RE: [MO-java-dev] Common test cases

[Trenton L. <Tre...@cn...>]

Yes, and just to be clear, these should be partial (or even full) implementations of the interfaces. These won't be mocks, since we'll actually need the classes to fill their role and relay configuration data to the servlet.

*trenton

-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent Massol [mailto:vm...@oc...]
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 12:33 PM
To: Moc...@li...
Subject: RE: [MO-java-dev] Common test cases


+1

We need to make sure they are still quite generic though.

-Vincent

> -----Original Message-----
> From: moc...@li...
> [mailto:moc...@li...] On Behalf Of
> Jeff Martin
> Sent: 19 June 2002 16:48
> To: MockObjects
> Subject: [MO-java-dev] Common test cases
> 
> I've been starting to thing that it might be nice to have some
abstract
> test cases which perform common and boring setup of mock objects.
> 
> Like setting up servlet requests and all those context type stuff.
> 
> Thoughts/objects?
> --
> Jeff Martin
> 
> Memetic Engineer
> 
> http://www.custommonkey.org/
> 
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> --
>                    Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy
>                    >>>     http://thinkgeek.com/sf    <<<
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list
> Moc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy
                   >>>     http://thinkgeek.com/sf    <<<

_______________________________________________
Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list
Moc...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev