > >---- > >mplsadm2 -A -O 0 > >mplsadm2 -O 0x2 -o push:gen:101:set:eth1:192.169.1.2 > >mplsadm2 -A -O 0 > >mplsadm2 -O 0x3 -o push:gen:201:fwd:0x2 > >mplsadm2 -A -I gen:200:0 > >mplsadm2 -B -I gen:200:0 -O 0x3 > > > >> > >> But, I had a problem at "On C" setting about 101 and 201. The command > is > >> > >> # mplsadm2 -I gen:101:0 -i pop:peek > >> In Instr: No such device or address > >> > >> It didn't seem to be set properly. > >> When I have executed "mplsadm2 -d", the output of the above command is > >> > >> mpls_set_in_label_instructions: enter > >> mpls_in_info_hold: enter > >> mpls_in_info_hold: new count 2 > >> mpls_in_info_hold: exit > >> mpls_instruction_build: enter > >> mpls_instruction_build: exit(2) > >> mpls_instruction_clear: enter > >> mpls_instruction_clear: exit > >> mpls_in_info_release: enter > >> mpls_in_info_release: new count 1 > >> mpls_in_info_release: exit > >> mpls_set_in_label_structions: exit > >> > >> What should I do? > >> I hope any help. > > _________________________________________________________________ > ?$B%a%C%;%s%8%c!<$GAm3[1?$B2/1_%W%l%<%s%H!* http://im.msn.co.jp/home.htm -- James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: T. T. <t_t...@ho...> - 2004-05-25 02:01:38
|
Mr. Leu Thanks for your quick reply. I have reset LSPs on C as following. # mplsadm2 -L eth1:0 # mplsadm2 -A -I gen:101:0 # mplsadm2 -A -I gen:201:0 # mplsadm2 -I gen:101:0 -i pop:peek In Instr: No such device or address But they seemed to be set properly except the last command again. How should I do this? The information of the machine is OS : Redhat 8.0 kernel : 2.4.22 mpls : mpls-linux-1.172 If you could take a few minutes to answer my question, I would really appreciate it. Best regards >From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> >Reply-To: jl...@mi... >To: "T. Take" <t_t...@ho...> >CC: mpl...@li... >Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Egress Router, how? >Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 09:05:47 -0500 > >On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 06:58:28PM +0900, T. Take wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I have a similar problem. > > I have executed "MPLS Hierarchy" in README and succeeded to setup 200 and > > 202 LSP. > > > > 101 > > 200 201 202 > > A------B------C------D > >Here is how I do it: > >on C >---- >mplsadm2 -A -I gen:101:0 >mplsadm2 -A -I gen:201:0 >mplsadm2 -I gen:101:0 -i pop:peek > >on B >---- >mplsadm2 -A -O 0 >mplsadm2 -O 0x2 -o push:gen:101:set:eth1:192.169.1.2 >mplsadm2 -A -O 0 >mplsadm2 -O 0x3 -o push:gen:201:fwd:0x2 >mplsadm2 -A -I gen:200:0 >mplsadm2 -B -I gen:200:0 -O 0x3 > > > > > But, I had a problem at "On C" setting about 101 and 201. The command is > > > > # mplsadm2 -I gen:101:0 -i pop:peek > > In Instr: No such device or address > > > > It didn't seem to be set properly. > > When I have executed "mplsadm2 -d", the output of the above command is > > > > mpls_set_in_label_instructions: enter > > mpls_in_info_hold: enter > > mpls_in_info_hold: new count 2 > > mpls_in_info_hold: exit > > mpls_instruction_build: enter > > mpls_instruction_build: exit(2) > > mpls_instruction_clear: enter > > mpls_instruction_clear: exit > > mpls_in_info_release: enter > > mpls_in_info_release: new count 1 > > mpls_in_info_release: exit > > mpls_set_in_label_structions: exit > > > > What should I do? > > I hope any help. _________________________________________________________________ メッセンジャーで総額1億円プレゼント！ http://im.msn.co.jp/home.htm |
|
From: <nar...@tc...> - 2004-05-25 00:01:16
|
DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this message is intended only and solely for the addressed individual or entity indicated in this message and for the exclusive use of the said addressed individual or entity indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person) and may contain legally privileged and confidential information belonging to Tata Consultancy Services. It must not be printed, read, copied, disclosed, forwarded, distributed or used (in whatsoever manner) by any person other than the addressee. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited and may constitute unlawful act and can possibly attract legal action, civil and/or criminal. The contents of this message need not necessarily reflect or endorse the views of Tata Consultancy Services on any subject matter. Any action taken or omitted to be taken based on this message is entirely at your risk and neither the originator of this message nor Tata Consultancy Services takes any responsibility or liability towards the same. Opinions, conclusions and any other information contained in this message that do not relate to the official business of Tata Consultancy Services shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by Tata Consultancy Services or any affiliate of Tata Consultancy Services. If you have received this message in error, you should destroy this message and may please notify the sender by e-mail. Thank you. |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2004-05-24 19:31:41
|
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 12:52:57AM +0530, nar...@tc... wrote: > Dear all, > > I am new to this list. When i try to apply the patch to upgrade kernel for > MPLS using the below command: > > [root@localhost linux-kernel]# patch -pl < > ../mpls-linux/patches/linux-kernel.diff > patch: **** strip count l is not a number > [root@localhost linux-kernel]# That should be -p1 (one) not -pl (ele). > This giving an error above. Please advise how to go .... > > Narayanaswamy Ramamoorthy > Tata Consultancy Services > Mailto: nar...@tc... > Website: http://www.tcs.com > DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this message is intended only and solely for the addressed individual or entity indicated in this message and for the exclusive use of the said addressed individual or entity indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery > of the message to such person) and may contain legally privileged and confidential information belonging to Tata Consultancy Services. It must not be printed, read, copied, disclosed, forwarded, distributed or used (in whatsoever manner) by any person other than the > addressee. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited and may constitute unlawful act and can possibly attract legal action, civil and/or criminal. The contents of this message need not necessarily reflect or endorse the views of Tata Consultancy Services > on any subject matter. Any action taken or omitted to be taken based on this message is entirely at your risk and neither the originator of this message nor Tata Consultancy Services takes any responsibility or liability towards the same. Opinions, conclusions and any other > information contained in this message that do not relate to the official business of Tata Consultancy Services shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by Tata Consultancy Services or any affiliate of Tata Consultancy Services. If you have received this message in error, > you should destroy this message and may please notify the sender by e-mail. Thank you. > -- James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: <nar...@tc...> - 2004-05-24 19:23:06
|
DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this message is intended only and solely for the addressed individual or entity indicated in this message and for the exclusive use of the said addressed individual or entity indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person) and may contain legally privileged and confidential information belonging to Tata Consultancy Services. It must not be printed, read, copied, disclosed, forwarded, distributed or used (in whatsoever manner) by any person other than the addressee. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited and may constitute unlawful act and can possibly attract legal action, civil and/or criminal. The contents of this message need not necessarily reflect or endorse the views of Tata Consultancy Services on any subject matter. Any action taken or omitted to be taken based on this message is entirely at your risk and neither the originator of this message nor Tata Consultancy Services takes any responsibility or liability towards the same. Opinions, conclusions and any other information contained in this message that do not relate to the official business of Tata Consultancy Services shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by Tata Consultancy Services or any affiliate of Tata Consultancy Services. If you have received this message in error, you should destroy this message and may please notify the sender by e-mail. Thank you. |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2004-05-24 14:09:08
|
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 06:58:28PM +0900, T. Take wrote: > Hi. > > I have a similar problem. > I have executed "MPLS Hierarchy" in README and succeeded to setup 200 and > 202 LSP. > > 101 > 200 201 202 > A------B------C------D Here is how I do it: on C ---- mplsadm2 -A -I gen:101:0 mplsadm2 -A -I gen:201:0 mplsadm2 -I gen:101:0 -i pop:peek on B ---- mplsadm2 -A -O 0 mplsadm2 -O 0x2 -o push:gen:101:set:eth1:192.169.1.2 mplsadm2 -A -O 0 mplsadm2 -O 0x3 -o push:gen:201:fwd:0x2 mplsadm2 -A -I gen:200:0 mplsadm2 -B -I gen:200:0 -O 0x3 > > But, I had a problem at "On C" setting about 101 and 201. The command is > > # mplsadm2 -I gen:101:0 -i pop:peek > In Instr: No such device or address > > It didn't seem to be set properly. > When I have executed "mplsadm2 -d", the output of the above command is > > mpls_set_in_label_instructions: enter > mpls_in_info_hold: enter > mpls_in_info_hold: new count 2 > mpls_in_info_hold: exit > mpls_instruction_build: enter > mpls_instruction_build: exit(2) > mpls_instruction_clear: enter > mpls_instruction_clear: exit > mpls_in_info_release: enter > mpls_in_info_release: new count 1 > mpls_in_info_release: exit > mpls_set_in_label_structions: exit > > What should I do? > I hope any help. > > >From: Jung Janos <jj...@hs...> > >To: mpl...@li... > >Subject: [mpls-linux-general] Egress Router, how? > >Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:07:18 +0100 (MET) > > > >Hi! > > > >I have a simple network...: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >PC2 PC1 > > 10.130.0.0/16 > >eth0 -----------switch------eth1 > >0.6 0.20 > >--------- --------- > >| | | | > >| | | | > >| | | | > >--------- --------- > >0.6 0.20 > >eth1------------switch------eth0 > > 10.131.0.0/16 > > > >PC2 sends on his eth0 interface MPLS packets with label=1024 (not via > >mplsadm) > >(with destination IP=10.131.0.6 (his other IP)) > >PC1 receives this packets, and i would like PC1 to pop the label > >and forward it as an IP packet (check the route table, and then > >forward it to PC2-eth1) > >PC1 runns mplsadm2... > > > >How should i do that? > > > >i tried: > >PC1: > >mplsadm2 -vL eth1:0 > >mplsadm2 -vAI gen:1024:0 > >mplsadm2 -vI gen:1024:0 -i pop:peek > >no such device or address > > > >any idea????????? > >How should i do that? > > _________________________________________________________________ > ?$B%a%C%;%s%8%c!<$GAm3[1?$B2/1_%W%l%<%s%H!* http://im.msn.co.jp/home.htm > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: T. T. <t_t...@ho...> - 2004-05-24 09:58:34
|
Hi.
I have a similar problem.
I have executed "MPLS Hierarchy" in README and succeeded to setup 200 and
202 LSP.
101
200 201 202
A------B------C------D
But, I had a problem at "On C" setting about 101 and 201. The command is
# mplsadm2 -I gen:101:0 -i pop:peek
In Instr: No such device or address
It didn't seem to be set properly.
When I have executed "mplsadm2 -d", the output of the above command is
mpls_set_in_label_instructions: enter
mpls_in_info_hold: enter
mpls_in_info_hold: new count 2
mpls_in_info_hold: exit
mpls_instruction_build: enter
mpls_instruction_build: exit(2)
mpls_instruction_clear: enter
mpls_instruction_clear: exit
mpls_in_info_release: enter
mpls_in_info_release: new count 1
mpls_in_info_release: exit
mpls_set_in_label_structions: exit
What should I do?
I hope any help.
>From: Jung Janos <jj...@hs...>
>To: mpl...@li...
>Subject: [mpls-linux-general] Egress Router, how?
>Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:07:18 +0100 (MET)
>
>Hi!
>
>I have a simple network...:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>PC2 PC1
> 10.130.0.0/16
>eth0 -----------switch------eth1
>0.6 0.20
>--------- ---------
>| | | |
>| | | |
>| | | |
>--------- ---------
>0.6 0.20
>eth1------------switch------eth0
> 10.131.0.0/16
>
>PC2 sends on his eth0 interface MPLS packets with label=1024 (not via
>mplsadm)
>(with destination IP=10.131.0.6 (his other IP))
>PC1 receives this packets, and i would like PC1 to pop the label
>and forward it as an IP packet (check the route table, and then
>forward it to PC2-eth1)
>PC1 runns mplsadm2...
>
>How should i do that?
>
>i tried:
>PC1:
>mplsadm2 -vL eth1:0
>mplsadm2 -vAI gen:1024:0
>mplsadm2 -vI gen:1024:0 -i pop:peek
>no such device or address
>
>any idea?????????
>How should i do that?
_________________________________________________________________
メッセンジャーで総額1億円プレゼント！ http://im.msn.co.jp/home.htm
|
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2004-05-18 20:55:53
|
Give me the exact command your running, and the exact error your getting. On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 06:22:03PM +0300, Itrat Rasod Quadri wrote: > Okay, I got the source rpm, got the source files for iproute, patched it > compiled it but still when I run it I get the same old error > > Error: Either "to" is duplicate or "lsp" is a garbage > > and I am executing the ip command from ../iproute2/ip so I cannot figure out > the possible problem whereas the mplsadm2 commands are working correctly. > > waiting for your help. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband > Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest > 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: Itrat R. Q. <iq...@cc...> - 2004-05-18 20:46:31
|
Okay, I got the source rpm, got the source files for iproute, patched it compiled it but still when I run it I get the same old error Error: Either "to" is duplicate or "lsp" is a garbage and I am executing the ip command from ../iproute2/ip so I cannot figure out the possible problem whereas the mplsadm2 commands are working correctly. waiting for your help. |
533 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
