From: John B <yoc...@lo...> - 2005-10-04 16:05:56
|
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 02:27, Michael Kuss wrote: > Hi John, did you google? That's around for quite a while now. Nope, I sure didn't, and can't figure out what I'd even have used to look for something like this, oh well. This is something in a build I'd never seen before, that's why it really threw me off. > Briefly, > by default rpm terminates if files are build (or declared docs) but not > packaged. The long story is here: > http://www.rpm.org/hintskinks/unpackaged-files/. > > You can overwrite this behavior in your .rpmmacros, here's an excerpt of > mine: > > # Should unpackaged files in a build root terminate a build? > %_unpackaged_files_terminate_build 1 > > # Should missing %doc files in the build directory terminate a build? > %_missing_doc_files_terminate_build 0 > > Hence, rpmbuild issues an error if built files are not being packaged, but > only a warning for doc files. Found it, and fixed...I hope, heh heh. I'll upload it to the wiki as soon as I figure out how. Thanks for the help Michael! Take care, JB |