mpls-linux-general — Mailing list for general discussion about MPLS for Linux

[mpls-linux-general] Re: Again about labelspaces and interfaces

[jrussi <jr...@uo...>]

Hello again,

Sure I agree that your program is very  flexible and
elegant. Congratulations!

It's so cool that I'm  trying to develop software tools for
a lab for teaching network management and provisioning of TE
mpls using it.

It's just the begining, and so far everything is working
very well with your software. Thank you for offering your help.

For better control, in order I can see what every ILM
interface is receiving, I will use a per-interface
configuration of labelspace.

Regards,

Josdeyvi


 On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:22:41AM -0300, Josdeyvi Russi wrote:
 > Hi Leu,
 > 
 > Sorry asking it again to you, but I?m really trying to
understand the labelspace concept
in MPLS for Linux. 
 > 
 > Now that you can have the number of packets and bytes
that one ILM entry receive, what
means when you have two or more interfaces at the same
labelspace?
 >  
 > I don?t know, but I was thinking if the best was not
allowing two or more interfaces with
the same labelspace. In fact, there is one statement at the
Developer?s guide that say that
this implementation was to be labelspace per-interface and
not per-plataform.
 
 > What do you think?
 
 I believe my implementation of labelspace is as flexible as
any developer
 could desire.  If a developer chooses to assign only one
interface
 per labelspace, so be it, my implementation will not stop
them.  If they
 would like to add muliple interfaces to a labelspace, my
implementation
 supports it.
 
 The current implementation is elegant in it"s simplicity
for handling
 the global labelspace and hierarchy.
 
 Is there some feature you are looking for that cannot be
handle with the
 current implementation?
 
 > By the way, did you saw the "pops" bug I sent? It is
really a bug or I?m wrong?
 
 Yes it is a bug.  I have yet to have time in which to fix it.
 
 > Thank you,
 > 
 > Josdeyvi
 -- 
 James R. Leu
 jleu@mi...
 =0A =0A_________________________________________________________________=
_________=0AAcabe com aquelas janelinhas que pulam na sua tela.=0AAntiPop=
-up UOL - =C9 gr=E1tis!=0Ahttp://antipopup.uol.com.br/=0A

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Again about labelspaces and interfaces

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:22:41AM -0300, Josdeyvi Russi wrote:
> Hi Leu,
>=20
> Sorry asking it again to you, but I?m really trying to understand the lab=
elspace concept in MPLS for Linux.=20
>=20
> Now that you can have the number of packets and bytes that one ILM entry =
receive, what means when you have two or more interfaces at the same labels=
pace?
> =20
> I don?t know, but I was thinking if the best was not allowing two or more=
 interfaces with the same labelspace. In fact, there is one statement at th=
e Developer?s guide that say that this implementation was to be labelspace =
per-interface and not per-plataform.

> What do you think?

I believe my implementation of labelspace is as flexible as any developer
could desire.  If a developer chooses to assign only one interface
per labelspace, so be it, my implementation will not stop them.  If they
would like to add muliple interfaces to a labelspace, my implementation
supports it.

The current implementation is elegant in it's simplicity for handling
the global labelspace and hierarchy.

Is there some feature you are looking for that cannot be handle with the
current implementation?

> By the way, did you saw the "pops" bug I sent? It is really a bug or I?m =
wrong?

Yes it is a bug.  I have yet to have time in which to fix it.

> Thank you,
>=20
> Josdeyvi
--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

[mpls-linux-general] Again about labelspaces and interfaces

[Josdeyvi R. <jr...@uo...>]

Hi Leu,

Sorry asking it again to you, but I=B4m really trying to understand the =
labelspace concept in MPLS for Linux.=20

Now that you can have the number of packets and bytes that one ILM entry =
receive, what means when you have two or more interfaces at the same =
labelspace?
=20
I don=B4t know, but I was thinking if the best was not allowing two or =
more interfaces with the same labelspace. In fact, there is one =
statement at the Developer=B4s guide that say that this implementation =
was to be labelspace per-interface and not per-plataform.

What do you think?

By the way, did you saw the "pops" bug I sent? It is really a bug or =
I=B4m wrong?

Thank you,

Josdeyvi

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Compile quagga-0.97.3 fail

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

I would try posting a question to the quagga-users mailing list and
see if anyone knows how to get your cross compiler env to 'configure'
correctly.

On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 11:06:35PM +0800, Jiun-Shian Ho wrote:
> Yes, it's failed when compile zebra/rt_socket.c (no matter patch mpls or=
=20
> not)
> I also search old quagga mail-list archieve
>=20
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dquagga-dev&m=3D110170391106010&w=3D2
>=20
> but also no answer.
> attatch is my config.log.bz2 (without mpls patch)
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----=20
> From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...>
> To: "Jiun-Shian Ho" <as...@sy...>
> Cc: <ble...@in...>; <mpl...@li...>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 10:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Compile quagga-0.97.3 fail
>=20



--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Compile quagga-0.97.3 fail

[Jiun-Shian H. <as...@sy...>]

Yes, it's failed when compile zebra/rt_socket.c (no matter patch mpls or 
not)
I also search old quagga mail-list archieve

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=quagga-dev&m=110170391106010&w=2

but also no answer.
attatch is my config.log.bz2 (without mpls patch)



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...>
To: "Jiun-Shian Ho" <as...@sy...>
Cc: <ble...@in...>; <mpl...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Compile quagga-0.97.3 fail

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Mapping traffic to a LSP using iptables

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

Did you download the iptables RPM from http://mpls-linux.sf.net/
or patch/compile iptables by hand?

On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 02:41:18PM +0200, Claus Holst wrote:
> After executing the following commands:
>=20
> mpls nhlfe add key 0
> mpls nhlfe change key 0x2 instructions push gen 10000 nexthop eth0 ipv4 1=
30.225.185.243
> iptables -A OUTPUT -d 130.225.185.241 -j spec_nh --spec_nh 0x8847:0x2
>=20
> I get the following error:
>=20
> iptables: No chain/target/match by that name
>=20
> I guess it is the target that is wrong?
>=20
> Regards,
> Claus
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6595&alloc_id=3D14396&op=3Dclick
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

Re: [mpls-linux-general] backup path, CR_LDP

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

No one has written RSVP-TE or CR-LDP signaling for mpls-linux.
(Actually an RSVP-TE implementation does exist, google for 'RSVP-TE mpls-li=
nux'
and you will find more info)

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 06:42:41PM +0200, Miquel Casanovas Puigvi wrote:
> Hello, I am Student of ETIS from Spain
>=20
> I create a experimental plataform of routing with 6 computers. In my
> experiment I have one path under mpls and run correctly. But, can I create
> the alternative path for when the primary path failed.
>=20
>=20
> Your see my esqueme:
>=20
> 		(primary path is host_2, host_4)
>=20
>               host_2 -------- host_4
> 	      |			   |
>   (source)    |      	           |        (destin)
>    host_1 ----|			   |----host_6
> 	      |			   |
> 	      |			   |
> 	      host_3 -------- host_5
>=20
> 			(the alternetive path is host_3, and host_4)
>=20
>=20
> How to detect that path is failed? There is something program I can use
> for monitoring the link between hosts and that soported mpls?
>=20
> And, when the link failed, there is any signal that indicate this state.
> Is implemented the CR_LDP and RSVP_TE signal in mpls_linux?
>=20
> I can find information envelope mpls and backup path?
>=20
>=20
> thank you!!!!!
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6595&alloc_id=3D14396&op=3Dclick
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Compile quagga-0.97.3 fail

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 10:24:00PM +0800, Jiun-Shian Ho wrote:
> I download the original quagga-0.97.3.tar.gz and patch quagga.diff from
> mpls-linux-0.946a
> now I can get zmpls.c
> and I run the automake and autoconf (native tool, not cross tool)
> However, I got the same error message.
> My platform is FC-3 and my cross tool-chain is arm-elf from uClinux.org

I think it is related to it attempting to compile rt_socket.c
On linux it should use rt_netlink.c  I think your 'configure' is not
detecting your system correctly.  Can you build quagga 0.97.3 without
the MPLS patch?

> ----- Original Message -----=20
> From: <ble...@in...>
> To: "Jiun-Shian Ho" <as...@sy...>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 8:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Compile quagga-0.97.3 fail
>=20
>=20
> When you patch your quagga, the file is located here :
> /usr/src/quagga-0.97.3/lib/zmpls.c
>=20
> I think you must install automake and autoconf with packages.
> It depends on you distribution
>=20
> Selon Jiun-Shian Ho <as...@sy...>:
>=20
> > Hi,
> >     Could you talk more,
> > quagga-0.97.3-1.FC3.tar.bz2 do not include zmpls.c
> > and  how can I automake and autoconf  for cross compiler ?
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <ble...@in...>
> > To: "Jiun-Shian Ho" <as...@sy...>
> > Cc: <mpl...@li...>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 6:01 PM
> > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Compile quagga-0.97.3 fail
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > You have to lookup to the file zmpls.c
> > When you patch quagga, you need to have automake and autoconf installed=
 in
> > order
> > to regenerate the makefiles.
> > verify it
> >
> >
> > Selon Jiun-Shian Ho <as...@sy...>:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >     I compile quagga-0.97.3 from mpls-linux.sf.net with cross-compiler
> > > (arm-elf)
> > > and fail with below message
> > >
> > > rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_rtm_ipv4':
> > > rt_socket.c:103: error: `RTM_ADD' undeclared (first use in this
> > > function)
> > > rt_socket.c:103: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
> > > once
> > > rt_socket.c:103: error: for each function it appears in.)
> > > rt_socket.c:108: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this
> > > function)
> > > rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_add_ipv4':
> > > rt_socket.c:197: error: `RTM_ADD' undeclared (first use in this
> > > function)
> > > rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_delete_ipv4':
> > > rt_socket.c:211: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this
> > > function)
> > > rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_rtm_ipv6_multipath':
> > > rt_socket.c:343: error: `RTM_ADD' undeclared (first use in this
> > > function)
> > > rt_socket.c:348: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this
> > > function)
> > > rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_add_ipv6':
> > > rt_socket.c:447: error: `RTM_ADD' undeclared (first use in this
> > > function)
> > > rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_delete_ipv6':
> > > rt_socket.c:461: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this
> > > function)
> > > rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_delete_ipv6_old':
> > > rt_socket.c:477: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this
> > > function)
> > > make[2]: *** [rt_socket.o] Error 1
> > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/work/mpls/work/quagga-0.97.3/zebra'
> > > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/work/mpls/work/quagga-0.97.3'
> > > make: *** [all] Error 2
> > >
> > >
> > > I search whole system can not find RTM_ADD or RTM_DELETE.
> > > Can anyone kind give me some hints ?
> > >
> > > Bets regards,
> > > JS H.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real use=
rs.
> > > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6595&alloc_id=3D14396&op=3Dclick
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > mpls-linux-general mailing list
> > > mpl...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> >
> >
> >
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6595&alloc_id=3D14396&op=3Dclick
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Compile quagga-0.97.3 fail

[Jiun-Shian H. <as...@sy...>]

I download the original quagga-0.97.3.tar.gz and patch quagga.diff from
mpls-linux-0.946a
now I can get zmpls.c
and I run the automake and autoconf (native tool, not cross tool)
However, I got the same error message.
My platform is FC-3 and my cross tool-chain is arm-elf from uClinux.org



----- Original Message ----- 
From: <ble...@in...>
To: "Jiun-Shian Ho" <as...@sy...>
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Compile quagga-0.97.3 fail


When you patch your quagga, the file is located here :
/usr/src/quagga-0.97.3/lib/zmpls.c

I think you must install automake and autoconf with packages.
It depends on you distribution

Selon Jiun-Shian Ho <as...@sy...>:

> Hi,
>     Could you talk more,
> quagga-0.97.3-1.FC3.tar.bz2 do not include zmpls.c
> and  how can I automake and autoconf  for cross compiler ?
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <ble...@in...>
> To: "Jiun-Shian Ho" <as...@sy...>
> Cc: <mpl...@li...>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 6:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] Compile quagga-0.97.3 fail
>
>
> Hi,
>
> You have to lookup to the file zmpls.c
> When you patch quagga, you need to have automake and autoconf installed in
> order
> to regenerate the makefiles.
> verify it
>
>
> Selon Jiun-Shian Ho <as...@sy...>:
>
> > Hi,
> >     I compile quagga-0.97.3 from mpls-linux.sf.net with cross-compiler
> > (arm-elf)
> > and fail with below message
> >
> > rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_rtm_ipv4':
> > rt_socket.c:103: error: `RTM_ADD' undeclared (first use in this
> > function)
> > rt_socket.c:103: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
> > once
> > rt_socket.c:103: error: for each function it appears in.)
> > rt_socket.c:108: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this
> > function)
> > rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_add_ipv4':
> > rt_socket.c:197: error: `RTM_ADD' undeclared (first use in this
> > function)
> > rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_delete_ipv4':
> > rt_socket.c:211: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this
> > function)
> > rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_rtm_ipv6_multipath':
> > rt_socket.c:343: error: `RTM_ADD' undeclared (first use in this
> > function)
> > rt_socket.c:348: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this
> > function)
> > rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_add_ipv6':
> > rt_socket.c:447: error: `RTM_ADD' undeclared (first use in this
> > function)
> > rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_delete_ipv6':
> > rt_socket.c:461: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this
> > function)
> > rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_delete_ipv6_old':
> > rt_socket.c:477: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this
> > function)
> > make[2]: *** [rt_socket.o] Error 1
> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/work/mpls/work/quagga-0.97.3/zebra'
> > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/work/mpls/work/quagga-0.97.3'
> > make: *** [all] Error 2
> >
> >
> > I search whole system can not find RTM_ADD or RTM_DELETE.
> > Can anyone kind give me some hints ?
> >
> > Bets regards,
> > JS H.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpls-linux-general mailing list
> > mpl...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general
> >
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>
>
>




----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

[mpls-linux-general] Mapping traffic to a LSP using iptables

[Claus H. <200...@ei...>]

After executing the following commands:

mpls nhlfe add key 0
mpls nhlfe change key 0x2 instructions push gen 10000 nexthop eth0 ipv4 130.225.185.243
iptables -A OUTPUT -d 130.225.185.241 -j spec_nh --spec_nh 0x8847:0x2

I get the following error:

iptables: No chain/target/match by that name

I guess it is the target that is wrong?

Regards,
Claus

[mpls-linux-general] Missing /lib/iptables/libipt_MPLS.so when using iptables

[Claus H. <200...@ei...>]

When executing the command:

iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -d 130.225.185.241/32 -j MPLS

I get the following error:

iptables v1.2.11: Couldn't load target
`MPLS':/lib/iptables/libipt_MPLS.so: cannot open shared object file: No
such file or directory

When looking at the files installed using
iptables-1.2.11-3.1.FC3mpls1_946.i386.rpm, libipt_MPLS.so is missing.

Is there another way of using iptables without libipt_MPLS.so?

Regards,
Claus

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Compile quagga-0.97.3 fail

[<ble...@in...>]

Hi,

You have to lookup to the file zmpls.c
When you patch quagga, you need to have automake and autoconf installed in order
to regenerate the makefiles.
verify it


Selon Jiun-Shian Ho <as...@sy...>:

> Hi,
>     I compile quagga-0.97.3 from mpls-linux.sf.net with cross-compiler
> (arm-elf)
> and fail with below message
>
> rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_rtm_ipv4':
> rt_socket.c:103: error: `RTM_ADD' undeclared (first use in this function)
> rt_socket.c:103: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> rt_socket.c:103: error: for each function it appears in.)
> rt_socket.c:108: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_add_ipv4':
> rt_socket.c:197: error: `RTM_ADD' undeclared (first use in this function)
> rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_delete_ipv4':
> rt_socket.c:211: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_rtm_ipv6_multipath':
> rt_socket.c:343: error: `RTM_ADD' undeclared (first use in this function)
> rt_socket.c:348: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_add_ipv6':
> rt_socket.c:447: error: `RTM_ADD' undeclared (first use in this function)
> rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_delete_ipv6':
> rt_socket.c:461: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_delete_ipv6_old':
> rt_socket.c:477: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> make[2]: *** [rt_socket.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/work/mpls/work/quagga-0.97.3/zebra'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/work/mpls/work/quagga-0.97.3'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
>
>
> I search whole system can not find RTM_ADD or RTM_DELETE.
> Can anyone kind give me some hints ?
>
> Bets regards,
> JS H.
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general
>




----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

[mpls-linux-general] Compile quagga-0.97.3 fail

[Jiun-Shian H. <as...@sy...>]

Hi,
    I compile quagga-0.97.3 from mpls-linux.sf.net with cross-compiler 
(arm-elf)
and fail with below message

rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_rtm_ipv4':
rt_socket.c:103: error: `RTM_ADD' undeclared (first use in this function)
rt_socket.c:103: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
rt_socket.c:103: error: for each function it appears in.)
rt_socket.c:108: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this function)
rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_add_ipv4':
rt_socket.c:197: error: `RTM_ADD' undeclared (first use in this function)
rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_delete_ipv4':
rt_socket.c:211: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this function)
rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_rtm_ipv6_multipath':
rt_socket.c:343: error: `RTM_ADD' undeclared (first use in this function)
rt_socket.c:348: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this function)
rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_add_ipv6':
rt_socket.c:447: error: `RTM_ADD' undeclared (first use in this function)
rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_delete_ipv6':
rt_socket.c:461: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this function)
rt_socket.c: In function `kernel_delete_ipv6_old':
rt_socket.c:477: error: `RTM_DELETE' undeclared (first use in this function)
make[2]: *** [rt_socket.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/work/mpls/work/quagga-0.97.3/zebra'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/work/mpls/work/quagga-0.97.3'
make: *** [all] Error 2


I search whole system can not find RTM_ADD or RTM_DELETE.
Can anyone kind give me some hints ?

Bets regards,
JS H.

[mpls-linux-general] backup path, CR_LDP

[Miquel C. P. <u10...@co...>]

Hello, I am Student of ETIS from Spain

I create a experimental plataform of routing with 6 computers. In my
experiment I have one path under mpls and run correctly. But, can I create
the alternative path for when the primary path failed.


Your see my esqueme:

		(primary path is host_2, host_4)

              host_2 -------- host_4
	      |			   |
  (source)    |      	           |        (destin)
   host_1 ----|			   |----host_6
	      |			   |
	      |			   |
	      host_3 -------- host_5

			(the alternetive path is host_3, and host_4)


How to detect that path is failed? There is something program I can use
for monitoring the link between hosts and that soported mpls?

And, when the link failed, there is any signal that indicate this state.
Is implemented the CR_LDP and RSVP_TE signal in mpls_linux?

I can find information envelope mpls and backup path?


thank you!!!!!

Re: [mpls-linux-general] P2MP branching

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

There was a project at the university of virginia that did this.  I
have not gotten around to integrating the changes, but the work was very
good.

Google for "multicast mpls-linux" and I think you will find it.

On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 05:15:48PM +0200, mar...@ti... wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> is anybody in this mailing list aware of any add-on module to implement M=
PLS
> P2MP branching on a router that runs on mpls linux kernel?
>=20
> I need this to complete my degree thesis, so I'd really appreciate any su=
pport
> on this matter.
>=20
> Thank you,
>=20
> Marco
>=20
>=20
> __________________________________________________________________
> TISCALI ADSL 6 MEGA FLAT a soli 29.95 euro/mese!
> Con Tiscali Adsl 6 Mega Flat navighi con la SuperVelocita'
> a soli 29.95 euro al mese, senza limiti di tempo.
> E se attivi entro il 30 aprile, 3 MESI sono GRATIS!
> Scopri come risparmiare navigando veloce su
> http://abbonati.tiscali.it/adsl/sa/6flat_tc/
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id=14396&op?k
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

[mpls-linux-general] P2MP branching

[<mar...@ti...>]

Hi,

is anybody in this mailing list aware of any add-on module to implement M=
PLS
P2MP branching on a router that runs on mpls linux kernel?

I need this to complete my degree thesis, so I'd really appreciate any su=
pport
on this matter.

Thank you,

Marco


__________________________________________________________________
TISCALI ADSL 6 MEGA FLAT a soli 29.95 euro/mese!
Con Tiscali Adsl 6 Mega Flat navighi con la SuperVelocita'
a soli 29.95 euro al mese, senza limiti di tempo.
E se attivi entro il 30 aprile, 3 MESI sono GRATIS!
Scopri come risparmiare navigando veloce su
http://abbonati.tiscali.it/adsl/sa/6flat_tc/

[mpls-linux-general] Informations about ldp

[Julien C. <jul...@aq...>]

try LDP, i know that it is in test and not for users but.....



 PC1----PC2----PC3---PC4
 LER    LSR    LSR   LER

we start ldp on our 4 computers their are no crash of ldpd on this version.

In zebra we have somes labels (schema 1 (end of mail))
there are no "cross connects".
The ldp database (2) do not contain all the
network, and it do not affect labels to forward.

We can look more in details but we need more informations.

we must set a "fec" to make it work ??
we must set on ldpd that a router is a 'LER' or 'LSR' ? (command ?)
were is the file with all commands that can be set to ldpd,quagga ?
There is a hard limit on hop (max-hop-count) ? we can't set it.

Many commands that we type on zebra or ldpd do not appear in the running 
config.
In ldpd.conf we have egress connected that is impossible to set or un 
set with telnet.





Julien.



-----------------[ 1 ]----------------
Router# show mpls forwarding
Insegments:
  Lbl Spc  Label Owner
    0      10000 LDP
    0      10001 LDP
    0      10002 LDP
Total 3

Outsegments:

Total 0

Cross Connects:

Total 0

----------------------------


---------------[ 2 ] -------------------

uml-1# show ldp database
  10.0.2.0/24  remote binding:  no outlabel lsr: 10.0.3.18:0
  10.0.1.0/24  local binding:   label: gen 10000
  10.0.2.0/24  local binding:   label: gen 10001
  10.0.100.0/24  local binding:   label: gen 10002
  10.0.3.0/24  remote binding:  no outlabel lsr: 10.0.3.18:0
  10.0.200.0/24  remote binding:  no outlabel lsr: 10.0.3.18:0

--------------------------

-- 
---

Julien Cayssol
http://www.aqwz.com
Mobile : 33 664 973 067

[mpls-linux-general] OSPF API to generate Opaque LSAs

[Fahad D. <fah...@gm...>]

Hi,=20

I am using the OSPF client to generate Opaque LSAs. I am able to
generate all types(known such type 2,3) and unknown LSAs except those
for TE i.e Opaque LSAs of type 1. The log file shows the following
message:

2005/04/20 05:49:55 OSPF: ospf_register_opaque_functab: Duplicated
entry?: lsa_type(10), opaque_type(1)
2005/04/20 05:49:55 OSPF: Failed to register opaque type [10/1]

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Regards,
Fahad

Re: [mpls-linux-general] How do I map traffic to an LSP?

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

The LDP part of quagga-mpls is not ready for users, it is still in
development.  You can use the static LSP configuration though.
See the examples on http://mpls-linux.sf.net for more info.

You can use iptables to map traffic to a LSP.  You can also use iproute2
to map traffic to a LSP.  For iptables you can use all of the normal
iptables commands (google for a iptables howto) with the addition
of the spec_nh target (-j spec_nh --spec_nh 0x8847:0x2).  Here is a simple
iptables examples (you will want to google for a iptables howto to
learn more about iptables syntax):

    iptables -A OUTPUT -d 1.1.1.1/32 -j spec_nh --spec_nh 0x8847:0x2

0x2 is the key of a NHLFE

On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 08:18:22AM -0700, Florin Rosca wrote:
> Hello!
> I've installed quagga-mpls and managed to set 2 LSPs
> to the same network.
> Now I'm trying to map the ftp traffic, on destination
> port 21, to go by one LSP and the the other traffic to
> go on the other LSP.
> How do I do this?
> I tryed with "tc /qdisc/class/filter" command, but
> didn't manage.....
> How do I use iptables?
> I installed the rpm from quagga-mpls and when I type
> "mpls ldp" in ldpd I get disconected...what is
> happening?
> Thanks for your answers.....
> Florin=20
>=20
>=20
> 	=09
> __________________________________=20
> Do you Yahoo!?=20
> Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
> http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
> Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
> creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime in=
fo,
> new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

[mpls-linux-general] How do I map traffic to an LSP?

[Florin R. <rrr...@ya...>]

Hello!
I've installed quagga-mpls and managed to set 2 LSPs
to the same network.
Now I'm trying to map the ftp traffic, on destination
port 21, to go by one LSP and the the other traffic to
go on the other LSP.
How do I do this?
I tryed with "tc /qdisc/class/filter" command, but
didn't manage.....
How do I use iptables?
I installed the rpm from quagga-mpls and when I type
"mpls ldp" in ldpd I get disconected...what is
happening?
Thanks for your answers.....
Florin 


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Crash in getifaddrs() when using a mpls-enabled kernel

[Vincent U. <vin...@im...>]

I found the problem. I'll follow up on mpls-linux-devel since it will
probably involve code rework...

Le lundi 18 avril 2005 =C3=A0 21:02 +0200, Vincent Untz a =C3=A9crit :
> No : it's just crashing before it can do anything.
>=20
> When tcpdump starts, it looks for available interfaces by calling
> getifaddrs() to know on what interfaces it can listen. This call crashs
> if I've setup an ilm and does not crash if there's no ilm.
>=20
> There's absolutely no traffic occuring during my test. The crash is also
> reproducable with a small program that just calls getifaddrs().
>=20
> I've tried to debug this and it seems that getifaddrs() uses netlink to
> get the interfaces in glibc >=3D 2.3.3. And there's a bogus netlink
> RTM_NEWADDR (IIRC) message that is received when the crash is happening
> (the interface index is wrong, with a value like 6323421!).
>=20
> I don't know if it's a bug in mpls or in the glibc since 'ip link show'
> does not crash (and it uses netlink to get the list of interfaces
> too)...
>=20
> Le lundi 18 avril 2005 =C3=A0 13:06 -0500, James R. Leu a =C3=A9crit :
> > If I understand correctly, you're saying that tcpdump is crashing when
> > it tries to decode MPLS packets on the receive side?
> >=20
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 02:19:21PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >=20
> > > I'm experiencing the problem described in
> > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3D6272612&foru=
m_id=3D5051
> > >=20
> > > In order to make sure I was not doing something wrong, I installed a
> > > stock fedora core 2, used the rpm provided on the mpls-linux project
> > > page.
> > >=20
> > > Here are the steps to reproduce the crash:
> > >=20
> > > [root@tom3 root]# cat /sys/mpls/version
> > > 1.946
> > > [root@tom3 root]# mpls labelspace add dev eth0 labelspace 0
> > > [root@tom3 root]# mpls ilm add label gen 10000 labelspace 0
> > > [root@tom3 root]# mpls ilm show
> > > ILM entry label gen 10000 labelspace 0 proto ipv4
> > >         pop peek  (0 bytes, 0 pkts, 0 dropped)
> > > [root@tom3 root]# tcpdump
> > > Aborted
> > > [root@tom3 root]# tcpdump -i eth0
> > > tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol d=
ecode
> > > listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
> > > ...
> > > [root@tom3 root]# mpls ilm del label gen 10000 labelspace 0
> > > [root@tom3 root]# tcpdump
> > > tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol d=
ecode
> > > listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
> > > ...
> > >=20
> > > Here's a stack trace:
> > > (gdb) bt
> > > #0  0xffffe410 in ?? ()
> > > #1  0xbffff5b8 in ?? ()
> > > #2  0x00000006 in ?? ()
> > > #3  0x00000c9e in ?? ()
> > > #4  0xb7eebe59 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> > > #5  0xb7eed882 in abort () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> > > #6  0xb7f9d3fb in getifaddrs () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> > > #7  0x0808bedd in error ()
> > > #8  0x0808d0b9 in pcap_setnonblock_fd ()
> > > #9  0x08081264 in ?? ()
> > > #10 0xbffff8c0 in ?? ()
> > > #11 0xbffffa74 in ?? ()
> > > #12 0x080b14a8 in _IO_stdin_used ()
> > > #13 0x00000000 in ?? ()
> > >=20
> > > I can always reproduce this. Is there anything I can do to help?
> > >=20
> > > Thanks,
> > >=20
> > > Vincent
> > >=20
> > > --=20
> > > Les gens heureux ne sont pas press??s.
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> Vincent
>=20

Vincent

--=20
Les gens heureux ne sont pas press=C3=A9s.

Re: [mpls-linux-general] Crash in getifaddrs() when using a mpls-enabled kernel

[Vincent U. <vin...@im...>]

No : it's just crashing before it can do anything.

When tcpdump starts, it looks for available interfaces by calling
getifaddrs() to know on what interfaces it can listen. This call crashs
if I've setup an ilm and does not crash if there's no ilm.

There's absolutely no traffic occuring during my test. The crash is also
reproducable with a small program that just calls getifaddrs().

I've tried to debug this and it seems that getifaddrs() uses netlink to
get the interfaces in glibc >=3D 2.3.3. And there's a bogus netlink
RTM_NEWADDR (IIRC) message that is received when the crash is happening
(the interface index is wrong, with a value like 6323421!).

I don't know if it's a bug in mpls or in the glibc since 'ip link show'
does not crash (and it uses netlink to get the list of interfaces
too)...

Le lundi 18 avril 2005 =C3=A0 13:06 -0500, James R. Leu a =C3=A9crit :
> If I understand correctly, you're saying that tcpdump is crashing when
> it tries to decode MPLS packets on the receive side?
>=20
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 02:19:21PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >=20
> > I'm experiencing the problem described in
> > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3D6272612&forum_=
id=3D5051
> >=20
> > In order to make sure I was not doing something wrong, I installed a
> > stock fedora core 2, used the rpm provided on the mpls-linux project
> > page.
> >=20
> > Here are the steps to reproduce the crash:
> >=20
> > [root@tom3 root]# cat /sys/mpls/version
> > 1.946
> > [root@tom3 root]# mpls labelspace add dev eth0 labelspace 0
> > [root@tom3 root]# mpls ilm add label gen 10000 labelspace 0
> > [root@tom3 root]# mpls ilm show
> > ILM entry label gen 10000 labelspace 0 proto ipv4
> >         pop peek  (0 bytes, 0 pkts, 0 dropped)
> > [root@tom3 root]# tcpdump
> > Aborted
> > [root@tom3 root]# tcpdump -i eth0
> > tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol dec=
ode
> > listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
> > ...
> > [root@tom3 root]# mpls ilm del label gen 10000 labelspace 0
> > [root@tom3 root]# tcpdump
> > tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol dec=
ode
> > listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
> > ...
> >=20
> > Here's a stack trace:
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0  0xffffe410 in ?? ()
> > #1  0xbffff5b8 in ?? ()
> > #2  0x00000006 in ?? ()
> > #3  0x00000c9e in ?? ()
> > #4  0xb7eebe59 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> > #5  0xb7eed882 in abort () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> > #6  0xb7f9d3fb in getifaddrs () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> > #7  0x0808bedd in error ()
> > #8  0x0808d0b9 in pcap_setnonblock_fd ()
> > #9  0x08081264 in ?? ()
> > #10 0xbffff8c0 in ?? ()
> > #11 0xbffffa74 in ?? ()
> > #12 0x080b14a8 in _IO_stdin_used ()
> > #13 0x00000000 in ?? ()
> >=20
> > I can always reproduce this. Is there anything I can do to help?
> >=20
> > Thanks,
> >=20
> > Vincent
> >=20
> > --=20
> > Les gens heureux ne sont pas press??s.
>=20
>=20
>=20
Vincent

--=20
Les gens heureux ne sont pas press=C3=A9s.

Re: [mpls-linux-general] problem with ldpd in quagga

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 08:48:31PM +0200, Bertrand Lemaitre wrote:
> So, If i downloaded the quagga 0.97 in your site and I patched it with the
> quagga patch located in mpls-linux, I have a good version of ldp ?

You will not have the latest fixes, but yes you will have all you need
to compile a 'running' version of ldpd.  If you search the mailing list tho=
ugh
you will see that ldpd is not ready for users yet.  It is still very much
in development and I highly doubt you will get cisco and ldpd to talk with
out ldpd crashing.

>=20
> Thanks a lot...
>=20
> Tomorrow, play with cisco and linux-mpls !
>=20
> Bertrand Lemaitre
> ble...@in... - http://www.infochti.net
> Ing?nieur 3?me ann?e - ESIAL www.esial.uhp-nancy.fr
>=20
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : James R. Leu [mailto:jl...@mi...]
> Envoy? : lundi 18 avril 2005 20:32
> ? : Bertrand Lemaitre
> Cc : mpl...@li...
> Objet : Re: [mpls-linux-general] problem with ldpd in quagga
>=20
> A compiled version of quagga-mpls uses the ldp-portable source to
> implement ldpd.  If you are usign pre-compiled binaried, then you
> do not need to download ldp-portable.  If you are going to help with
> fixing ldpd, then you will need the quagga-mpls and ldp-portable source
> files.
>=20
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 08:25:13PM +0200, Bertrand Lemaitre wrote:
> > Thanks for the answers.
> > So, I don't need to install ldp-portable because quagga / mpls seems to
> > implement ldp soon... ?
> >
> > Bertrand Lemaitre
> > ble...@in... - http://www.infochti.net
> > Ing?nieur 3?me ann?e - ESIAL www.esial.uhp-nancy.fr
> >
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : James R. Leu [mailto:jl...@mi...]
> > Envoy? : lundi 18 avril 2005 20:13
> > ? : Bertrand Lemaitre
> > Cc : mpl...@li...
> > Objet : Re: [mpls-linux-general] problem with ldpd in quagga
> >
> > Yes.  The syntax of the global LDP command has changes from 'mpls ip'
> > (which is what is in your sample) to 'mpls ldp'.  I would suggest start=
ing
> > with a nearly empty ldpd.conf and configuring it via the ldpd CLI.
> >
> > There is a know issue with starting ldpd with a full config.  The work
> > around is to configure ldpd from scratch each time.
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 07:37:12PM +0200, Bertrand Lemaitre wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > When I try to launch ldp installed with quagga, I have this error :
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mpls ip : command not recognized?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Any idea ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Bertrand Lemaitre
> > >
> > > ble...@in... - http://www.infochti.net
> > >
> > > Ing?nieur 3?me ann?e - ESIAL www.esial.uhp-nancy.fr
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >   _____
> > >
> > > avast! Antivirus <http://www.avast.com> : message Sortant propre.
> > >
> > >
> > > Base de donnee virale (VPS): 0516-0, 18/04/2005
> > > Test du: 18/04/2005 19:37:12
> > > avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > James R. Leu
> > jl...@mi...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >   _____=20
> >
> > avast! Antivirus <http://www.avast.com> : message Sortant propre.
> >
> >
> > Base de donnee virale (VPS): 0516-0, 18/04/2005
> > Test du: 18/04/2005 20:25:13
> > avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software.
> >
> >
> >
>=20
> --
> James R. Leu
> jl...@mi...
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>   _____ =20
>=20
> avast! Antivirus <http://www.avast.com> : message Sortant propre.=20
>=20
>=20
> Base de donnee virale (VPS): 0516-0, 18/04/2005
> Test du: 18/04/2005 20:48:31
> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software.
>=20
>=20
>=20

--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

Re: [mpls-linux-general] unsusbsrcibe

[James R. L. <jl...@mi...>]

The simple answer it so look in the headers of every email that goes to
the email list and use the URLs listed, but I prefer this answer.
(not meant to be a flame, I just think it is a creative
way to say the above :-)

Cheers

Here is a step-by-step process on how to get unsubscribed from any
Sourceforge mailing list.

You will need the following:

o Rum
o Creme of Coconut
o Pineapple Juice
o Ice, crushed is best
o Pineapple wedge & cherry garnish
o a Glass
o a Straw
o a Blender

1) Pour 4 oz. of Creme of Coconut into the blender
2) Pour 4 ounces of Pineapple Juice into the blender
3) Add 3 ounces of Rum (leave off if your religion or personal
   preferences disagree with alchohol)
4) Add about 2 cups of crushed ice
5) Blend till smooth
6) Garnish with a cherry and wedge of pineapple
7) Pour into the glass, add a straw and the garnish
8) Drink the tasty beverage
9) Relax, and notice the URLs in the headers of *every post* to the
   mailing list:

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-devel

10) Decide to visit that page
11) Notice the text at the bottom of that page:

  To change your subscription (... or unsubscribe from mpls-linux-general),
  enter your subscription email address:

12) Enter "fre...@sn..." in the little box and press "Edit Options"
13) Drink more of the tasty beverage
14) Enter in your password and hit "unsubscribe", and then finish the
    tasty beverage.

If you don't remember or know your password, add the following steps

15) Press "Email My Password To Me"
16) Drink more of the tasty beverage
17) Read your e-mail and retrieve your password
18) Go to step 14.

And you're all done!

--=20
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

RE: [mpls-linux-general] problem with ldpd in quagga

[Bertrand L. <ble...@in...>]

So, If i downloaded the quagga 0.97 in your site and I patched it with =
the
quagga patch located in mpls-linux, I have a good version of ldp ?

Thanks a lot...

Tomorrow, play with cisco and linux-mpls !

Bertrand Lemaitre
ble...@in... - http://www.infochti.net
Ing=E9nieur 3=E8me ann=E9e - ESIAL www.esial.uhp-nancy.fr

-----Message d'origine-----
De : James R. Leu [mailto:jl...@mi...]
Envoy=E9 : lundi 18 avril 2005 20:32
=C0 : Bertrand Lemaitre
Cc : mpl...@li...
Objet : Re: [mpls-linux-general] problem with ldpd in quagga

A compiled version of quagga-mpls uses the ldp-portable source to
implement ldpd.  If you are usign pre-compiled binaried, then you
do not need to download ldp-portable.  If you are going to help with
fixing ldpd, then you will need the quagga-mpls and ldp-portable source
files.

On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 08:25:13PM +0200, Bertrand Lemaitre wrote:
> Thanks for the answers.
> So, I don't need to install ldp-portable because quagga / mpls seems =
to
> implement ldp soon... ?
>
> Bertrand Lemaitre
> ble...@in... - http://www.infochti.net
> Ing?nieur 3?me ann?e - ESIAL www.esial.uhp-nancy.fr
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : James R. Leu [mailto:jl...@mi...]
> Envoy? : lundi 18 avril 2005 20:13
> ? : Bertrand Lemaitre
> Cc : mpl...@li...
> Objet : Re: [mpls-linux-general] problem with ldpd in quagga
>
> Yes.  The syntax of the global LDP command has changes from 'mpls ip'
> (which is what is in your sample) to 'mpls ldp'.  I would suggest =
starting
> with a nearly empty ldpd.conf and configuring it via the ldpd CLI.
>
> There is a know issue with starting ldpd with a full config.  The work
> around is to configure ldpd from scratch each time.
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 07:37:12PM +0200, Bertrand Lemaitre wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > When I try to launch ldp installed with quagga, I have this error :
> >
> >
> >
> > Mpls ip : command not recognized?
> >
> >
> >
> > Any idea ?
> >
> >
> >
> > Bertrand Lemaitre
> >
> > ble...@in... - http://www.infochti.net
> >
> > Ing?nieur 3?me ann?e - ESIAL www.esial.uhp-nancy.fr
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >   _____
> >
> > avast! Antivirus <http://www.avast.com> : message Sortant propre.
> >
> >
> > Base de donnee virale (VPS): 0516-0, 18/04/2005
> > Test du: 18/04/2005 19:37:12
> > avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software.
> >
> >
>
> --
> James R. Leu
> jl...@mi...
>
>
>
>
>   _____=20
>
> avast! Antivirus <http://www.avast.com> : message Sortant propre.
>
>
> Base de donnee virale (VPS): 0516-0, 18/04/2005
> Test du: 18/04/2005 20:25:13
> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software.
>
>
>

--
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...




  _____ =20

avast! Antivirus <http://www.avast.com> : message Sortant propre.=20


Base de donnee virale (VPS): 0516-0, 18/04/2005
Test du: 18/04/2005 20:48:31
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2005 ALWIL Software.