mpls-linux-general Mailing List for MPLS for Linux (Page 163)
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
Menu
▾
▴
mpls-linux-general — Mailing list for general discussion about MPLS for Linux
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(26) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(45) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(101) |
Jul
(79) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(71) |
Dec
(53) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(111) |
Feb
(123) |
Mar
(67) |
Apr
(61) |
May
(75) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(79) |
Oct
(85) |
Nov
(58) |
Dec
(39) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(80) |
Apr
(56) |
May
(39) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(68) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(46) |
Oct
(89) |
Nov
(55) |
Dec
(33) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(74) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(105) |
Apr
(96) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(48) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(81) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(147) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(40) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(69) |
May
(41) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(76) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(24) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(67) |
Mar
(91) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(68) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(62) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(63) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
|
From: <ric...@ya...> - 2001-09-04 23:08:33
|
Hi All:
This is Rich, recently i joined the mailing list
so just testing my post works or not.
Rich
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com
|
|
From: nomit k. <nom...@in...> - 2001-09-03 07:03:23
|
Hello, When ever i start LDP between two machines on the same network. When a session establishes between the two machines you find a entry in both the mpls_in files having the same label and instruction ( POP DLV) having the same key eg. 40004000 gen 16 0 POP DLV whats is the significance of these entries. Nomit |
|
From: henry m. <lin...@ya...> - 2001-08-31 21:40:12
|
I was tring to monitor the ldp traffic on my local net by useing tcpdump. Problem I have is I can see all the broadcast traffic and unicast traffic on monitor station but can't see the unicast traffic between other stations on my local net. In other words, on monitor station, I can only see the traffic to monitor station but not other traffic between other station. Anyone who familiar with tcpdump please help me. Thanks HH __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com |
|
From: arvindh_raghavendran <arv...@in...> - 2001-08-30 08:24:20
|
hi, We have installed the mpls-linux patch on which we are installing the ldp-portable-.060 core libraries. We are having some problems. The port directory make file already has the -DMPLS-LINUX option in it. So when we give make from the root ldp-portable directory it gives segmentation fault at=20 $(CC) -o $@ port/ldp_linux.o lib/libldp.a port/libldpport.a lib/libldp.a We are working with Linux-7.0 and on an acer 4100 machine. What we did was : Installed the patch and recompiled the kernel and started with the new kernel. put ldp-portable-.060.tar.gz in /usr/src Unzipped it there to form anothe dir ldp-portable cd ldp-portable and then we compiled=20 make=20 Any help in this regard would be useful. Thanks in Advance, Arvindh.R |
|
From: JK S. <ks...@ve...> - 2001-08-20 07:19:56
|
Hi nitin, I have been working on MPLS related stuff for nearly 6 months. The following would be challenging topics. 1. Since MPLS on Linux is almost ready from sourceforge.net U can try porting MPLS stack on some RTOS. I am porting on eCoS RTOS which is freely available and my target hardware is motorola's PowerPC. 2. U can enhance the capablilities of MPLS on Linux specifically LDP ( Label Distribution Protocol ) -- When I tried this stack from Sourceforge.net LDP was not ready for more than 2 machines. If U need any clarification mail me ...... also let me know Ur back ground. All the best --jkswamy *********************************************************************** Krishna Swamy J Senior Telecom Consultant Velankani Information Systems 43,Electronic City, Phase-II, Hosur Road, Bangalore-561 229, India Tel: 080-852 2507/509 FAX: 080-852 2508 ks...@Ve... jk...@ho... *********************************************************************** ## Reamedy for happiness: Keep COOL, Keep SMILING, Keep in TOUCH *********************************************************************** > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 10:28:12 -0700 (PDT) > From: nitin panjwani <tac...@ya...> > To: mpl...@li... > Subject: [mpls-linux-general] Research Topic > > Hi > I am looking for some resaech topic for my MS project > . > Can anyone suggest me some challenging topic which can > be done with limited resources and in the university > environment . > I saw in March there were couple of other guys who > were also looking for some topic. > I also have same problems that they had . > Thanks, > nitin > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger > http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ > > > > --__--__-- > > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > > End of mpls-linux-general Digest > > -------------------------------------------------------------- Velankani Information Systems Ltd, Bangalore, India |
|
From: nitin p. <tac...@ya...> - 2001-08-18 17:28:13
|
Hi I am looking for some resaech topic for my MS project . Can anyone suggest me some challenging topic which can be done with limited resources and in the university environment . I saw in March there were couple of other guys who were also looking for some topic. I also have same problems that they had . Thanks, nitin __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ |
|
From: Bhaskar K. <bha...@ya...> - 2001-08-15 06:07:57
|
Please Unsubscribe my account --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $0.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger. |
|
From: Yon U. <hav...@gm...> - 2001-08-13 02:03:22
|
Hello, please, test the attached patch. Warning, it patches some lib/ files. Use at your own risk.n TIA yon |
|
From: Yon U. <hav...@gm...> - 2001-08-10 01:38:59
|
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Dave Hartzell wrote: > I'm messing around with a couple Ciscos (running > 12.2 mainline), a Juniper (running 4.4) and a Linux box. > > While I haven't got the Linux box patched yet, I do have > the Ciscos talking TDP, but I can't get the Juniper to > talk to the Ciscos via LDP. > > After looking hard, Cisco still isn't supporting the > RFC based LDP, they are using their Tag Dist Protocol. > Nice. grep www.cisco.com ldp_221t.pdf default distribution protocol is tdp. It can be changed per interface and platform. Citing: "The global 'mpls label protocol ldp' command sets the default label distribution protocol for all interfaces to be LDP.", this command is also valid in interface config mode. and global or interface config mode command "mpls ip". HTH, HAND yon |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2001-08-09 19:25:47
|
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 01:16:01PM -0400, Dave Hartzell wrote: > I'm messing around with a couple Ciscos (running > 12.2 mainline), a Juniper (running 4.4) and a Linux box. > > While I haven't got the Linux box patched yet, I do have > the Ciscos talking TDP, but I can't get the Juniper to > talk to the Ciscos via LDP. > > After looking hard, Cisco still isn't supporting the > RFC based LDP, they are using their Tag Dist Protocol. > Nice. I think the have only released LDP in the ST tree. If you have a cisco support contract you should be able to find the ST code. > Maybe this is an old subject, but will Linux LDP work > with Ciscos? Will it work with Juniper? I guess I can > find out the hard way... The last time I tried to run ldp_linux against a Cisco it worked fine. The code has gone through some big changes since then, your mileage may vary ;-) Jim > Cisco Junip Linux > Cisco Y N ? > Junip N Y M > Linux ? M Y > > Y = yes, confirmed > N = no, confirmed > M = maybe, based on the fact they both use RFC 3036 > ? = don't know...anyone? > > > > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu |
|
From: Dave H. <har...@gr...> - 2001-08-09 19:16:39
|
I'm messing around with a couple Ciscos (running
12.2 mainline), a Juniper (running 4.4) and a Linux box.
While I haven't got the Linux box patched yet, I do have
the Ciscos talking TDP, but I can't get the Juniper to
talk to the Ciscos via LDP.
After looking hard, Cisco still isn't supporting the
RFC based LDP, they are using their Tag Dist Protocol.
Nice.
Maybe this is an old subject, but will Linux LDP work
with Ciscos? Will it work with Juniper? I guess I can
find out the hard way...
Thanks!
Dave
Cisco Junip Linux
Cisco Y N ?
Junip N Y M
Linux ? M Y
Y = yes, confirmed
N = no, confirmed
M = maybe, based on the fact they both use RFC 3036
? = don't know...anyone?
|
|
From: Daniel M. H. <ma...@la...> - 2001-08-09 12:41:01
|
When I try compile mplsadm in Linux Conectiva 6.0 this error ocurr: ursr/bin/ld: cannot find -lc Anyone can help me? Please. Thanks for advance. Daniel Makoto Hiramatsu |
|
From: Dhiman B. <dh...@cs...> - 2001-08-07 21:50:05
|
Hi, Even I had to fix it that way. But I don't know how to make label switching works. Every time I used commands for port switching, I got "No buffer available." -dhiman Dave Hartzell claims the following: > This works for 2.4.7 also... > > "James R. Leu" wrote: > > > On 2.4.6 the ARPHRD_MPLS_TUNNEL conflicts with an existing value. > > > > Search for *.rej in your kernel source and manually add ARPHRD_MPLS_TUNNEL > > with a differnt value. > > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 03:01:03PM +0300, Panos Kolyvas wrote: > > > > > > Hi to all, > > > > > > I wonder if you could help me with the following problem. I have already > > > downloaded the mpls-linux-0.993.tar.gz image. I applied the patch to my > > > kernel (2.4.6). I activated all the necessary fields > > > through make xconfig and tried to compile the new kernel. > > > > > > I got the following results. > > > > > > mpls_tunnel.c: In function `mpls_tunnel_init_gen': > > > mpls_tunnel.c:252: `ARPHRD_MPLS_TUNNEL' undeclared (first use in this > > > function) > > > mpls_tunnel.c:252: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > > > mpls_tunnel.c:252: for each function it appears in.) > > > make[3]: *** [mpls_tunnel.o] Error 1 > > > make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.6/net/mpls' > > > make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2 > > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.6/net/mpls' > > > make[1]: *** [_subdir_mpls] Error 2 > > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.6/net' > > > make: *** [_dir_net] Error 2 > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- Aleph-null bottles of beer on the wall, Aleph-null bottles of beer, You take one down, and pass it around, Aleph-null bottles of beer on the wall. |
|
From: Dave H. <har...@gr...> - 2001-08-07 18:47:42
|
This works for 2.4.7 also... "James R. Leu" wrote: > On 2.4.6 the ARPHRD_MPLS_TUNNEL conflicts with an existing value. > > Search for *.rej in your kernel source and manually add ARPHRD_MPLS_TUNNEL > with a differnt value. > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 03:01:03PM +0300, Panos Kolyvas wrote: > > > > Hi to all, > > > > I wonder if you could help me with the following problem. I have already > > downloaded the mpls-linux-0.993.tar.gz image. I applied the patch to my > > kernel (2.4.6). I activated all the necessary fields > > through make xconfig and tried to compile the new kernel. > > > > I got the following results. > > > > mpls_tunnel.c: In function `mpls_tunnel_init_gen': > > mpls_tunnel.c:252: `ARPHRD_MPLS_TUNNEL' undeclared (first use in this > > function) > > mpls_tunnel.c:252: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > > mpls_tunnel.c:252: for each function it appears in.) > > make[3]: *** [mpls_tunnel.o] Error 1 > > make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.6/net/mpls' > > make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2 > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.6/net/mpls' > > make[1]: *** [_subdir_mpls] Error 2 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.6/net' > > make: *** [_dir_net] Error 2 > > > > |
|
From: Yon U. <hav...@gm...> - 2001-08-06 22:14:41
|
Hi, On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, James R. Leu wrote: > Hello, > > Please don't take this the wrong way, but do you know how to use 'grep'? ;-) > cd /usr/src/linux/net/mpls > grep -l mii_tree *.[ch] > mpls_in_info.c > mpls_init.c > mpls_input.c > mpls_proc.c > > After looking in each the files you'll find it's defined in mpls_init.c > mpls_init(). > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 06:14:50PM +0530, Pradeep wrote: > > In the file mpls_init.c - there are two extern variables used namely > > mii_tree(Of type struct mpls_in_info_tree) and moi_tree (Of Type struct > > mpls_out_info_tree ). > > > > Can anyone please tell me where are these 2 > > variables mii_tree and moi_tree declared?? > > > > Also, I am not able to find the definition of the > > structures struct mpls_in_info_tree and struct mpls_out_info_tree. Can > > anyone please tell me in which file is the definition of these 2 > > structures present??? http://lxr.linux.no/ is of incredible help. I have linux, zebra and the mpls code under it. Install htdig, it's even better than grep ! HTH, HAND yon |
|
From: Yon U. <hav...@gm...> - 2001-08-06 22:12:11
|
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, James R. Leu wrote: > Hello, > > As you've noticed I'm back from my looooonnnng mailing-list silence. > Work combined with being out in CA getting ready for the Networld + InterOp > MPLS interoperability lab, I was a bit over loaded. > > I have gotten e-mail about lots of cool things being added by people. > Patches, docs, etc will be added to the CVS tree as I get a chance to look > through them. > > One thing to note is that everything that is being contributed is assumed to > be covered by the GPL or LGPL, all other licensing MUST be specifically > spelled out. mplsflush is GPL, feel free to add the boilerplate. thx. y"sex...@wa..."on |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2001-08-06 21:03:47
|
Hello, As you've noticed I'm back from my looooonnnng mailing-list silence. Work combined with being out in CA getting ready for the Networld + InterOp MPLS interoperability lab, I was a bit over loaded. I have gotten e-mail about lots of cool things being added by people. Patches, docs, etc will be added to the CVS tree as I get a chance to look through them. One thing to note is that everything that is being contributed is assumed to be covered by the GPL or LGPL, all other licensing MUST be specifically spelled out. Jim -- James R. Leu |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2001-08-06 20:44:18
|
Hello, Please don't take this the wrong way, but do you know how to use 'grep'? cd /usr/src/linux/net/mpls grep -l mii_tree *.[ch] mpls_in_info.c mpls_init.c mpls_input.c mpls_proc.c After looking in each the files you'll find it's defined in mpls_init.c mpls_init(). On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 06:14:50PM +0530, Pradeep wrote: > In the file mpls_init.c - there are two extern variables used namely > mii_tree(Of type struct mpls_in_info_tree) and moi_tree (Of Type struct > mpls_out_info_tree ). > > Can anyone please tell me where are these 2 > variables mii_tree and moi_tree declared?? > > Also, I am not able to find the definition of the > structures struct mpls_in_info_tree and struct mpls_out_info_tree. Can > anyone please tell me in which file is the definition of these 2 > structures present??? To find structure definitions you'd need to look in header files. So what I would do is: cd /usr/src/linux find . -name '*.h' -print | xargs grep -l 'struct mpls_in_info_tree' ./include/net/mpls.h Again, I'm not trying to be mean, but you atleast have to try a little before mailing the list. Jim -- James R. Leu |
|
From: Dattatray K. <dat...@in...> - 2001-08-06 11:34:51
|
Hi, What is the relation between label stack & a tunnel? where can i get the detailed information regarding this? regards, dattatray |
|
From: Dhiman B. <dh...@cs...> - 2001-08-06 05:40:19
|
Hi, Does mpls enabled Linux talk with CISCO router for label distribution ? Or are labelled pkts in Linux identified by a CISCO router or vise versa ? Thanks, Dhiman -- |
|
From: Yon U. <sex...@wa...> - 2001-08-02 01:38:56
|
Hi, someone might find this usefull, specially when you ^C ldp_* and want to restart the daemons and not get confused about what is new and old. BTW: labelspace on lo is usually set (to 0). Is this needed for something? Will deleting it break something? regards yon |
|
From: Yon U. <sex...@wa...> - 2001-08-01 14:46:42
|
Hello,
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Vincent Jardin wrote:
> >
> > Very nice indeed. I'm on page 74, though I didn't know you had had no
> > response from me.
> > As a knee jerk reflex, allow me to post a diff from my working copy to
> > the cvs repository. This is *raw*, apply the patch, add the files
> > ldp_netlink.[ch] to zebra-port/, try to compile.
>
> Thanks, I'll try it this afternoon. I do not know when I could answer, I
> should have no internet access during the next 3 weeks. What's your plan
> about the zebra-port ?
Get it working stable, but feature poor. Then add features. I think about
implementing LSR in zebrad, but that sounds a bit hmm, difficult as you
put it. I wanna get ldp running in its own process first.
easy: ldp running
not so easy: crldp
somewhat difficult: vanilla mpls in zebra (ldp for nh resolution)
+ vanilla bgp/mpls
difficult: bgp/mpls-vpn, [ospf,isis]-te + [tunnel interfaces]
> > I wanted to make a better patch soon. I shall.
> >
> > > Somedays, I will try to publish on the web all my testbeds and the
> > > scripts that are described in this documentation. (My CVS repository is
> > > only opened in our ENST's Intranet).
> > >
> > > I hope it could be usefull.
> > >
> > > Vincent
> >
> > looks very nice, though there is no zebra 3.5 version ;-)
>
> Oops, on which page did I do this mistake ?
Logical 40, phusical 49, Chapter 7.1.2
regards
yon
|
|
From: Pradeep <pra...@sa...> - 2001-08-01 12:50:13
|
In the file mpls_init.c - there are two extern variables used namely
mii_tree(Of type struct mpls_in_info_tree) and moi_tree (Of Type struct
mpls_out_info_tree ).
Can anyone please tell me where are these 2
variables mii_tree and moi_tree declared??
Also, I am not able to find the definition of the
structures struct mpls_in_info_tree and struct mpls_out_info_tree. Can
anyone please tell me in which file is the definition of these 2
structures present???
TIA
Pradeep Pangi
|
|
From: <pim...@in...> - 2001-08-01 08:36:16
|
di...@mo... wrote: > Hi, > Can you tell why the tc_test.c and tc_addlabel.c haven't been > compiled by including them in TCOBJS (alongwith rsvp_LLkernel.c)? tc_test.c and tc_addlabel.c are BSD-only files, (look at libmpls.c, mplsadm.c for the linux code) Pim. > > Thanks in advance, > Dipak > > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- Pim Van Heuven Ghent University - IMEC Department of Information Technology (INTEC) Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat, 41 B-9000, Gent, Belgium tel.: +32-(0)9267 3592, secr.: +32-(0)9267 3570 fax : +32-(0)9267 3599 e-mail : pim...@in... WWW : http://www.intec.rug.ac.be |
|
From: Vincent J. <ja...@en...> - 2001-08-01 07:34:18
|
> > Very nice indeed. I'm on page 74, though I didn't know you had had no > response from me. > As a knee jerk reflex, allow me to post a diff from my working copy to > the cvs repository. This is *raw*, apply the patch, add the files > ldp_netlink.[ch] to zebra-port/, try to compile. Thanks, I'll try it this afternoon. I do not know when I could answer, I should have no internet access during the next 3 weeks. What's your plan about the zebra-port ? > I wanted to make a better patch soon. I shall. > > > Somedays, I will try to publish on the web all my testbeds and the > > scripts that are described in this documentation. (My CVS repository is > > only opened in our ENST's Intranet). > > > > I hope it could be usefull. > > > > Vincent > > looks very nice, though there is no zebra 3.5 version ;-) Oops, on which page did I do this mistake ? Thanks for your comments ;-) Vincent |
533 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
