From: Griffin C. <gri...@ho...> - 2002-10-14 23:39:27
|
I like the idea of the seperate projects, with www.mockobjects.com being the hub for all information. That way, any new projects (ports, implementation, etc..) won't need to be managed by the www.mockobjects.com guys. It would be tough to control a single project that has 47 project admins, one for each "port". Similar to how the xUnit ports were handled. I definatly think that there should be a central, generic area of information about the direction of the mock objects community in general. -Griffin >From: "Steve Freeman" <st...@m3...> >To: "MockObjects" <moc...@li...> >Subject: Re: [MO-java-dev] .NET Mock Objects? >Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 21:24:20 +0100 > >I'm in 2 minds about this. On the one hand, it would be nice to have >everything in the same place. On the other hand, on sourceforge, the >project seems to be the unit of control, who gets to be a commiter >etc -- so that seems like the right granularity. If anything, there >might be an argument for having mockobjects as a glue project, for >documentation say, and adding a new mockobjects-java. > >Any opinions, anyone? > >S. > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Jeff Martin" <je...@mk...> > > Personally I'd rather see dotnetmock move over here. > > > > Not to try and subsume what you're doing but to try and keep the flow >of > > ideas between different implementations going. > > > > It would be nice to present a united front rather than a whole series >of > > small loosely related projects. > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >Welcome to geek heaven. >http://thinkgeek.com/sf >_______________________________________________ >Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list >Moc...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev Griffin Caprio cell: (773) 230-0936 _________________________________________________________________ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com |